Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2557977.2558027acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicuimcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Expectation-based sentence comprehension in Korean: evidence from behavioral and neurological studies

Published: 09 January 2014 Publication History

Abstract

The goal of this study was to provide meaningful insights in the algorithms of statistical and computational modeling in natural language processing, by emphasizing the role of expectation in human language comprehension. To obtain the evidence for expectation-based sentence comprehension in Korean, we revisited Lee's study [1, 2] in which the processing of Korean relative-clause sentences was tested. In Study 1, using Lee's materials, we conducted gated cloze tasks by which the conditional probability of a target constituent was computed at each point in a way that a word was incrementally added to a sentence fragment. Then, the patterns of the computed conditional probabilities of target constituents were compared to those of the reading times of target constituents that Lee had observed. In Study 2, we examined whether the patterns of the expectation-based sentence processing that we observed in Study 1 was modulated by readers' working memory capacity. Finally, in Study 3, an fMRI study was conducted to explore the locus of expectation-based sentence processing in brain. We found that the patterns of conditional probabilities were mapped to those of behavioral reading times, but we did not observe individual differences in expectation-based comprehension. We also obtained neurological results suggesting that the Broca area is the locus for the processing of the expected syntactic information. Taken together, our behavioral and neurological findings provided evidence supporting expectation-based sentence comprehension in Korean.

References

[1]
Lee, B. T. 1995. Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity and Language Comprehension. MA thesis. Seoul National University.
[2]
Lee, B. T., Kim, K. J., and Zoh, M. H., 1996. Working memory and language: individual differences in reading span and language processing, Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 8(1): 59--85.
[3]
Hale, J. 2001. A probabilistic Earley parser as a psycholinguistic model. In Proceedings of the Second Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 18). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
[4]
Levy, R. 2008. Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition 106 (3): 1126--1177.
[5]
Levy, R. and Keller, F. 2013. Expectation and Locality Effects in German Verb-final Structures. Journal of Memory and Language 68(2): 199--222.
[6]
Taylor, W. L. 1953. "Cloze procedure": A new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Quarterly, 30: 415--433.
[7]
Baayen, R. H. 2008. Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge University Press.
[8]
Gelman, A., and Hill, J. 2007. Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[9]
Daneman, M., and Carpenter, P. A. 1980. Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19 (4): 450--466.
[10]
Ashby, J., Rayner, K, and Clifton, C., Jr. 2005. Eye movements of highly skilled and average readers: Differential effects of frequency and predictability. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 58A(6): 1065--1086.
[11]
Broca, M. P. 1861. Remarques sur le siége de la faculté du langage articulé, suivies d'une observation d'aphemie (Perte de la Parole) Bulletins et Memoires de la Societe Anatomique de Paris. 36: 330--357.
[12]
Burock, M. A., Buckner, R. L, Woldorff, M. G., Rosen, B. R., and Dale, A. M. 1998. Randomized event-related experimental designs allow for extremely rapid presentation rates using function MRI. Neuroreport 9:3735--3739.
[13]
Rorden, C. and Brett, M. 2000. Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. Behavioural Neurology 12: 91--200
[14]
Lee, B. T., Kim, K. J., and Zoh, M. H. 1996. Working memory and language: Comprehension individual differences in reading span and language processing. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 8(1): 59--85.
[15]
King, J., and Just, M. A. 1991. Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30: 580--602.

Index Terms

  1. Expectation-based sentence comprehension in Korean: evidence from behavioral and neurological studies

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ICUIMC '14: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication
      January 2014
      757 pages
      ISBN:9781450326445
      DOI:10.1145/2557977
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 09 January 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Korean
      2. brain localization
      3. expectation
      4. fMRI
      5. human sentence processing
      6. individual differences
      7. working memory capacity

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      ICUIMC '14
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      ICUIMC '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 116 of 407 submissions, 29%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 251 of 941 submissions, 27%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 62
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 01 Nov 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media