Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Multiple-Scent Enhanced Multimedia Synchronization

Published: 01 October 2014 Publication History

Abstract

This study looked at users' perception of interstream synchronization between audiovisual media and two olfactory streams. The ability to detect skews and the perception and impact of skews on user Quality of Experience (QoE) is analyzed. The olfactory streams are presented with the same skews (i.e., delay) and with variable skews (i.e., jitter and mix of scents). This article reports the limits beyond which desynchronization reduces user-perceived quality levels. Also, a minimum gap between the presentations of consecutive scents is identified, necessary to ensuring enhanced user-perceived quality. There is no evidence (not considering scent type) that overlapping or mixing of scents increases user QoE levels for olfaction-enhanced multimedia.

References

[1]
Y. Ariyakul and T. Nakamoto. 2011. Olfactory display using a miniaturized pump and a SAW atomizer for presenting low-volatile scents. In Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Conference. 193--194.
[2]
L. R. Blackwell. 1997. The role of olfactory cues and their effects on food choice and acceptability. Ph.D. Dissertation, Bournemouth University, Poole. http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/407/.
[3]
S. Borromeo, J. A. Hernandez-Tamames, G. Luna, F. Machado, N. Malpica, and A. Toledano. 2010. Objective assessment of olfactory function using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 59, 10, 2602--2608.
[4]
S. Brewster, D. Mcgookin, and C. Miller. 2006. Olfoto: Designing a smell-based interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 653--662.
[5]
J. Cha, M. Eid, A. Barghout, A. S. M. Mahfujur Rahman, and A. El Saddik. 2009. HugMe: Synchronous haptic teleconferencing. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM'09). 1135--1136.
[6]
J.-C. Chebat and R. Michon. 2003. Impact of ambient odors on mall shoppers' emotions, cognition, and spending: A test of competitive causal theories. J. Bus. Res. 56, 7, 529--539.
[7]
G. Dann and J. K. S. Jacobsen. 2003. Tourism smellscapes. Tour. Geograph. 5, 1, 3--25.
[8]
M. H. Depledge, R. J. Stone, and W. J. Bird. 2011. Can natural and virtual environments be used to promote improved human health and wellbeing? Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 11, 4660--4665.
[9]
M. Eid, J. Cha, and A. El Saddik. 2011. Admux: An adaptive multiplexer for haptic-audio-visual-data communication. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 60, 1, 21--31.
[10]
B. Emsenhuber. 2011. The olfactory medium: Smell in human-computer interaction. Sci. Technol. Innov. Stud. 7, 1.
[11]
Exhalia. 2013. www.exhalia.com (Last accessed March 2013.)
[12]
M. Gerardi, B. O. Rothbaum, K. Ressler, M. Heekin, and A. Rizzo. 2008. Virtual reality exposure therapy using a virtual Iraq: Case report. J. Trauma Stress 21, 2, 209--213.
[13]
G. Ghinea and O. A. Ademoye. 2012. The sweet smell of success: Enhancing multimedia applications with olfaction. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 8, 1, Article 2.
[14]
G. Ghinea and O. A. Ademoye. 2010. Perceived synchronization of olfactory multimedia. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. Part A: Systems and Humans 40, 4, 657--663.
[15]
G. Ghinea and O. A. Ademoye. 2011. Olfaction-enhanced multimedia: Perspectives and challenges. Multimedia Tools Appl. 55, 3, 601--626.
[16]
N. Guéguen and C. Petr. 2006. Odors and consumer behavior in a restaurant. Int. J. Hospitality Manag. 25, 2, 335--339.
[17]
A. Haehner, T. Hummel, and H. Reichmann. 2009. Olfactory dysfunction as a diagnostic marker for Parkinson's disease. Expert Rev. Neurother. 9, 12, 1773--1779.
[18]
A. R. Hirsch. 2006. Effects of ambient odors on slot-machine usage in a Las Vegas casino. Psychol. Market. 12, 7, 585--594.
[19]
S. Hoshino, Y. Ishibashi, N. Fukushima, and S. Sugawara. 2011. QoE assessment in olfactory and haptic media transmission: Influence of inter-stream synchronization error. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop Technical Committee on Communications Quality and Reliability. 1--6.
[20]
Z. Huang, A. Arefin, P. Agarwal, K. Nahrstedt, and W. Wu. 2012. Towards the understanding of human perceptual quality in tele-immersive shared activity. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Multimedia Systems Conference (MMSys'12). 29--34.
[21]
ISO. 2010. ISO/IEC FDIS 23005-3 Information Technology -- Media context and control- Part 3: Sensory information. International Standards Organization (ISO).
[22]
ISO. 2007. ISO/IEC 8589 Sensory analysis—General guidance for the design of test rooms. International Standards Organization (ISO).
[23]
ISO. 2008. ISO 5492:2008 Sensory analysis—Vocabulary. International Standards Organization (ISO).
[24]
ISO. 2006. ISO 5496:2006 Sensory analysis—Methodology—Initiation and training of assessors in the detection and recognition of odours. International Standards Organization (ISO).
[25]
ITU. 2002. ITU-T BT.500. Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures. International Telecommunication Union (ITU).
[26]
ITU. 2008. ITU-T P.910. Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications. International Telecommunication Union (ITU).
[27]
J. N. Kaye. 2001. Symbolic olfactory display. M. S. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
[28]
J.-S. Lee, L. Goldmann, and T. Ebrahimi. 2011. A new analysis method for paired comparison and its application to 3D quality assessment. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM'11). 1281--1284.
[29]
B. Longino. 1999. A century in the arts. Atlanta J. Constitut.
[30]
N. Murray, Y. Qiao, B. Lee, A. K. Karunakar, and G.-M. Muntean. 2013a. Subjective evaluation of olfactory and visual media synchronization. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference (MMSys'13). 162--171.
[31]
N. Murray, Y. Qiao, B. Lee, A. K. Karunakar, and G.-M. Muntean. 2013b. Age and gender influence on perceived olfactory and visual media synchronization. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME'13). 1--6.
[32]
N. Murray, Y. Qiao, B. Lee, and G.-M. Muntean. 2014a. Olfaction enhanced multimedia: A survey of application domains, displays and research challenges. ACM Comput. Surv. (To appear)
[33]
N. Murray, Y. Qiao, B. Lee, and G.-M. Muntean. 2014b. User-profile-based perceived olfactory and visual media synchronization. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 10, 1s, Article 11.
[34]
N. Murray. 2013. Questionnaire for special sssue on MulseMedia (TOMCCAP). http://www.niallmurray.info/Research/appendix.
[35]
T. Nakamoto, S. Otaguro, M. Kinoshita, M. Nagahama, K. Ohinishi, and T. Ishida. 2008. Cooking up an interactive olfactory game display. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 28, 1, 75--78.
[36]
T. Nakamoto and H. P. D. Minh. 2007. Improvement of olfactory display using solenoid valves. In Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Conference (VR'07). 179--186.
[37]
T. Nakamoto and K. Yoshikawa. 2006. Movie with scents generated by olfactory display using solenoid valves. IEICE Trans. Fund. Electr. Commun. Comput. Sci. E89-A, 11, 3327--3332.
[38]
T. Narumi, S. Nishizaka, T. Kajinami, T. Tanikawa, and M. Hirose. 2011. Augmented reality flavors: Gustatory display based on edible marker and cross-modal interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'11). 93--102.
[39]
D. Noguchi, S. Sugimoto, Y. Bannai, and K. Okada. 2011. Time characteristics of olfaction in a single breath. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'11). 83--92.
[40]
J. Pair, B. Allen, M. Dautricourt, A. Treskunov, M. Liewer, K. Graap, and G. Reger. 2006. A virtual reality exposure therapy application for Iraq war post traumatic stress disorder. In Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Conference. 67--72.
[41]
L. Shams and A. R. Seitz. 2008. Benefits of multisensory learning. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12, 11, 411--417.
[42]
B. S. Spencer. 2006. Incorporating the sense of smell into patient and haptic surgical simulators. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 10, 1, 168--173.
[43]
R. Steinmetz. 1996. Human perception of jitter and media synchronization. IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun. 14, 1, 61--72.
[44]
S. Sugimoto, D. Noguchi, Y. Bannai, and K. Okada. 2010. Ink jet olfactory display enabling instantaneous switches of scents. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM'10). 301--310.
[45]
J. Tillotson. 2008. Scentsory Design®: Scent whisper and fashion fluidics. In Transdisciplinary Digital Art. Sound, Vision and the New Screen, Communication in Computer and Information Science, Vol. 7, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 403--417.
[46]
C. Timmerer, M. Waltl, B. Rainer, and H. Hellwagner. 2012. Assessing the quality of sensory experience for multimedia presentations. Signal Process. Image Commun. 27, 8, 909--916.
[47]
A. Tomono, S. Yamamoto, M. Utsunomiya, D. Ikei, Y. Yanagida, and K. Hosaka. 2004. Effect that the image media with scent gives to contents understanding. In Proceedings of the Human Interface Symposium. 249--254.
[48]
D. Warnock. 2011. A subjective evaluation of multimodal notifications. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth'11). 461--468.
[49]
D. A. Washburn and L. M. Jones. 2004. Could olfactory displays improve data visualization? Comput. Sci. Eng. 6, 6, 80--83.
[50]
D. A. Washburn. 2003. Olfactory use in virtual environment training. Model. Simul. 2, 3, 19--25.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Encrypted Video Search with Single/Multiple WritersACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications10.1145/3643887Online publication date: 5-Feb-2024
  • (2023)Guidelines for conducting biofeedback-enhanced QoE studies in mulsemedia-enhanced virtual realityProceedings of the 29th Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web10.1145/3617023.3617029(32-40)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2023
  • (2023)An Investigation of Olfactory-Enhanced Video on EEG-Based Emotion RecognitionIEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering10.1109/TNSRE.2023.325386631(1602-1613)Online publication date: 2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Multiple-Scent Enhanced Multimedia Synchronization

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications
    ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications  Volume 11, Issue 1s
    Special Issue on Multiple Sensorial (MulSeMedia) Multimodal Media : Advances and Applications
    September 2014
    260 pages
    ISSN:1551-6857
    EISSN:1551-6865
    DOI:10.1145/2675060
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 October 2014
    Accepted: 01 May 2014
    Revised: 01 March 2014
    Received: 01 November 2013
    Published in TOMM Volume 11, Issue 1s

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Olfaction
    2. multimedia synchronization
    3. quality of experience
    4. subjective quality assessment

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)17
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Encrypted Video Search with Single/Multiple WritersACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications10.1145/3643887Online publication date: 5-Feb-2024
    • (2023)Guidelines for conducting biofeedback-enhanced QoE studies in mulsemedia-enhanced virtual realityProceedings of the 29th Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web10.1145/3617023.3617029(32-40)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2023
    • (2023)An Investigation of Olfactory-Enhanced Video on EEG-Based Emotion RecognitionIEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering10.1109/TNSRE.2023.325386631(1602-1613)Online publication date: 2023
    • (2023)Key Technologies for Networked Virtual EnvironmentsMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-023-15160-z82:27(41471-41537)Online publication date: 3-Apr-2023
    • (2022)A questionnaire-based and physiology-inspired quality of experience evaluation of an immersive multisensory wheelchair simulatorProceedings of the 13th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference10.1145/3524273.3528175(1-11)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2022
    • (2022)Defining Scents: A Systematic Literature Review of Olfactory-based Computing SystemsACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications10.1145/347097518:1(1-22)Online publication date: 27-Jan-2022
    • (2022)Integration of Multisensorial Effects in Synchronised Immersive Hybrid TV ScenariosIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2022.319417010(79071-79089)Online publication date: 2022
    • (2022)Solutions for Improving Rich Media Streaming Quality in Heterogeneous Network EnvironmentsWiley Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering10.1002/047134608X.W8430(1-18)Online publication date: 17-Feb-2022
    • (2020)How Do We Experience Crossmodal Correspondent Mulsemedia Content?IEEE Transactions on Multimedia10.1109/TMM.2019.294127422:5(1249-1258)Online publication date: May-2020
    • (2020)On the Impact of Single and Multiple Effects on Quality of Experience for Multisensorial TV in Smart Home2020 IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting (BMSB)10.1109/BMSB49480.2020.9379734(1-6)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2020
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media