research-article

Cheating in Online Games: A Social Network Perspective

Authors:

Jeremy Blackburn,

Nicolas Kourtellis,

Adriana IamnitchiAuthors Info & Claims

ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT), Volume 13, Issue 3

Article No.: 9, Pages 1 - 25

https://doi.org/10.1145/2602570

Published: 01 May 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Online gaming is a multi-billion dollar industry that entertains a large, global population. One unfortunate phenomenon, however, poisons the competition and spoils the fun: cheating. The costs of cheating span from industry-supported expenditures to detect and limit it, to victims’ monetary losses due to cyber crime.

This article studies cheaters in the Steam Community, an online social network built on top of the world’s dominant digital game delivery platform. We collected information about more than 12 million gamers connected in a global social network, of which more than 700 thousand have their profiles flagged as cheaters. We also observed timing information of the cheater flags, as well as the dynamics of the cheaters’ social neighborhoods.

We discovered that cheaters are well embedded in the social and interaction networks: their network position is largely indistinguishable from that of fair players. Moreover, we noticed that the number of cheaters is not correlated with the geographical, real-world population density, or with the local popularity of the Steam Community. Also, we observed a social penalty involved with being labeled as a cheater: cheaters lose friends immediately after the cheating label is publicly applied.

Most importantly, we observed that cheating behavior spreads through a social mechanism: the number of cheater friends of a fair player is correlated with the likelihood of her becoming a cheater in the future. This allows us to propose ideas for limiting cheating contagion.

Supplementary Material

PDF File (a9-blackburn_appendix.pdf)

The proof is given in an electronic appendix, available online in the ACM Digital Library.

Download
144.06 KB

References

[1]

Ahmad, M., Keegan, B., Sullivan, S., Williams, D., Srivastava, J., and Contractor, N. 2011. Illicit bits: Detecting and analyzing contraband networks in massively multiplayer online games. In Proceedings of the IEEE 3rd International Conference on Social Computing (SocCom’11). IEEE, 127--134.

[2]

APB Reloaded Dev Blog. 2011. http://goo.gl/m9klr.

[3]

Ariely, D. 2012. The (Honest) Truth About Dishonesty: How We Lie to Everyone---Especially Ourselves. Harper.

[4]

Balint, M., Posea, V., Dimitriu, A., and Iosup, A. 2011. An analysis of social gaming networks in online and face-to-face bridge communities. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Large-Scale System and Application Performance. ACM, 35--42.

Digital Library

[5]

Blackburn, J. and Iamnitchi, A. 2013. Relationships under the microscope with interaction-backed social networks. In Proceeding of the 1st International Conference on Internet Science.

[6]

Blackburn, J., Simha, R., Kourtellis, N., Zuo, X., Ripeanu, M., Skvoretz, J., and Iamnitchi, A. 2012. Branded with a scarlet “C”: Cheaters in a gaming social network. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 81--90.

Digital Library

[7]

Carrell, S., Malmstrom, F., and West, J. 2008. Peer effects in academic cheating. J. Human Resources 43, 1, 173--207.

[8]

Chambers, C., Feng, W.-C., Sahu, S., Saha, D., and Brandt, D. 2010. Characterizing online games. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 18, 3, 899--910.

Digital Library

[9]

Claypool, M., LaPoint, D., and Winslow, J. 2003. Network analysis of counter-strike and Starcraft. In Conference Proceedings of the IEEE International Performance, Computing, and Communications Conference. 261--268.

[10]

Consalvo, M. 2007. Cheating: Gaining Advantage in Videogames. 1st Ed. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA.

Digital Library

[11]

Cross, T. 2011. All the world’s a game. http://www.economist.com/node/21541164.

[12]

Deterding, S., Sicart, M., Nacke, L., O’Hara, K., and Dixon, D. 2011. Gamification. Using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’11). ACM, 2425--2428.

Digital Library

[13]

Ducheneaut, N., Yee, N., Nickell, E., and Moore, R. J. 2007. The life and death of online gaming communities: A look at guilds in world of warcraft. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’07). ACM.

Digital Library

[14]

Duh, H. B.-L. and Chen, V. H. H. 2009. Cheating behaviors in online gaming. Online Commun. Social Comput. 5621, 1--7.

Digital Library

[15]

Dumitrica, D. D. 2011. An exploration of cheating in a virtual gaming world. J. Gam. Virt. Worlds 3, 1, 21--36.

[16]

Feng, W., Chang, F., Feng, W., and Walpole, J. 2005. A traffic characterization of popular on-line games. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 13, 488--500.

Digital Library

[17]

Feng, W.-C., Chang, F., Feng, W.-c., and Walpole, J. 2002. Provisioning on-line games: A traffic analysis of a busy counter-strike server. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Internet Measurment. ACM, 151--156.

Digital Library

[18]

Feng, W.-C. and Feng, W.-c. 2003. On the geographic distribution of on-line game servers and players. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Network and System Support for Games (NetGames’03). ACM, 173--179.

Digital Library

[19]

Fitocracy, Inc. 2012. Fitocracy. http://www.fitocracy.com.

[20]

Foursquare Labs, Inc. 2012. Foursquare. http://www.foursquare.com.

[21]

Fritsch, T., Voigt, B., and Schiller, J. 2006. Distribution of online hardcore player behavior: (how hardcore are you?). In Proceedings of 5th ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Network and System Support for Games. ACM, USA.

Digital Library

[22]

Gartner. 2011. Gartner says by 2015, more than 50 percent of organizations that manage innovation processes will gamify those processes. http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/1629214.

[23]

Giles, J. 2010. Inside the race to hack the kinect. New Scientist 208, 2789, 22--23.

[24]

Gino, F., Ayal, S., and Ariely, D. 2009. Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior: The effect of one bad apple on the barrel. Psych. Sci. 20, 3, 393--398.

[25]

Glas, R. 2011. Breaking reality: Exploring pervasive cheating in Foursquare. In Proceedings of DiGRA 2011, 1--15.

[26]

Gross, T., D’Lima, C. J. D., and Blasius, B. 2006. Epidemic dynamics on an adaptive network. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 208701.

[27]

Halotags. 2012. Halotags Halo 3 & Halo 4 MLG level 50 accounts for sale. http://www.halotags.com.

[28]

Hamari, J. and Lehdonvirta, V. 2010. Game design as marketing: How game mechanics create demand for virtual goods. Int. J. Bus. Sci. Appl. Man. 5, 1, 14--29.

[29]

He, W., Liu, X., and Ren, M. 2011. Location cheating: A security challenge to location-based social network services. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS). IEEE, 740--749.

Digital Library

[30]

Herbrich, R., Minka, T., and Graepel, T. 2007. Trueskill: A Bayesian skill rating system. Adv. Neural Inf. Proc. Syst. 19, 569.

[31]

Hothorn, T., Hornik, K., van de Wiel, M. A., and Zeileis, A. 2008. Implementing a class of permutation tests: The coin package. J. Stat. Softw. 28, 8, 1--23.

[32]

Huizinga, J. 1950. Home Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture. Beacon Press, Boston, MA.

[33]

Keegan, B., Ahmed, M., Williams, D., Srivastava, J., and Contractor, N. 2010. Dark gold: Statistical properties of clandestine networks in massively multiplayer online games. In Proceedings of the IEEE 2nd International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom). 201--208.

Digital Library

[34]

Kourtellis, N., Alahakoon, T., Simha, R., Iamnitchi, A., and Tripathi, R. 2012. Identifying high betweenness centrality nodes in large social networks. Social Netw. Anal. Mining, 1--16.

[35]

Ku, Y., Chen, Y., Wu, K., and Chiu, C. 2007. An empirical analysis of online gaming crime characteristics from 2002 to 2004. In Proceedings of PAISI 07. 34--45.

Digital Library

[36]

Kulik, B. W., O’Fallon, M. J., and Salimath, M. S. 2008. Do competitive environments lead to the rise and spread of unethical behavior? Parallels from Enron. J. Bus. Ethics 83, 4, 703--723.

[37]

Kushner, D. 2010. Steamed: Valve software battles video-game cheaters. http://goo.gl/wWgq6n.

[38]

Landers, R. and Callan, R. 2011. Casual social games as serious games: The psychology of gamification in undergraduate education and employee training. Serious Games and Edutainment Applications, 399--423.

[39]

Lin, R. and Zhu, X. 2012. Leveraging social media for preventive care-a gamification system and insights. Stud. Health Tech. Informat. 180, 838.

[40]

Longini, I. M., Nizam, A., Xu, S., Ungchusak, K., Hanshaoworakul, W., Cummings, D. A. T., and Halloran, M. E. 2005. Containing pandemic influenza at the source. Science 309, 5737, 1083--1087.

[41]

Mason, W. and Clauset, A. 2013. Friends FTW! Friendship and competition in Halo: Reach. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 375--386.

Digital Library

[42]

Nazir, A., Raza, S., Chuah, C.-N., and Schipper, B. 2010. Ghostbusting facebook: Detecting and characterizing phantom profiles in online social gaming applications. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Online Social Networks (WOSN’10).

Digital Library

[43]

Onnela, J.-P., Saramäki, J., Hyvönen, J., Szabó, G., Lazer, D., Kaski, K., Kertész, J., and Barabási, A.-L. 2007. Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 104, 18, 7332--7336.

[44]

Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford University Press.

[45]

Pelechrinis, K., Krishnamurthy, P., and Zhang, K. 2012. Gaming the game: Honeypot venues against cheaters in location-based social networks. arXiv.

[46]

Re-logic. 2011. Terraria. http://store.steampowered.com/app/105600/.

[47]

Rettinger, D. and Kramer, Y. 2009. Situational and personal causes of student cheating. Res. High. Educat. 50, 293--313.

[48]

Ruan, Z., Tang, M., and Liu, Z. 2012. Epidemic spreading with information-driven vaccination. Phys. Rev. E 86, 036117.

[49]

Scellato, S., Mascolo, C., Musolesi, M., and Latora, V. 2010. Distance matters: Geo-social metrics for online social networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Online Social Networks (WOSN’10).

Digital Library

[50]

Sekhon, J. S. 2011. Multivariate and propensity score matching software with automated balance optimization: The matching package for r. J. Stat. Softw. 42, 7, 1--52.

[51]

Senior, T. 2011. Steam controls up to 70&percnt; of the PC download market and is “tremendously profitable”. http://goo.gl/MjgA3.

[52]

Staudt, S. 2011. Steam condenser. https://github.com/koraktor/steam-condenser.

[53]

Szell, M. and Thurner, S. 2010. Measuring social dynamics in a massive multiplayer online game. Social Netw. 32, 313--329.

[54]

Thom, J., Millen, D., and DiMicco, J. 2012. Removing gamification from an enterprise SNS. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’12). ACM, 1067--1070.

Digital Library

[55]

Trendy Entertainment. 2011. Dungeon Defenders. http://store.steampowered.com/app/65800/.

[56]

Valve. 2012a. The international - dota 2. http://www.dota2.com/international.

[57]

Valve. 2012b. Steam community update now live. http://store.steampowered.com/news/8788/.

[58]

Wei, X., Yang, J., Adamic, L., Araújo, R., and Rekhi, M. 2010. Diffusion dynamics of games on online social networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Online Social Networks (WOSN’10).

Digital Library

[59]

Werbach, K. and Hunter, D. 2012. For the Win: How Game Thinking Can Revolutionize Your Business. Wharton Digital Press.

[60]

Wilson, C., Boe, B., Sala, A., Puttaswamy, K. P. N., and Zhao, B. Y. 2009. User interactions in social networks and their implications. In Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Computer Systems. ACM, 205--218.

Digital Library

[61]

Xu, Y., Cao, X., Sellen, A., Herbrich, R., and Graepel, T. 2011. Sociable killers: understanding social relationships in an online first-person shooter game. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’11). ACM, 197--206.

Digital Library

Cited By

Joens AJillepalli ASheldon F(2024)Trustworthy High-Performance Multiplayer Games with Trust-but-Verify Protocol Sensor ValidationSensors10.3390/s2414473724:14(4737)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/s24144737
Chen JXia CPerc M(2024)The SIQRS Propagation Model With Quarantine on Simplicial ComplexesIEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems10.1109/TCSS.2024.335117311:3(4267-4278)Online publication date: Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2024.3351173
Orlova JStepanov AVinogradov AOrlova LBaldycheva ASomov A(2024)Estimation of In-Game Player Behavior by Measuring Key Gameplay Parameters2024 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC)10.1109/I2MTC60896.2024.10560715(1-6)Online publication date: 20-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/I2MTC60896.2024.10560715
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Cheating in Online Games: A Social Network Perspective

Recommendations

Branded with a scarlet "C": cheaters in a gaming social network
WWW '12: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web

Online gaming is a multi-billion dollar industry that entertains a large, global population. One unfortunate phenomenon, however, poisons the competition and the fun: cheating. The costs of cheating span from industry-supported expenditures to detect ...
The effects of collective MMORPG (Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Games) play on gamers' online and offline social capital

This study examines the impact of collective MMORPG play on gamers' social capital in both the virtual world and the real world. Collective MMORPG play is conceptualized as the frequency of joint gaming actions and gamers' assessment of the experience ...
The spreading impact of playing violent video games on aggression

Violent video game exposure has been shown to increase aggression in the player. The present research examines the idea that violent video game play does not only have an impact on the player, but also on the player's social network. In fact, egocentric ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Internet Technology

ACM Transactions on Internet Technology Volume 13, Issue 3

May 2014

97 pages

ISSN:1533-5399

EISSN:1557-6051

DOI:10.1145/2630790

Editor:
Munindar P. Singh
Department of Computer Science, North Carolina State University

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2014 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 May 2014

Accepted: 01 December 2013

Revised: 01 November 2013

Received: 01 February 2013

Published in TOIT Volume 13, Issue 3

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed

Funding Sources

Division of Computer and Network Systems

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

48
Total Citations
View Citations
1,822
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)182
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10

Reflects downloads up to 12 Aug 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Joens AJillepalli ASheldon F(2024)Trustworthy High-Performance Multiplayer Games with Trust-but-Verify Protocol Sensor ValidationSensors10.3390/s2414473724:14(4737)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/s24144737
Chen JXia CPerc M(2024)The SIQRS Propagation Model With Quarantine on Simplicial ComplexesIEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems10.1109/TCSS.2024.335117311:3(4267-4278)Online publication date: Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2024.3351173
Orlova JStepanov AVinogradov AOrlova LBaldycheva ASomov A(2024)Estimation of In-Game Player Behavior by Measuring Key Gameplay Parameters2024 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC)10.1109/I2MTC60896.2024.10560715(1-6)Online publication date: 20-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/I2MTC60896.2024.10560715
Vepsäläinen JKaakinen MSavolainen IHagfors HVuorinen IOksanen A(2024)Online communities as a risk factor for gambling and gaming problemsComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2024.108246157:COnline publication date: 17-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108246
Gursesli MMasti FDuradoni MBostan BSungu EZilbeyaz PGuazzini A(2024)Psychological and Behavioral Effects of League of Legends Rank System for Italian Competitive PlayersVideogame Sciences and Arts10.1007/978-3-031-51452-4_5(59-71)Online publication date: 3-Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51452-4_5
Kim HWoo J(2024)Detecting and Preventing Online Game Bots in MMORPGsEncyclopedia of Computer Graphics and Games10.1007/978-3-031-23161-2_13(577-584)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23161-2_13
Schrör SMüller FSchädlich F(2023)Überwachen und Strafen im Online-Gaming?Politiken des (digitalen) Spiels10.14361/9783839467909-017(279-290)Online publication date: 2-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839467909-017
Boldi ARapp A(2023)“Is It Legit, To You?”. An Exploration of Players’ Perceptions of Cheating in a Multiplayer Video Game: Making Sense of UncertaintyInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2023.220427640:15(4021-4041)Online publication date: 28-Apr-2023
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2204276
Sáez-Ortuño LForgas-Coll SHuertas-Garcia RSánchez-García J(2023)Online cheaters: Profiles and motivations of internet users who falsify their data onlineJournal of Innovation & Knowledge10.1016/j.jik.2023.1003498:2(100349)Online publication date: Apr-2023
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100349
Perez BMachado SAndrews JKourtellis NBaeza-Yates RWeller KPortela MSeneviratne OWeber IYasseri TBon ASrinivas SIbáñez L(2022)I call BS: Fraud Detection in Crowdfunding CampaignsProceedings of the 14th ACM Web Science Conference 202210.1145/3501247.3531541(1-11)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3501247.3531541
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents