Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2539150.2539259acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiiwasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Improved Relaxation-based Ontology Matching Negotiation

Published: 02 December 2013 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Agent-based Ontology Alignment Negotiation processes aims to generate an alignment through the interaction of two or more agents. When these agents exploit different matching services they can reach incompatible alignments, giving rise to conflicts hence the need to engage in a negotiation to achieve consensus. This consensus is sounder as more conflicts are correctly solved. In this paper, a Relaxation-based approach for Agent-based Ontology Matching Negotiation is explored and compared with the MbA/FDO argument-based approach. The limitations of the original Relaxation approach are addressed and modifications are proposed that increase the circumstances under which conflict resolution may occur, thus generating sounder alignments.

    References

    [1]
    J. Euzenat and P. Shvaiko, "Ontology Matching," Springer-Verlang, Heidelberg, Germany, 2007.
    [2]
    T. Bench-Capon, "Persuasion in Pratical Argument Using Value-Based Argumentation Frameworks," Journal of Logic and Computation, vol. 13, pp. 429--448, 2003.
    [3]
    C. Trojahn, M. Moraes, P. Quaresma and R. Vieria, "A Negotiation Model for Ontology Mapping," in Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology (IAT'06), 2006.
    [4]
    P. Maio, N. Bettencourt, N. Silva and J. Rocha, "Ontology Mapping Negotiation Based on Categorization of Semantic Bridges," in ICKEDS'06, Lisbon, Portugal, 2006.
    [5]
    N. Silva, P. Maio and J. Rocha, "An Approach to Ontology Mapping Negotiation," in Workshop on Integrating Ontologies on the Third International Conference on Knowledge Capture, Banff, Canada, 2005.
    [6]
    "Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative," {Online}. Available: http://oaei.ontologymatching.org/.
    [7]
    E. Rahm and P. Bernstein, "A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching," The VLDB Journal, no. 10, pp. 334--350, 2001.
    [8]
    P. Shvaiko and J. Euzenat, "A survey on schema-based matching approaches," Journal on Data Semanatics, vol. IV, pp. 146--171, 2005.
    [9]
    D. Gale and L. Shapley, "College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage," American Mathematical Monthly, no. 69, pp. 5--15, 1962.
    [10]
    J. Munkres, "Algorithms for the Assignment and Transportation Problems," Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathmatics, no. 5, pp. 32--38, 1957.
    [11]
    D. Ngo, Z. Bellahsene, R. Colleta and others, "A flexible system for ontology matching," 2011.
    [12]
    K. Saruladha, G. Aghila and B. Sathiya, "A Comparative Analysis of Ontology and Schema Matching Systems," International Journal of Computer Applications, no. 34, pp. 14--21, 2011.
    [13]
    P. Maio and N. Silva, "GOALS - A test-bed for Ontology Matching," in Knowledge Engineering and Ontology Development (KEOD), Funchal, Portugal, 2009.
    [14]
    L. Laera, V. Tamma, J. Euzenat and T. Payne, "Reaching Agreement over Ontology Alignments," in 5th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), Athens, GA, US, 2006.
    [15]
    L. Laera, I. Blacoe, V. Tamma, T. Payne, J. Euzenat and T. Bench-Capon, "Argumentation over Ontology Correspondences in MAS," in AAMAS'07, Honululu, Hawaii, USA, 2007.
    [16]
    P. Doran, T. Payne, V. Tamma and I. Palmisiano, "Deciding Agent Orientation on Ontology Mappings," in 9th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), 2010.
    [17]
    P. Maio and N. Silva, "A Three-Layer Argumentation Framework," in Theorie and Applications of Formal Argumentation, Springer Berlin, 2012, pp. 163--180.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    IIWAS '13: Proceedings of International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services
    December 2013
    753 pages
    ISBN:9781450321136
    DOI:10.1145/2539150
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    In-Cooperation

    • @WAS: International Organization of Information Integration and Web-based Applications and Services

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 02 December 2013

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Agents
    2. Argumentation
    3. Multi-Agent Systems
    4. Negotiation
    5. Ontology Matching
    6. Relaxation

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    IIWAS '13

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 31
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media