Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2567948.2579030acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An article level metric in the context of research community

Published: 07 April 2014 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    With the rapid increase of research papers, article-level metrics are of growing importance for helping researchers select papers. Classical metrics have a significant drawback of just using single factor, which limits the effectiveness of assessing papers in different periods after publication. Moreover, with the development of web 2.0, some new factors are introduced to assess papers. So, a novel article level metric in the context of research community (ALM_RC) is proposed. It integrates the impact of different factors comprehensively, because different factors have different time features and can complement each other in different periods after publication. In addition, as a research community is based on certain research directions, it is a relatively stable environment with related journals and scholars contributing their efforts to development of this research field. So in the context of research community, it is consistent, practical and reasonable to calculate the impact of the journals and scholars under relatively fair criteria. Experimental results show the novel metric is effective and robust in assessing papers.

    References

    [1]
    E. Adie and W. Roe. Altmetric: enriching scholarly content with article-level discussion and metrics. Learned Publishing, 26(1):11--17, 2013.
    [2]
    S. G. Aoun, B. R. Bendok, R. J. Rahme, R. G. Dacey Jr, and H. H. Batjer. Standardizing the evaluation of scientific and academic performance in neurosurgery-critical review of the "h" index and its variants. World Neurosurgery, 2012.
    [3]
    J. Bar-Ilan, S. Haustein, I. Peters, J. Priem, H. Shema, and J. Terliesner. Beyond citations: Scholars' visibility on the social web. arXiv preprint arXiv:1205.5611, 2012.
    [4]
    T. Bogers and A. Van den Bosch. Recommending scientific articles using citeulike. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Recommender systems, pages 287--290. ACM, 2008.
    [5]
    J. Bollen, M. Rodriquez, and H. Van de Sompel. Journal status. Scientometrics, 69(3):669--687, 2006.
    [6]
    L. Bornmann, W. Marx, A. Y. Gasparyan, and G. D. Kitas. Diversity, value and limitations of the journal impact factor and alternative metrics. Rheumatology international, 32(7):1861--1867, 2012.
    [7]
    G. Eysenbach. Can tweets predict citations? metrics of social impact based on twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(4), 2011.
    [8]
    S. Fausto, F. A. Machado, L. F. J. Bento, A. Iamarino, T. R. Nahas, and D. S. Munger. Research blogging: Indexing and registering the change in science 2.0. PloS one, 7(12):e50109, 2012.
    [9]
    E. Garfield. Journal impact factor: a brief review. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 161(8):979--980, 1999.
    [10]
    J. Hirsch. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United states of America, 102(46):16569, 2005.
    [11]
    R. Leimu and J. Koricheva. What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(1):28--32, 2005.
    [12]
    J. Letierce, A. Passant, J. Breslin, and S. Decker. Understanding how twitter is used to spread scientific messages. 2010.
    [13]
    X. Li and M. Thelwall. F1000, mendeley and traditional bibliometric indicators. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators. Montréal, Canada, pages 451--551, 2012.
    [14]
    C. Neylon and S. Wu. Article-level metrics and the evolution of scientific impact. PLoS biology, 7(11):e1000242, 2009.
    [15]
    M. Nielsen. Doing science in the open. 2011.
    [16]
    J. Priem and B. Hemminger. Scientometrics 2.0: New metrics of scholarly impact on the social web. First Monday, 15(7), 2010.
    [17]
    J. Priem, H. A. Piwowar, and B. M. Hemminger. Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact. arXiv preprint arXiv:1203.4745, 2012.
    [18]
    D. Taraborelli. Soft peer review: Social software and distributed scientific evaluation. 2008.
    [19]
    D. Torres, Á. Cabezas, and E. Jiménez. Altmetrics: New indicators for scientific communication in web 2.0. Comunicar, 21(41), 2013.
    [20]
    E. Van Nierop. Why do statistics journals have low impact factors' Statistica Neerlandica, 63(1):52--62, 2009.
    [21]
    K. Weller, E. Dröge, and C. Puschmann. Citation analysis in twitter. approaches for defining and measuring information flows within tweets during scientific conferences. In Proceedings of Making Sense of Microposts Workshop (# MSM2011). Co-located with Extended Semantic Web Conference, Crete, Greece, 2011.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2016)A graphical article-level metric for intuitive comparison of large-scale literaturesScientometrics10.1007/s11192-015-1782-4106:1(41-50)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2016
    • (2016)Scholarly Output Graph: A Graphical Article-Level Metric Indicating the Impact of a Scholar’s PublicationsAdvanced Data Mining and Applications10.1007/978-3-319-49586-6_40(567-579)Online publication date: 13-Nov-2016
    • (2015)Science Navigation MapProceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web10.1145/2740908.2741733(591-596)Online publication date: 18-May-2015

    Index Terms

    1. An article level metric in the context of research community

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        WWW '14 Companion: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web
        April 2014
        1396 pages
        ISBN:9781450327459
        DOI:10.1145/2567948
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Sponsors

        • IW3C2: International World Wide Web Conference Committee

        In-Cooperation

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 07 April 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. article level metrics
        2. citation
        3. research community
        4. social bookmark

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Conference

        WWW '14
        Sponsor:
        • IW3C2

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2016)A graphical article-level metric for intuitive comparison of large-scale literaturesScientometrics10.1007/s11192-015-1782-4106:1(41-50)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2016
        • (2016)Scholarly Output Graph: A Graphical Article-Level Metric Indicating the Impact of a Scholar’s PublicationsAdvanced Data Mining and Applications10.1007/978-3-319-49586-6_40(567-579)Online publication date: 13-Nov-2016
        • (2015)Science Navigation MapProceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web10.1145/2740908.2741733(591-596)Online publication date: 18-May-2015

        View Options

        Get Access

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media