Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2628257.2628261acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessapConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A comparison of two cost-differentiated virtual reality systems for perception and action tasks

Published: 08 August 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Recent advances in technology and the opportunity to obtain commodity-level components have made the development and use of three-dimensional virtual environments more available than ever before. How well such components work to generate realistic virtual environments, particularly environments suitable for perception and action studies, is an open question. In this paper we compare two virtual reality systems in a variety of tasks: distance estimation, virtual object interaction, a complex search task, and a simple viewing experiment. The virtual reality systems center around two different head-mounted displays, a low-cost Oculus Rift and a high-cost Nvis SX60, which differ in resolution, field-of-view, and inertial properties, among other factors. We measure outcomes of the individual tasks as well as assessing simulator sickness and presence. We find that the low-cost system consistently outperforms the high-cost system, but there is some qualitative evidence that some people are more subject to simulator sickness in the low-cost system.

References

[1]
Bakker, N. H., Werkhoven, P. J., and Passenier, P. O. 1999. The effects of proprioceptive and visual feedback on geographical orientation in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 8, 1, 36--53.
[2]
Banks, M. S., Read, J. C., Allison, R. S., and Watt, S. J. 2012. Stereoscopy and the human visual system. SMPTE motion imaging journal 121, 4, 24--43.
[3]
Bodenheimer, B., Ming, J., Wu, H., Narasimham, G., Rump, B., McNamara, T. P., Carr, T. H., and Rieser, J. J. 2007. Distance estimation in virtual and real environments using bisection. In Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, 35--40.
[4]
Byagowi, A., Lambeta, M., Aldaba, C., Moussavi, Z., et al. 2014. Design of a naturalistic navigational virtual reality using oculus rift. Journal of Medical Devices.
[5]
Chance, S. S., Gaunet, F., Beall, A. C., and Loomis, J. M. 1998. Locomotion mode affects updating of objects encountered during travel: The contribution of vestibular and proprioceptive inputs to path integration. Presence 7, 2, 168--178.
[6]
Creem-Regehr, S. H., Gooch, A. A., Sahm, C. S., and Thompson, W. B. 2004. Perceiving virtual geographical slant: Action influences perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 30, 5, 811--821.
[7]
Cutting, J. E., and Vishton, P. M. 1995. Perception of Space and Motion, vol. 5 of Handbook of perception and cognition. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, ch. Percieving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relativie potency, and contexual use of different information and depth, 69--117.
[8]
Frankenstein, J., Mohler, B. J., Bülthoff, H. H., and Meilinger, T. 2012. Is the map in our head oriented north? Psychological science 23, 2, 120--125.
[9]
Geuss, M., Stefanucci, J., Creem-Regehr, S., and Thompson, W. B. 2010. Can i pass?: Using affordances to measure perceived size in virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, ACM, New York, NY, USA, APGV '10, 61--64.
[10]
Grechkin, T. Y., Nguyen, T. D., Plumert, J. M., Cremer, J. F., and Kearney, J. K. 2010. How does presentation method and measurement protocol affect distance estimation in real and virtual environments? ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 7 (July), 26:1--26:18.
[11]
Grechkin, T. Y., Chihak, B. J., Cremer, J. F., Kearney, J. K., and Plumert, J. M. 2013. Perceiving and acting on complex affordances: How children and adults bicycle across two lanes of opposing traffic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 39, 1, 23--36.
[12]
Interrante, V., Ries, B., Lindquist, J., and Anderson, L. 2007. Elucidating the factors that can facilitate veridical spatial perception in immersive virtual environments. In Proc. IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces, 11--18.
[13]
Jones, J. A., Swan, II, J. E., Singh, G., Kolstad, E., and Ellis, S. R. 2008. The effects of virtual reality, augmented reality, and motion parallax on egocentric depth perception. In Proceedings of the 5th symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization, ACM, New York, NY, USA, APGV '08, 9--14.
[14]
Kelly, J. W., McNamara, T. P., Bodenheimer, B., Carr, T. H., and Rieser, J. J. 2008. The shape of human navigation: How environmental geometry is used in maintenance of spatial orientation. Cognition 109, 2, 281--286.
[15]
Kelly, J. W., McNamara, T. P., Bodenheimer, B., Carr, T. H., and Rieser, J. J. 2009. Individual differences in using geometric and featural cues to maintain spatial orientation: Cue quantity and cue ambiguity are more important than cue type. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 16, 1 (Feb.), 176--181.
[16]
Kelly, J. W., Donaldson, L. S., Sjolund, L. A., and Freiberg, J. B. 2013. More than just perceptionaction recalibration: Walking through a virtual environment causes rescaling of perceived space. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 75, 7, 1473--1485.
[17]
Kennedy, R. S., Lane, N. E., Berbaum, K. S., and Lilienthal, M. G. 1993. Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. The international journal of aviation psychology 3, 3, 203--220.
[18]
Kennedy, R. S., Stanney, K. M., and Dunlap, W. P. 2000. Duration and exposure to virtual environments: Sickness curves during and across sessions. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 9, 5, 463--472.
[19]
Klatzky, R. L., Loomis, J. M., Beall, A. C., Chance, S. S., and Golledge, R. G. 1998. Spatial updating of self-position and orientation during real, imagined, and virtual locomotion. Psychological Science 9, 4 (July), 293--298.
[20]
Knapp, J. M., and Loomis, J. M. 2004. Limited field of view of head-mounted displays is not the cause of distance underestimation in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 13, 572--577.
[21]
Kunz, B. R., Wouters, L., Smith, D., Thompson, W. B., and Creem-Regehr, S. H. 2009. Revisiting the effect of quality of graphics on distance judgments in virtual environments: A comparison of verbal reports and blind walking. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 71, 6, 1284--1293.
[22]
Lambooij, M., Fortuin, M., Heynderickx, I., and IJsselsteijn, W. 2009. Visual discomfort and visual fatigue of stereoscopic displays: a review. Journal of Imaging Science and Technology 53, 3, 30201--1.
[23]
Lin, Q., Xie, X., Erdemir, A., Narasimham, G., McNamara, T., Rieser, J., and Bodenheimer, B. 2011. Egocentric distance perception in real and hmd-based virtual environments: The effect of limited scanning method. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization.
[24]
Lin, Q., Rieser, J. J., and Bodenheimer, B. 2013. Stepping off a ledge in an hmd-based immersive virtual environment. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception, ACM, New York, NY, USA, SAP '13, 107--110.
[25]
Loomis, J. M., Da Silva, J. A., Philbeck, J. W., and Fukusima, S. S. 1996. Visual perception of location and distance. Current Directions in Psychological Science 5, 3, 72--77.
[26]
Meehan, M. 2001. Physiological Reaction as an Objective Measure of Presence in Virtual Environments. PhD thesis, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill.
[27]
Meilinger, T., Riecke, B. E., and Bülthoff, H. H. 2013. Local and global reference frames for environmental spaces. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, ahead-of-print, 1--28.
[28]
Messing, R., and Durgin, F. H. 2005. Distance perception and the visual horizon in head-mounted displays. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 2 (July), 234--250.
[29]
Mohler, B. J., Creem-Regehr, S. H., Thompson, W. B., and Blthoff, H. H. 2010. The effect of viewing a self-avatar on distance judgments in an HMD-based virtual environment. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 19, 3, 230--242.
[30]
Nilsson, N. C., Serafin, S., and Nordahl, R. 2014. Establishing the range of perceptually natural visual walking speeds for virtual walking-in-place locomotion. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on 20, 4, 569--578.
[31]
Oculus VR, 2014. Announcing the oculus rift development kit 2 (dk2). http://www.oculusvr.com/blog/announcing-the-oculus-rift-development-kit-2-dk2/, Mar.
[32]
Reiners, T., Teräs, H., Chang, V., Wood, L., Gregory, S., Gibson, D., Petter, N., and Teräs, M. 2014. Authentic, immersive, and emotional experience in virtual learning environments: the fear of dying as an important learning experience in a simulation. In Teaching and Learning Forum 2014, The University of Western Australia.
[33]
Riecke, B. E., Bodenheimer, B., McNamara, T. P., Williams, B., Peng, P., and Feuereissen, D. 2010. Do we need to walk for effective virtual reality navigation? physical rotations alone may suffice. In Spatial Cognition, 234--247.
[34]
Ries, B., Interrante, V., Kaeding, M., and Anderson, L. 2008. The effect of self-embodiment on distance perception in immersive virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology, ACM, New York, NY, USA, VRST '08, 167--170.
[35]
Ries, B., Interrante, V., Kaeding, M., and Phillips, L. 2009. Analyzing the effect of a virtual avatar's geometric and motion fidelity on ego-centric spatial perception in immersive virtual environments. In Proc. ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST), 59--66.
[36]
Rieser, J. J., Ashmead, D. H., Talor, C. R., Youngquist, G. A., et al. 1990. Visual perception and the guidance of locomotion without vision to previously seen targets. Perception 19, 5, 675--689.
[37]
Ruddle, R. A., and Lessels, S. 2006. For efficient navigation search, humans require full physical movement but not a rich visual scene. Psychological Science, 6, 460--465.
[38]
Ruddle, R. A., and Lessels, S. 2009. The benefits of using a walking interface to navigate virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 16, 1, 1--18.
[39]
Ruddle, R. A., and Péruch, P. 2004. Effects of proprioceptive feedback and environmental characteristics on spatial learning in virtual environments. International Jounral of Human-Computer Studies 60, 299--326.
[40]
Saunders, J. A. 2014. Reliability and relative weighting of visual and nonvisual information for perceiving direction of self-motion during walking. Journal of Vision 14, 3.
[41]
Slater, M., and Steed, A. 2000. A virtual presence counter. Presence: Teleoperators and virtual environments 9, 5, 413--434.
[42]
Thompson, W. B., Willemsen, P., Gooch, A. A., Creem-Regehr, S. H., Loomis, J. M., and Beall, A. C. 2004. Does the quality of the computer graphics matter when judging distances in visually immersive environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 13, 560--571.
[43]
Willemsen, P., Gooch, A. A., Thompson, W. B., and Creem-Regehr, S. H. 2008. Effects of stereo viewing conditions on distance perception in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 17, 1, 91--101.
[44]
Willemsen, P., Colton, M. B., Creem-Regehr, S. H., and Thompson, W. B. 2009. The effects of head-mounted display mechanical properties and field-of-view on distance judgments in virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 6, 2, 8:1--8:14.
[45]
Witmer, B. G., and Sadowski, W. J. J. 1998. Nonvisually guided locomotion to a previously viewed target in real and virutal environments. Human Factors 40, 478--488.
[46]
Wu, B., Ooi, T. L., and He, Z. J. 2004. Perceiving distance accurately by a directional process of integrating ground information. Nature 428, 73--77.
[47]
Xie, X., Lin, Q., Wu, H., Narasimham, G., McNamara, T. P., Rieser, J., and Bodenheimer, B. 2010. A system for exploring large virtual environments that combines scaled translational gain and interventions. In Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, ACM, New York, NY, USA, APGV '10, 65--72.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Robo-AdvisorsEntrepreneurship and Creativity in the Metaverse10.4018/979-8-3693-1734-1.ch006(63-76)Online publication date: 8-Mar-2024
  • (2023)Enhancing Design Activity and Review Experience Through Hybridizing Desktop and Virtual EnvironmentsJournal of Interior Design10.1111/joid.1223348:1(47-63)Online publication date: 5-Apr-2023
  • (2023)Enhancing Perception and Immersion in Pre-Captured Environments through Learning-Based Eye Height Adaptation2023 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR)10.1109/ISMAR59233.2023.00055(405-414)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. A comparison of two cost-differentiated virtual reality systems for perception and action tasks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SAP '14: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception
    August 2014
    137 pages
    ISBN:9781450330091
    DOI:10.1145/2628257
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 08 August 2014

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. head-mounted displays
    2. virtual avatar
    3. virtual environments
    4. virtual reality (VR)

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    SAP '14
    Sponsor:
    SAP '14: ACM Symposium on Applied Perception 2014
    August 8 - 9, 2014
    British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 43 of 94 submissions, 46%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)30
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
    Reflects downloads up to 03 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Robo-AdvisorsEntrepreneurship and Creativity in the Metaverse10.4018/979-8-3693-1734-1.ch006(63-76)Online publication date: 8-Mar-2024
    • (2023)Enhancing Design Activity and Review Experience Through Hybridizing Desktop and Virtual EnvironmentsJournal of Interior Design10.1111/joid.1223348:1(47-63)Online publication date: 5-Apr-2023
    • (2023)Enhancing Perception and Immersion in Pre-Captured Environments through Learning-Based Eye Height Adaptation2023 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR)10.1109/ISMAR59233.2023.00055(405-414)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
    • (2022)VR Distance Judgments are Affected by the Amount of Pre-Experiment Blind WalkingACM Symposium on Applied Perception 202210.1145/3548814.3551463(1-5)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2022
    • (2022)Evaluating Perceptional Tasks for Medicine: A Comparative User Study Between a Virtual Reality and a Desktop Application2022 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)10.1109/VR51125.2022.00071(514-523)Online publication date: Mar-2022
    • (2022)Perceiving distance in virtual reality: theoretical insights from contemporary technologiesPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences10.1098/rstb.2021.0456378:1869Online publication date: 13-Dec-2022
    • (2022)Immersive virtual reality in the age of the MetaverseThe Journal of Strategic Information Systems10.1016/j.jsis.2022.10171731:2Online publication date: 1-Jun-2022
    • (2022)Spatial Perception Assessment in Immersive Virtual Environments. A Methodological ApproachArchitectural Graphics10.1007/978-3-031-04703-9_41(408-415)Online publication date: 28-Apr-2022
    • (2021)Effects of Level of Immersion on Virtual Training Transfer of Bimanual Assembly TasksFrontiers in Virtual Reality10.3389/frvir.2021.5974872Online publication date: 20-May-2021
    • (2021)Using Audio Reverberation to Compensate Distance Compression in Virtual RealityACM Symposium on Applied Perception 202110.1145/3474451.3476236(1-10)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2021
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media