Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2600057.2602850acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

On the efficiency of the walrasian mechanism

Published: 01 June 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Central results in economics guarantee the existence of efficient equilibria for various classes of markets. An underlying assumption in early work is that agents are price-takers, i.e., agents honestly report their true demand in response to prices. A line of research in economics, initiated by Hurwicz (1972), is devoted to understanding how such markets perform when agents are strategic about their demands. This is captured by the Walrasian Mechanism that proceeds by collecting reported demands, finding clearing prices in the reported market via an ascending price tatonnement procedure, and returns the resulting allocation. Similar mechanisms are used, for example, in the daily opening of the New York Stock Exchange and the call market for copper and gold in London.
In practice, it is commonly observed that agents in such markets reduce their demand leading to behaviors resembling bargaining and to inefficient outcomes. We ask how inefficient the equilibria can be. Our main result is that the welfare of every pure Nash equilibrium of the Walrasian mechanism is at least one quarter of the optimal welfare, when players have gross substitute valuations and do not overbid. Previous analysis of the Walrasian mechanism have resorted to large market assumptions to show convergence to efficiency in the limit. Our result shows that approximate efficiency is guaranteed regardless of the size of the market.
We extend our results in several directions. First, our results extend to Bayes-Nash equilibria and outcomes of no regret learning via the smooth mechanism framework.
We also extend our bounds to any mechanism that maximizes welfare with respect to the declared valuations and never charges agents more than their bids. Additionally, we consider other classes of valuations and bid spaces beyond those satisfying the gross substitutes conditions. Finally, we relax the no-overbidding assumption, and present bounds that are parameterized by the extent to which agents are willing to overbid.

References

[1]
ADSUL, B., BABU, C. S., GARG, J., MEHTA, R., AND SOHONI, M. A. 2010. Nash equilibria in fisher market. In SAGT. 30--41.
[2]
AZEVEDO, E. M. AND BUDISH, E. 2012. Strategyproofness in the large as a desideratum for market design. In ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. 55.
[3]
BHAWALKAR, K. 2013. Approximation guarantees for game theoretical equilibria. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University.
[4]
BHAWALKAR, K. AND ROUGHGARDEN, T. 2011. Welfare guarantees for combinatorial auctions with item bidding. In SODA. 700--709.
[5]
CHEN, N., DENG, X., ZHANG, H., AND ZHANG, J. 2012. Incentive ratios of fisher markets. In ICALP (2). 464--475.
[6]
CHEN, N., DENG, X., AND ZHANG, J. 2011. How profitable are strategic behaviors in a market' In ESA. 106--118.
[7]
CHEUNG, Y. K., COLE, R., AND DEVANUR, N. R. 2013. Tatonnement beyond gross substitutes': gradient descent to the rescue. In STOC. 191--200.
[8]
CHRISTODOULOU, G., KOVACS, A., AND SCHAPIRA, M. 2008. Bayesian combinatorialauctions. In ICALP (1). 820--832.
[9]
DEKEIJZER, B., MARKAKIS, E., SCHAFER, G., AND TELELIS, O. 2013. On the inefficiency of standard multi-unit auctions. CoRR abs/1303--1646.
[10]
DEMANGE, G., GALE, D., AND SOTOMAYOR, M. 1986. Multi-item auctions. Journal of Political Economy 94, 4, 863--72.
[11]
DOBZINSKI, S., NISAN, N., AND OREN, S. 2014. Economic efficiency requires interaction. CoRR abs/1311.4721.
[12]
DUTTING, P., HENZINGER, M., AND STARNBERGER, M. 2013. Valuation compressions in vcg-based combinatorial auctions. In WINE.
[13]
FELDMAN, M., FU, H., GRAVIN, N., AND LUCIER, B. 2013. Simultaneous auctions are(almost) efficient. In STOC. 201--210.
[14]
FU, H., KLEINBERG, R., AND LAVI, R. 2012. Conditional equilibrium outcomes via ascending price processes with applications to combinatorial auctions with item bidding. In ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. 586.
[15]
FUJISHIGE, S. AND TAMURA, A. 2007. A two-sided discrete-concave market with possibly bounded side payments: An approach by discrete convex analysis. Mathematics of Operations Research 32, 1, pp. 136--155.
[16]
GUL, F. AND STACCHETTI, E. 1999. Walrasian equilibrium with gross substitutes.Journal of Economic Theory 87, 1, 95--124.
[17]
GUL, F. AND STACCHETTI, E. 2000. The english auction with differentiated commodities. J. Economic Theory 92, 1, 66--95.
[18]
HASSIDIM, A., KAPLAN, H., MANSOUR, Y., AND NISAN, N. 2011. Non-price equilibria in markets of discrete goods. In ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. 295--296.
[19]
HURWICZ, L. 1972. On Informationally Decentralized Systems. In Decision and Organization: A volume in Honor of Jacob Marschak, C. B. McGuire and R. Radner, Eds. Studies in Mathematical and Managerial Economics Series, vol. 12. North-Holland, Amsterdam, Chapter 14, 297--336.
[20]
JACKSON, M. O. AND MANELLI, A. M. 1994. Approximate competitive equilibria in large economies. Discussion Papers 1101, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science. Sept.
[21]
KELSO, A. AND CRAWFORD, V. 1982. Job matching, coalition formation, and gross substitutes. Econometrica 50, 6, 1483--1504.
[22]
LEHMANN, B., LEHMANN, D. J., AND NISAN, N. 2006. Combinatorial auctions with decreasing marginal utilities. Games and Economic Behavior 55, 2, 270--296.
[23]
LUCIER, B. AND PAES LEME, R. 2011. Gsp auctions with correlated types. In ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. 71--80.
[24]
MARKAKIS, E. AND TELELIS, O. 2012. Uniform price auctions: Equilibria and efficiency. In SAGT. 227--238.
[25]
MUROTA, K. 1996. Convexity and steinitz's exchange property. Advances in Mathematics 124, 2, 272--311.
[26]
MUROTA, K. AND TAMURA, A. 2003. New characterizations of m-convex functions and their applications to economic equilibrium models with indivisibilities. Discrete Applied Mathematics 131, 2, 495--512.
[27]
NISAN, N. AND SEGAL, I. 2006. The communication requirements of efficient allocations and supporting prices. J. Economic Theory 129, 1, 192--224.
[28]
OTANI, Y. AND SICILIAN, J. 1982. Equilibrium allocations of walrasian preference games. Journal of Economic Theory 27, 1, 47--68.
[29]
OTANI, Y. AND SICILIAN, J. 1990. Limit properties of equilibrium allocations of walrasian strategic games. Journal of Economic Theory 51, 2, 295--312.
[30]
PAES LEME, R., SYRGKANIS, V., AND TARDOS, E. 2012. Sequential auctions and externalities. In SODA. 869--886.
[31]
ROBERTS, D. J. AND POSTLEWAITE, A. 1976. The incentives for price-taking behavior in large exchange economies. Econometrica 44, 1, 115--27.
[32]
ROUGHGARDEN, T. 2009. Intrinsic robustness of the price of anarchy. In STOC. 513--522.
[33]
ROUGHGARDEN, T. 2012. The price of anarchy in games of incomplete information. In ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. 862--879.
[34]
RUSTICHINI, A., SATTERTHWAITE, M. A., AND WILLIAMS, S. R. 1994. Convergence to efficiency in a simple market with incomplete information. Econometrica 62, 5, 1041--63.
[35]
SATTERTHWAITE, M. A. AND WILLIAMS, S. R. 2002. The optimality of a simple market mechanism. Econometrica 70, 5, 1841--1863.
[36]
SYRGKANIS, V. 2012. Bayesian games and the smoothness framework. CoRR abs/1203.5155.
[37]
SYRGKANIS, V. AND TARDOS, E. 2012. Bayesian sequential auctions. In ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. 929--944.
[38]
SYRGKANIS, V. AND TARDOS, E. 2013. Composable and efficient mechanisms. In STOC. 211--220.
[39]
WALRAS, L. 1874. Elements of Pure Economics: Or the Theory of Social Wealth. Elements of Pure Economics, Or the Theory of Social Wealth. Taylor & Francis.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Online Combinatorial Assignment in Independence SystemsInteger Programming and Combinatorial Optimization10.1007/978-3-031-59835-7_22(294-308)Online publication date: 22-May-2024
  • (2023)Learning and collusion in multi-unit auctionsProceedings of the 37th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems10.5555/3666122.3667097(22191-22225)Online publication date: 10-Dec-2023
  • (2023)Optimal item pricing in online combinatorial auctionsMathematical Programming10.1007/s10107-023-02027-2206:1-2(429-460)Online publication date: 28-Oct-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. On the efficiency of the walrasian mechanism

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    EC '14: Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM conference on Economics and computation
    June 2014
    1028 pages
    ISBN:9781450325653
    DOI:10.1145/2600057
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 June 2014

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. combinatorial auctions
    2. price of anarchy
    3. walrasian equilibrium

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    EC '14
    Sponsor:
    EC '14: ACM Conference on Economics and Computation
    June 8 - 12, 2014
    California, Palo Alto, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    EC '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 80 of 290 submissions, 28%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 664 of 2,389 submissions, 28%

    Upcoming Conference

    EC '25
    The 25th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation
    July 7 - 11, 2025
    Stanford , CA , USA

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Online Combinatorial Assignment in Independence SystemsInteger Programming and Combinatorial Optimization10.1007/978-3-031-59835-7_22(294-308)Online publication date: 22-May-2024
    • (2023)Learning and collusion in multi-unit auctionsProceedings of the 37th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems10.5555/3666122.3667097(22191-22225)Online publication date: 10-Dec-2023
    • (2023)Optimal item pricing in online combinatorial auctionsMathematical Programming10.1007/s10107-023-02027-2206:1-2(429-460)Online publication date: 28-Oct-2023
    • (2022)Nash Social Welfare Approximation for Strategic AgentsOperations Research10.1287/opre.2020.205670:1(402-415)Online publication date: Jan-2022
    • (2022)Recent studies of agent incentives in internet resource allocation and pricingAnnals of Operations Research10.1007/s10479-021-04482-6314:1(49-76)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2022
    • (2022)Optimal Item Pricing in Online Combinatorial AuctionsInteger Programming and Combinatorial Optimization10.1007/978-3-031-06901-7_10(126-139)Online publication date: 27-May-2022
    • (2021)A dominant strategy double clock auction with estimation‐based tâtonnementTheoretical Economics10.3982/TE331116:3(943-978)Online publication date: 2021
    • (2021)Algorithms as MechanismsMathematics of Operations Research10.1287/moor.2020.105846:1(317-335)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2021
    • (2018)MUDAProceedings of the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirtieth Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference and Eighth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence10.5555/3504035.3504181(1193-1201)Online publication date: 2-Feb-2018
    • (2018)Double auctions in markets for multiple kinds of goodsProceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence10.5555/3304415.3304485(489-497)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2018
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media