research-article

Reading the source code of social ties

Authors:

Luca Maria Aiello,

Rossano Schifanella,

Bogdan StateAuthors Info & Claims

WebSci '14: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM conference on Web science

Pages 139 - 148

https://doi.org/10.1145/2615569.2615672

Published: 23 June 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Though online social network research has exploded during the past years, not much thought has been given to the exploration of the nature of social links. Online interactions have been interpreted as indicative of one social process or another (e.g., status exchange or trust), often with little systematic justification regarding the relation between observed data and theoretical concept. Our research aims to breach this gap in computational social science by proposing an unsupervised, parameter-free method to discover, with high accuracy, the fundamental domains of interaction occurring in social networks. By applying this method on two online datasets different by scope and type of interaction (aNobii and Flickr) we observe the spontaneous emergence of three domains of interaction representing the exchange of status, knowledge and social support. By finding significant relations between the domains of interaction and classic social network analysis issues (e.g., tie strength, dyadic interaction over time) we show how the network of interactions induced by the extracted domains can be used as a starting point for more nuanced analysis of online social data that may one day incorporate the normative grammar of social interaction. Our methods finds applications in online social media services ranging from recommendation to visual link summarization.

References

[1]

L. M. Aiello, M. Deplano, R. Schifanella, and G. Ruffo. People are Strange when you're a Stranger: Impact and Influence of Bots on Social Networks. In ICWSM, 2012.

[2]

T. Antonucci, R. Fuhrer, and J. Jackson. Social Support and Reciprocity: A Cross-Ethnic and Cross-National Perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7(4), 1990.

[3]

S. Arora, R. Ge, and A. Moitra. Learning Topic Models -- Going Beyond SVD. In FOCS, 2012.

Digital Library

[4]

L. Backstrom, J. Kleinberg, L. Lee, and C. Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil. Characterizing and Curating Conversation Threads: Expansion, Focus, Volume, Re-entry. In WSDM, 2013.

Digital Library

[5]

C. Bicchieri. The Grammar of Society: The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms. Cambridge University Press, 2006.

[6]

P. Blau. Exchange and Power in Social Life. Transaction Publishers, 1964.

[7]

d. boyd, S. Golder, and G. Lotan. Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter. In HICSS, 2010.

Digital Library

[8]

P. Bramsen, M. Escobar-Molano, A. Patel, and R. Alonso. Extracting Social Power Relationships from Natural Language. In Human Language Technologies - Volume 1. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2011.

Digital Library

[9]

C. Budak and R. Agrawal. On Participation in Group Chats on Twitter. In WWW, 2013.

Digital Library

[10]

F. Celli and L. Rossi. The Role of Emotional Stability in Twitter Conversations. In Workshop on Semantic Analysis in Social Media, 2012.

Digital Library

[11]

K. S. Cook and R. M. Emerson. Power, Equity and Commitment in Exchange Networks. American Sociological Review, 43(5), 1978.

[12]

T. Correa, A. W. Hinsley, and H. G. de Zúñiga. Who Interacts on the Web? The Intersection of Users? Personality and Social Media Use. Computers in Human Behaviour, 26(2), 2010.

Digital Library

[13]

C. Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, L. Lee, B. Pang, and J. Kleinberg. Echoes of Power: Language Effects and Power Differences in Social Interaction. In WWW, 2012.

Digital Library

[14]

M. De Choudhury, H. Sundaram, A. John, and D. D. Seligmann. What Makes Conversations Interesting? Themes, Participants and Consequences of Conversations in Online Social Media. In WWW, 2009.

Digital Library

[15]

S. DeDeo. Collective Phenomena and Non-Finite State Computation in a Human Social System. PLoS ONE, 8(10), 10 2013.

[16]

D. Derks, A. E. Bos, and J. v. Grumbkow. Emoticons and Social Interaction on the Internet: the Importance of Social Context. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 2007.

[17]

R. Emerson. Power-dependence Relations. American Sociological Review, 1962.

[18]

E. Foa and U. Foa. Resource Theory: Interpersonal Behavior as Exchange. In Social exchange: Advances in theory and research. Plenum Press, 1980.

[19]

P. Fogel, S. S. Young, D. M. Hawkins, and N. Ledirac. Inferential, Robust Non-negative Matrix Factorization Analysis of Microarray Data. Bioinformatics, 23(1), 2007.

Digital Library

[20]

S. Fortunato. Community Detection in Graphs. Physics Reports, 486(3--5), 2010.

[21]

J. L. Gastwirth. The estimation of the Lorenz curve and Gini index. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 54(3), 1972.

[22]

E. Gilbert and K. Karahalios. Predicting Tie Strength with Social Media. In CHI, 2009.

Digital Library

[23]

M. Gomez-Rodriguez, J. Leskovec, and B. Schölkopf. Structure and Dynamics of Information Pathways in Online Media. In WSDM, 2013.

Digital Library

[24]

R. V. Gould. The Origins of Status Hierarchies: A Formal Theory and Empirical Test. American Journal of Sociology, 107(5), 2002.

[25]

P. A. Grabowicz, L. M. Aiello, V. M. Eguiluz, and A. Jaimes. Distinguishing Topical and Social Groups Based on Common Identity and Bond theory. In WSDM, 2013.

Digital Library

[26]

P. A. Grabowicz, J. J. Ramasco, E. Moro, J. M. Pujol, and V. M. Eguiluz. Social Features of Online Networks: The Strength of Intermediary Ties in Online Social Media. PLoS ONE, 7(1), 2012.

[27]

M. S. Granovetter. The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 1973.

[28]

F. M. Harper, D. Frankowski, S. Drenner, Y. Ren, S. Kiesler, L. Terveen, R. Kraut, and J. Riedl. Talk Amongst Yourselves: Inviting Users to Participate in Online Conversations. In IUI, 2007.

Digital Library

[29]

C. Honeycutt and S. Herring. Beyond Microblogging: Conversation and Collaboration via Twitter. In HICSS, 2009.

[30]

J. House, D. Umberson, and K. Landis. Structures and Processes of Social Support. Annual Review of Sociology, 1988.

[31]

A. Java, X. Song, T. Finin, and B. Tseng. Why We Twitter: Understanding Microblogging Usage and Communities. In WebKDD/SNA-KDD, 2007.

Digital Library

[32]

S. Kim, J. Bak, and A. Oh. Do You Feel what I Feel? Social Aspects of Emotions in Twitter Conversations. In ICWSM, 2012.

[33]

R. Kumar, M. Mahdian, and M. McGlohon. Dynamics of Conversations. In KDD, 2010.

Digital Library

[34]

J. Leskovec, D. Huttenlocher, and J. Kleinberg. Predicting Positive and Negative Links in Online Social Networks. In WWW, 2010.

Digital Library

[35]

M. Mitrovic and B. Tadic. Dynamics of Bloggers? Communities: Bipartite Networks from Empirical Data and Agent-based Modeling. Physica A, 391(21), 2012.

[36]

M. E. J. Newman. Assortative Mixing in Networks. Phys. Rev. Lett., 89, 2002.

[37]

J. Pennebaker. The Secret Life of Pronouns: What Our Words Say About Us. Bloomsbury, 2013.

[38]

H. Purohit, Y. Ruan, D. Fuhry, S. Parthasarathy, and A. Sheth. On Understanding Divergence of Online Social Group Discussion. In ICWSM, 2014.

[39]

D. Ramage, S. Dumais, and D. Liebling. Characterizing Microblogs with Topic Models. In ICWSM, 2010.

[40]

J. Reichardt and S. Bornholdt. Statistical Mechanics of Community Detection. Phys. Rev. E, 74(1), 2006.

[41]

H. Rheingold. The virtual community: Finding commection in a computerized world. Addison-Wesley Longman, 1993.

Digital Library

[42]

A. Ritter, C. Cherry, and B. Dolan. Unsupervised Modeling of Twitter Conversations. In HLT, 2010.

Digital Library

[43]

B. State, B. Abrahao, and K. Cook. From Power to Status in Online Exchange. In WebSci, 2012.

[44]

S. Tchokni, D. Ó Séaghdha, and D. Quercia. Emoticons and Phrases: Status Symbols in Social Media. In ICWSM, 2014.

[45]

B. Viswanath, A. Mislove, M. Cha, and K. P. Gummadi. On the Evolution of User Interaction in Facebook. In WOSN, 2009.

Digital Library

[46]

S. Wasserman and K. Faust. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, 1994.

[47]

B. Wellman and S. Wortley. Different Strokes from Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support. American Journal of Sociology, 96(3), 1990.

[48]

C. Wilson, B. Boe, A. Sala, K. P. Puttaswamy, and B. Y. Zhao. User Interactions in Social Networks and their Implications. In EuroSys, 2009.

Digital Library

[49]

R. Xiang, J. Neville, and M. Rogati. Modeling Relationship Strength in Online Social Networks. In WWW, 2010.

Digital Library

[50]

W. Xu, X. Liu, and Y. Gong. Document Clustering Based on Non-negative Matrix Factorization. In SIGIR, 2003.

Digital Library

Cited By

Choi MAiello LVarga KQuercia D(2020)Ten Social Dimensions of Conversations and RelationshipsProceedings of The Web Conference 202010.1145/3366423.3380224(1514-1525)Online publication date: 20-Apr-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3366423.3380224
Schafer S(2019)Healing Cultural Personae With the Media DreamEmerging Trends and Innovations in Privacy and Health Information Management10.4018/978-1-5225-8470-4.ch009(212-262)Online publication date: 2019
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8470-4.ch009
Deri SRappaz JAiello LQuercia D(2018)Coloring in the LinksProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/32743122:CSCW(1-18)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3274312
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Reading the source code of social ties
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)

Recommendations

Will Triadic Closure Strengthen Ties in Social Networks?

The social triad—a group of three people—is one of the simplest and most fundamental social groups. Extensive network and social theories have been developed to understand its structure, such as triadic closure and social balance. Over the course of a ...
Social exchange in online social networks. The reciprocity phenomenon on Facebook

Our research is focused on reciprocity, which is crucial for social exchanges.The online social network platform of our choice was Facebook, which is one of the most successful online social sites.In our study we found strong empirical evidence that an ...
Effects of support and job demands on social media use and work outcomes

We investigated some organizational factors that determine social media use at work.We investigated if social media use at work affects job-related outcomes.Coworker support and job demands positively associate with social media use at work.Supervisor ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

WebSci '14: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM conference on Web science

June 2014

318 pages

ISBN:9781450326223

DOI:10.1145/2615569

General Chairs:
Filippo Menczer
Indiana University, USA
,
Jim Hendler
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, USA
,
William Dutton
University of Oxford, UK
,
Program Chairs:
Markus Strohmaier
GESIS & University of Koblenz-Landau, Germany
,
Eric T. Meyer
University of Oxford, UK
,
Ciro Cattuto
ISI Foundation, Italy

Copyright © 2014 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 23 June 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación

Conference

WebSci '14

Sponsor:

SIGWEB

WebSci '14: ACM Web Science Conference

June 23 - 26, 2014

Indiana, Bloomington, USA

Acceptance Rates

WebSci '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 29 of 144 submissions, 20%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 245 of 933 submissions, 26%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

13
Total Citations
View Citations
269
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)5
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 03 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Choi MAiello LVarga KQuercia D(2020)Ten Social Dimensions of Conversations and RelationshipsProceedings of The Web Conference 202010.1145/3366423.3380224(1514-1525)Online publication date: 20-Apr-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3366423.3380224
Schafer S(2019)Healing Cultural Personae With the Media DreamEmerging Trends and Innovations in Privacy and Health Information Management10.4018/978-1-5225-8470-4.ch009(212-262)Online publication date: 2019
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8470-4.ch009
Deri SRappaz JAiello LQuercia D(2018)Coloring in the LinksProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/32743122:CSCW(1-18)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3274312
Aiello L(2018)Nature of Social StructuresEncyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_110180(1435-1450)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2018
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_110180
Batista NBrandão MAlves Gda Silva AMoro MSheth ANgonga AWang yChang EŚlęzak DFranczyk BAlt RTao X(2017)Collaboration strength metrics and analyses on GitHubProceedings of the International Conference on Web Intelligence10.1145/3106426.3106480(170-178)Online publication date: 23-Aug-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3106426.3106480
Aiello L(2017)The Nature of Social StructuresEncyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining10.1007/978-1-4614-7163-9_110180-1(1-16)Online publication date: 4-Jul-2017
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7163-9_110180-1
Imamori DTajima KMukhopadhyay SZhai CBertino ECrestani FMostafa JTang JSi LZhou XChang YLi YSondhi P(2016)Predicting Popularity of Twitter Accounts through the Discovery of Link-Propagating Early AdoptersProceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/2983323.2983859(639-648)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2983323.2983859
Yang ZJones IHu XLiu H(2015)Finding the Right Social Media Site for QuestionsProceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining 201510.1145/2808797.2809391(639-644)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2808797.2809391
Tarte SWillcox PGlaser HDe Roure DDe Roure DBurnap PHalford S(2015)Archetypal Narratives in Social MachinesProceedings of the ACM Web Science Conference10.1145/2786451.2786471(1-10)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2786451.2786471
Kooti FAiello LGrbovic MLerman KMantrach AGangemi ALeonardi SPanconesi A(2015)Evolution of Conversations in the Age of Email OverloadProceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web10.1145/2736277.2741130(603-613)Online publication date: 18-May-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2736277.2741130
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten