Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2504730.2504765acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesimcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

From Paris to Tokyo: on the suitability of ping to measure latency

Published: 23 October 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Monitoring Internet performance and measuring user quality of experience are drawing increased attention from both research and industry. To match this interest, large-scale measurement infrastructures have been constructed. We believe that this effort must be combined with a critical review and calibrarion of the tools being used to measure performance.
In this paper, we analyze the suitability of ping for delay measurement. By performing several experiments on different source and destination pairs, we found cases in which ping gave very poor estimates of delay and jitter as they might be experienced by an application. In those cases, delay was heavily dependent on the flow identifier, even if only one IP path was used. For accurate delay measurement we propose to replace the ping tool with an adaptation of paris-traceroute which supports delay and jitter estimation, without being biased by per-flow network load balancing.

Supplementary Material

PDF File (crimc125s.pdf)
Consolidated Review of From Paris to Tokyo: On the Suitability of Ping to Measure Latency

References

[1]
B. Augustin, T. Friedman, and R. Teixeira. Measuring load-balanced paths in the internet. In ACM Internet Measurement Conference (IMC 2007), 2007.
[2]
F. Baker, 1995. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), RFC 1812.
[3]
Matt Calder, Zi Hu Xun Fan, Ethan Katz-Bassett, John Heidemann, and Ramesh Govindan. Mapping the Expansion of Google's Serving Infrastructure (To Appear). In Proceedings of the ACM Internet Measurement Conference (IMC '13), October 2013.
[4]
Z. Cao, Z. Wang, and E. Zegura. Performance of hashing-based schemes for Internet load balancing. In INFOCOM, pages 332--341, 2000.
[5]
Luca Cittadini. Tokyo-ping. http://psg.com/tokyo-ping-v2.tar.gz.
[6]
Gregory Detal, Christoph Paasch, Simon van der Linden, Pascal Mérindol, Gildas Avoine, and Olivier Bonaventure. Revisiting flow-based load balancing: Stateless path selection in data center networks. Computer Networks, 57(5):1204--1216, April 2013.
[7]
C. Dovrolis, K. Gummadi, A. Kuzmanovic, and S. D. Meinrath. Measurement Lab: Overview and an Invitation to the Research Community. SIGCOMM CCR 2010, 2010.
[8]
T. Flach, E. Katz-Bassett, and R. Govindan. Quantifying violations of destination-based forwarding on the Internet. In ACM Internet Measurement Conference (IMC 2012), 2012.
[9]
A. Greenberg, J. R. Hamilton, N. Jain, S. Kandula, C. Kim, P. Lahiri, D. A. Maltz, P. Patel, and S. Sengupta. VL2: a scalable and flexible data center network. In ACM SIGCOMM, 2009.
[10]
K. Kompella, J. Drake, S. Amante, W. Henderickx, and L. Yong. The Use of Entropy Labels in MPLS Forwarding, November 2012. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), RFC 6790.
[11]
R. Krishnan, S. Khanna, L. Yong, A. Ghanwani, Ning So, and B. Khasnabish. Mechanisms for optimal {LAG/ECMP} component link utilization in networks, April 2013. draft-krishnan-opsawg-large-flow-load-balancing-08.txt, work in progress.
[12]
J. Mudigonda, P. Yalagandula, M. Al-Fares, and J. C. Mogul. Spain: Cots data-center ethernet for multipathing over arbitrary topologies. In NSDI, 2010.
[13]
RIPE NCC. RIPE Atlas. https://atlas.ripe.net.
[14]
RIPE NCC. RIPE Test Traffic Measurement Service. https://atlas.ripe.net.
[15]
J. Postel. User Datagram Protocol, 1980. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), RFC 768.
[16]
J. Postel. Internet Control Message Protocol, 1981. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), RFC 792.
[17]
SamKnows. Samknows. http://www.samknows.com.
[18]
R. Stewart. Stream Control Transmission Protocol, 2007. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), RFC 4960.
[19]
Georgia Tech et al. Project BISmark. http://projectbismark.net.
[20]
Jeff Wheeler and Job Snijders. Understanding MPLS hashing. NANOG 57, February 2013.
[21]
K. Xi, Y. Liu, and J. Chao. Enabling flow-based routing control in data center networks using probe and ECMP. In INFOCOM Workshop on cloud computing (2011), page 614--619, 2001.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Enhancing real-time mobile health video streams: A cross-layer Region-of-Interest based approachComputer Networks10.1016/j.comnet.2024.111014257(111014)Online publication date: Mar-2025
  • (2024)Measuring Network Latency from a Wireless ISP: Variations Within and Across SubnetsProceedings of the 2024 ACM on Internet Measurement Conference10.1145/3646547.3688438(29-43)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Towards a Stateless Reverse Traceroute ProtocolICC 2024 - IEEE International Conference on Communications10.1109/ICC51166.2024.10622935(1090-1095)Online publication date: 9-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. From Paris to Tokyo: on the suitability of ping to measure latency

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Conferences
        IMC '13: Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Internet measurement conference
        October 2013
        480 pages
        ISBN:9781450319539
        DOI:10.1145/2504730
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Sponsors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 23 October 2013

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. delay
        2. jitter
        3. load-balancing
        4. ping

        Qualifiers

        • Short-paper

        Conference

        IMC'13
        IMC'13: Internet Measurement Conference
        October 23 - 25, 2013
        Barcelona, Spain

        Acceptance Rates

        IMC '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 42 of 178 submissions, 24%;
        Overall Acceptance Rate 277 of 1,083 submissions, 26%

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)50
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8
        Reflects downloads up to 27 Jan 2025

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2025)Enhancing real-time mobile health video streams: A cross-layer Region-of-Interest based approachComputer Networks10.1016/j.comnet.2024.111014257(111014)Online publication date: Mar-2025
        • (2024)Measuring Network Latency from a Wireless ISP: Variations Within and Across SubnetsProceedings of the 2024 ACM on Internet Measurement Conference10.1145/3646547.3688438(29-43)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2024
        • (2024)Towards a Stateless Reverse Traceroute ProtocolICC 2024 - IEEE International Conference on Communications10.1109/ICC51166.2024.10622935(1090-1095)Online publication date: 9-Jun-2024
        • (2024)A Standard-compliant Assessment of Beyond-eMBB QoS/QoE in 5G Networks2024 IEEE Conference on Standards for Communications and Networking (CSCN)10.1109/CSCN63874.2024.10849717(230-236)Online publication date: 25-Nov-2024
        • (2024)Analysis and Optimization for Passive One-way Delay Measurement Tax in Container Networks2024 IEEE 17th International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD)10.1109/CLOUD62652.2024.00036(247-255)Online publication date: 7-Jul-2024
        • (2024)Analysis of SR-IOV in Docker containers using RTT measurementsComputer Communications10.1016/j.comcom.2024.107961228:COnline publication date: 1-Dec-2024
        • (2023)Schooling NOOBs with eBPFProceedings of the 1st Workshop on eBPF and Kernel Extensions10.1145/3609021.3609302(21-27)Online publication date: 10-Sep-2023
        • (2023)Latency Measurement Approach for Black Box Components in Edge Computing Environments2023 IEEE International Conference on Smart Information Systems and Technologies (SIST)10.1109/SIST58284.2023.10223523(327-331)Online publication date: 4-May-2023
        • (2023)End-to-End Latency Measurements with Black Box Components2023 IEEE 12th International Conference on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems: Technology and Applications (IDAACS)10.1109/IDAACS58523.2023.10348913(73-78)Online publication date: 7-Sep-2023
        • (2022)Towards client-side active measurements without application controlACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review10.1145/3523230.352323452:1(20-27)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2022
        • Show More Cited By

        View Options

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Figures

        Tables

        Media

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media