Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2600057.2602846acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Expressiveness and robustness of first-price position auctions

Published: 01 June 2014 Publication History

Abstract

It is desirable for an economic mechanism that its properties hold in a robust way across multiple equilibria and under varying assumptions regarding the information available to the participants. In this paper we focus on the design of position auctions and seek mechanisms that guarantee high revenue in every efficient equilibrium under both complete and incomplete information. Our main result identifies a generalized first-price auction with multi-dimensional bids as the only standard design capable of achieving this goal, even though valuations are one-dimensional. The fact that expressiveness beyond the valuation space is necessary for robustness provides an interesting counterpoint to previous work, which has highlighted the benefits of simple bid spaces. From a technical perspective, our results are interesting because they establish equilibrium existence for a multi-dimensional bid space, where standard techniques for establishing equilibrium existence break down.

References

[1]
Abrams, Z., Ghosh, A., and Vee, E. 2009. Cost of conciseness in sponsored search auctions. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Internet and Network Economics. 326--334.
[2]
Aggarwal, G., Muthukrishnan, S., Pál, D., and Pál, M. 2009. General auction mechanism for search advertising. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web. 241--250.
[3]
Babaioff, M., Lucier, B., Paes Leme, R., and Nisan, N. 2014. On the efficiency of the Walrasian mechanism. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation. Forthcoming.
[4]
Benisch, M., Sadeh, N., and Sandholm, T. 2008. A theory of expressiveness in mechanisms. In Proceedings of the 23rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 17--23.
[5]
Bernheim, B. D. and Whinston, M. D. 1986. Menu auctions, resource allocation and economic influence. Quarterly Journal of Economics 101, 1--31.
[6]
Bhawalkar, K. and Roughgarden, T. 2011. Welfare guarantees for combinatorial auctions with item bidding. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms. 700--709.
[7]
Blumrosen, L., Hartline, J., and Nong, S. 2008. Position auctions and non-uniform conversion rates. In Proceedings of the 8th Ad Auctions Workshop. 1--11.
[8]
Caragiannis, I., Kaklamanis, C., Kanellopoulos, P., and Kyropoulou, M. 2011. On the efficiency of equilibria in generalized second price auctions. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. 81--90.
[9]
Caragiannis, I., Kaklamanis, C., Kanellopoulos, P., and Kyropoulou, M. 2012. Revenue guarantees in sponsored search auctions. In Proceedings of the 20th European Symposium on Algorithms. 253--264.
[10]
Chawla, S. and Hartline, J. 2013. Auctions with unique equilibria. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. 181--196.
[11]
Christodoulou, G., Kovács, A., and Schapira, M. 2008. Bayesian combinatorial auctions. In Proceedings of the 35th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming. 820--832.
[12]
Constantin, F., Rao, M., Huang, C.-C., and Parkes, D. C. 2011. On expressing value externalities in position auctions. In Proceedings of the 25th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 644--649.
[13]
Day, R. and Milgrom, P. 2008. Core-selecting package auctions. International Journal of Game Theory 36, 3, 393--407.
[14]
Dobzinski, S., Lavi, R., and Nisan, N. 2012. Multi-unit auctions with budget limits. Games and Economic Behavior 74, 2, 486--503.
[15]
Dütting, P., Fischer, F., and Parkes, D. C. 2011a. Simplicity-expressiveness tradeoffs in mechanism design. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. 341--350.
[16]
Dütting, P., Henzinger, M., and Starnberger, M. 2012. Auctions for heterogeneous items and budget limits. In Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Internet and Network Economics. 44--57.
[17]
Dütting, P., Henzinger, M., and Starnberger, M. 2013. Valuation compressions in VCG-based combinatorial auctions. In Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Web and Internet Economics. 146--159.
[18]
Dütting, P., Henzinger, M., and Weber, I. 2011b. An expressive mechanism for auctions on the web. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web. 127--136.
[19]
Edelman, B., Ostrovsky, M., and Schwartz, M. 2007. Internet advertising and the generalized second price auction: Selling billions of dollars worth of keywords. American Economic Review 97, 1, 242--259.
[20]
Feldman, M., Fu, H., Gravin, N., and Lucier, B. 2013. Simultaneous auctions are (almost) efficient. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. 201--210.
[21]
Gairing, M. 2009. Covering games: Approximation through non-cooperation. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Internet and Network Economics. 184--195.
[22]
Ghosh, A. and Sayedi, A. 2010. Expressive auctions for externalities in online advertising. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web. 371--380.
[23]
Goel, G., Mirrokni, V. S., and Paes Leme, R. 2012. Polyhedral clinching auctions and the adwords polytope. In Proceedings of the 44th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. 107--122.
[24]
Gomes, R. D. and Sweeney, K. S. 2009. Bayes-Nash equilibria of the generalized second price auction. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. 107--108.
[25]
Gul, F. and Stacchetti, E. 1999. Walrasian equilibrium with gross substitutes. Journal of Economic Theory 87, 1, 95--124.
[26]
Hassidim, A., Kaplan, H., Mansour, Y., and Nisan, N. 2011. Non-price equilibria in markets of discrete goods. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. 295--296.
[27]
Hoppe, H. C., Moldovanu, B., and Sela, A. 2009. The theory of assortative matching based on costly signals. Review of Economic Studies 76, 1, 253--281.
[28]
Hoy, D., Jain, K., and Wilkens, C. A. 2013. A dynamic axiomatic approach to first-price auctions. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. 583--584.
[29]
Lucier, B. and Paes Leme, R. 2011. GSP auctions with correlated types. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. 71--80.
[30]
Lucier, B., Paes Leme, R., and Tardos, E. 2012. On revenue in the generalized second price auction. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web. 361--370.
[31]
Milgrom, P. 2004. Putting Auction Theory to Work. Cambridge University Press.
[32]
Milgrom, P. 2010. Simplified mechanisms with an application to sponsored-search auctions. Games and Economic Behavior 70, 1, 62--70.
[33]
Myerson, R. 1981. Optimal auction design. Mathematics of Operations Research 6, 58--73.
[34]
Paes Leme, R. and Tardos, E. 2010. Pure and Bayes-Nash price of anarchy for generalized second price auction. In Proceedings of the 51st Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. 735--744.
[35]
Syrgkanis, V. and Tardos, E. 2013. Composable and efficient mechanisms. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. 211--220.
[36]
Varian, H. 2007. Position auctions. International Journal of Industrial Organization 25, 1163--1178.

Cited By

View all
  • (2016)Interpolating between truthful and non-truthful mechanisms for combinatorial auctionsProceedings of the twenty-seventh annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms10.5555/2884435.2884534(1444-1457)Online publication date: 10-Jan-2016
  • (2016)Efficient Advert AssignmentOperations Research10.1287/opre.2016.151964:4(822-837)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2016

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
EC '14: Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM conference on Economics and computation
June 2014
1028 pages
ISBN:9781450325653
DOI:10.1145/2600057
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 June 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. generalized first-price auction
  2. simplicity-expressiveness tradeoffs
  3. target-profit strategies

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

EC '14
Sponsor:
EC '14: ACM Conference on Economics and Computation
June 8 - 12, 2014
California, Palo Alto, USA

Acceptance Rates

EC '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 80 of 290 submissions, 28%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 664 of 2,389 submissions, 28%

Upcoming Conference

EC '25
The 25th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation
July 7 - 11, 2025
Stanford , CA , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 25 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2016)Interpolating between truthful and non-truthful mechanisms for combinatorial auctionsProceedings of the twenty-seventh annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms10.5555/2884435.2884534(1444-1457)Online publication date: 10-Jan-2016
  • (2016)Efficient Advert AssignmentOperations Research10.1287/opre.2016.151964:4(822-837)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2016

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media