Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Clothing the naked emperor: the unfulfilled promise of the science of usability

Published: 01 November 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Evaluation and usability as a practice area has diversified its approaches, broadened the spectrum of UX issues it addresses, and extended its contribution into deeper levels of product-development decision making. This forum addresses conceptual, methodological, and professional issues that arise in the field's continuing effort to contribute robust information about users to product planning and design. David Siegel and Susan Dray, Editors

References

[1]
Bias, R. G. and Mayhew, D. J., eds. Cost-Justifying Usability: An Update for the Internet Age, Second Edition. Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco, 2005.
[2]
ISO. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminal (VDT's)--Part 11: Guidance on usability (ISO 9241-11(E)). Geneva, Switzerland, 1998, 2.
[3]
Cockton, G. Usability evaluation. In The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd Edition. M. Soegaard and R. F. Dam, eds. The Interaction Design Foundation, Aarhus, Denmark, 2013; http://www.interaction-design.org/encyclopedia/usability_evaluation.html
[4]
Nunes, N. What drives software development: Bridging the gap between software and usability engineering. Human-Centered Software Engineering, Human--Computer Interaction Series I, (2009), 9--25.
[5]
Au, F. T. W., Baker, S., Warren, I., and Dobbie, G. Automated usability testing framework. Proc. Ninth Australasian User Interface Conference vol. 76. B. Plimmer and G. Weber, eds. ACS, 2008, 55--64.
[6]
Nielsen, J. Usability for the masses. Journal of Usability Studies 1, 1 (2005), 2--3.
[7]
Reiss, E. L. Usable Usability: Simple Steps for Making Stuff Better. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2012.
[8]
Tullis, T. and Albert, W. Measuring the User Experience: Collecting, Analyzing, and Presenting Usability Metrics. Morgan Kaufman, Burlington, MA, 2008.
[9]
Carroll, J. Personal communication. June 29, 2013.
[10]
Dillon, A. Personal communication. June 19, 2013.
[11]
Lewis, C. Personal communication. June 19, 2013.
[12]
Molich, R. CUE - Comparative usability evaluation. 2012; http://www.dialogdesign.dk/CUE.html
[13]
Sauro, J. and Lewis, J. R. Quantifying the User Experience: Practical Statistics for User Research. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, MA, 2012.
[14]
Nemeth, C. P. Human Factors Methods for Design: Making Systems Human-Centered. CRC Press, New York, 2004.
[15]
Stanton, N. A., Slamon, P. M., Walker, G. H., Baber, C., and Jenkins, D. P. Human Factors Methods: A Practical Guide for Engineering and Design. Ashgate, Burlington, VT, 2005.
[16]
Siegel, D. A. Commentary on {<zref=R3>3<zrefx>}. In The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd Edition. M. Soegaard and R. F. Dam, eds. The Interaction Design Foundation, Aarhus, Denmark, 2013; http://www.interaction-design.org/encyclopedia/usability_evaluation.html
[17]
Rosenbaum, S. Commentary on {<zref=R3>3<zrefx>}. In The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd Edition. M. Soegaard and R. F. Dam, eds. The Interaction Design Foundation, Aarhus, Denmark, 2013; http://www.interaction-design.org/encyclopedia/usability_evaluation.html

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Maximizing Research Impact: A Panel Discussion On Method Selection for Non-Research StakeholdersProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting10.1177/107118132266103666:1(1913-1914)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2022
  • (2013)Where's the Rigor in the Field of Usability Analysis?IEEE Intelligent Systems10.1109/MIS.2013.15028:6(66-72)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2013

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 November 2013
Published in INTERACTIONS Volume 20, Issue 6

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Popular
  • Pre-selected

Funding Sources

  • University of Texas at Austin IC2 Institute

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)122
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)25
Reflects downloads up to 17 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Maximizing Research Impact: A Panel Discussion On Method Selection for Non-Research StakeholdersProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting10.1177/107118132266103666:1(1913-1914)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2022
  • (2013)Where's the Rigor in the Field of Usability Analysis?IEEE Intelligent Systems10.1109/MIS.2013.15028:6(66-72)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2013

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Digital Edition

View this article in digital edition.

Digital Edition

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media