Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2559206.2581207acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Resumption lag at interruptible timing might not be short in actual environment

Published: 26 April 2014 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Experiments performed in controlled environments have revealed that interruptions occurring at application switching (AS), which correspond to task breakpoints in the computer field, are more subjectively acceptable and require shorter resumption lags (RL), which indicate the cognitive cost. Therefore, in this study, we investigate RLs in uncontrolled office environment. The interruptions at more acceptable ASs were expected to show shorter RLs, because the cognitive costs of the interruption are less. However, contrary to the expected result, the RLs were longer. This implies that factors other than cognitive cost may affect interruptibility in a realistic environment.

    Supplementary Material

    ZIP File (wip0295-file3.zip)
    Zip file containing a PDF of the Accompanying Poster

    References

    [1]
    Altman, E. M., and Trafton, J. G. Memory for goals: An activation-based model. Cognitive Science, 26(1) (2002), 39--83.
    [2]
    Cutrell, E. B., Czerwinski, M., and Horvitz, E. Effects of instant messaging interruptions on computing tasks. Proc.CHI2000 (2000), 99--100.
    [3]
    Czerwinski, M., Horvitz, E., and Wilhite, S. A diary study of task switching and interruptions. Proc.CHI'04 (2004), 175--182.
    [4]
    Iqbal, S. T., and Bailey, B. P. Leveraging characteristics of task structure to predict costs of interruption. Proc. CHI2006 (2006), 741--750.
    [5]
    Jin, J., and Dabbish, L. A. Self-interruption on the computer: A typology of discretionary task interleaving. Proc.CHI2009 (2009),1799--1808.
    [6]
    Mark, G., Gonzalez, V. M., and Harris, J. No task left behind : Examining the nature of fragmented work. Proc. CHI'05 (2005), 321--330.
    [7]
    Mark, G., Gudith, D., and Klocke, U. The cost of interrupted work: More speed and stress. Proc.CHI2008 (2008), 107--110.
    [8]
    Monk, C. A., Trafton, J. G., and Boehm-Davis, D. A. The effect of interruption duration and demand on resuming suspended goals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14 (2008), 299--313.
    [9]
    Salvucci, D. D., and Taatgen, N. A. Threaded cognition: An integrated theory of concurrent multitasking. Psychological Review, 115, 1 (2008), 101--130.
    [10]
    Salvucci, D. D. On reconstruction of task context after interruption. Proc.CHI2010 (2010), 89--92.
    [11]
    Tanaka, T., and Fujita, K. Study of user interruptibility estimation based on focused application switching, Proc. CSCW2011 (2011), 721--724.
    [12]
    Trafton, J. G., Altman, E. M., Brock, P. and Mintz, F. E. Preparing to resume an interrupted task: Effects of prospective goal encoding and retrospective rehearsal, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58 (2003), 583--603.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2017)Productivity Enhancing Interruption-Information Management Chat InterfaceJournal of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics10.20965/jaciii.2017.p045621:3(456-466)Online publication date: 19-May-2017
    • (2016)Interruption-Information Management Framework for Chat Interface2016 Joint 8th International Conference on Soft Computing and Intelligent Systems (SCIS) and 17th International Symposium on Advanced Intelligent Systems (ISIS)10.1109/SCIS-ISIS.2016.0137(631-636)Online publication date: Aug-2016

    Index Terms

    1. Resumption lag at interruptible timing might not be short in actual environment

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '14: CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2014
      2620 pages
      ISBN:9781450324748
      DOI:10.1145/2559206
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 26 April 2014

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. application switching.
      2. cognitive cost
      3. interruptibility
      4. task breakpoint

      Qualifiers

      • Poster

      Conference

      CHI '14
      Sponsor:
      CHI '14: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 26 - May 1, 2014
      Ontario, Toronto, Canada

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 1,000 of 3,200 submissions, 31%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI PLAY '24
      The Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play
      October 14 - 17, 2024
      Tampere , Finland

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2017)Productivity Enhancing Interruption-Information Management Chat InterfaceJournal of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics10.20965/jaciii.2017.p045621:3(456-466)Online publication date: 19-May-2017
      • (2016)Interruption-Information Management Framework for Chat Interface2016 Joint 8th International Conference on Soft Computing and Intelligent Systems (SCIS) and 17th International Symposium on Advanced Intelligent Systems (ISIS)10.1109/SCIS-ISIS.2016.0137(631-636)Online publication date: Aug-2016

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media