Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2505515.2507838acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

The essence of knowledge (bases) through entity rankings

Published: 27 October 2013 Publication History

Abstract

We consider the task of automatically phrasing and computing top-k rankings over the information contained in common knowledge bases (KBs), such as YAGO or DBPedia. We assemble the thematic focus and ranking criteria of rankings by inspecting the present Subject, Predicate, Object (SPO) triples. Making use of numerical attributes contained in the KB we are also able to compute the actual ranking content, i.e., entities and their performances. We further discuss the integration of existing rankings into the ranking generation process for increased coverage and ranking quality. We report on first results obtained using the YAGO knowledge base.

References

[1]
R. Agrawal, T. Imielinski, and A. N. Swami. Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. SIGMOD, 1993.
[2]
F. Alvanaki, E. Ilieva, S. Michel, and A. Stupar. Interesting event detection through hall of fame rankings. DBSocial, 2013.
[3]
S. Auer, C. Bizer, G. Kobilarov, J. Lehmann, R. Cyganiak, and Z. G. Ives. Dbpedia: A nucleus for a web of open data. ISWC/ASWC, 2007.
[4]
C. Bizer, T. Heath, and T. Berners-Lee. Linked data - the story so far. Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst., 5(3), 2009.
[5]
K. Braunschweig, J. Eberius, M. Thiele, and W. Lehner. Open - enabling non-expert users to extract, integrate, and analyze open data. Datenbank-Spektrum, 12(2), 2012.
[6]
S. Chaudhuri and U. Dayal. An overview of data warehousing and olap technology. SIGMOD Record, 26(1), 1997.
[7]
L. A. Galárraga, C. Teflioudi, K. Hose, and F. M. Suchanek. Amie: association rule mining under incomplete evidence in ontological knowledge bases. WWW, 2013.
[8]
M. A. Hasan, V. Chaoji, S. Salem, J. Besson, and M. J. Zaki. Origami: Mining representative orthogonal graph patterns. ICDM, 2007.
[9]
R. Kumar, P. Raghavan, S. Rajagopalan, and A. Tomkins. Extracting Large-Scale Knowledge Bases from the Web. VLDB, 1999.
[10]
M. Miah, G. Das, V. Hristidis, and H. Mannila. Standing out in a crowd: Selecting attributes for maximum visibility. ICDE, 2008.
[11]
F. M. Suchanek, G. Kasneci, and G. Weikum. Yago: a core of semantic knowledge. WWW, 2007.
[12]
M. J. Zaki. Efficiently mining frequent trees in a forest: Algorithms and applications. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 17(8), 2005.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. The essence of knowledge (bases) through entity rankings

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CIKM '13: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management
      October 2013
      2612 pages
      ISBN:9781450322638
      DOI:10.1145/2505515
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 27 October 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. entity rankings
      2. knowledge bases

      Qualifiers

      • Poster

      Conference

      CIKM'13
      Sponsor:
      CIKM'13: 22nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
      October 27 - November 1, 2013
      California, San Francisco, USA

      Acceptance Rates

      CIKM '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 143 of 848 submissions, 17%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 1,861 of 8,427 submissions, 22%

      Upcoming Conference

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 15 Oct 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2022)Concept and Computation of Ranking-based DominanceInformation Systems10.1016/j.is.2019.05.00484:C(174-188)Online publication date: 20-Apr-2022
      • (2018)NERank+Frontiers of Computer Science: Selected Publications from Chinese Universities10.1007/s11704-017-6471-412:3(504-517)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2018
      • (2017)LSH-Based Probabilistic Pruning of Inverted Indices for Sets and Ranked ListsProceedings of the 20th International Workshop on the Web and Databases10.1145/3068839.3068845(23-28)Online publication date: 14-May-2017
      • (2016)Efficient Similarity Search across Top-k Lists under the Kendall's Tau DistanceProceedings of the 28th International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management10.1145/2949689.2949709(1-12)Online publication date: 18-Jul-2016
      • (2016)Mining Entity RankingsDatenbank-Spektrum10.1007/s13222-015-0205-216:1(27-38)Online publication date: 2-Feb-2016
      • (2016)NERank: Bringing Order to Named Entities from TextsWeb Technologies and Applications10.1007/978-3-319-45814-4_2(15-27)Online publication date: 17-Sep-2016

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media