Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2652524.2652555acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesesemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Where do we stand in requirements engineering improvement today?: first results from a mapping study

Published: 18 September 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Context: Requirements engineering process improvement (REPI) approaches have gained much attention in research and practice. Goal: So far, there is no comprehensive view on the research in REPI in terms of solutions and current state of reported evidence. We aims to provide an overview on the existing solutions, their underlying principles and their research type facets, i.e. their state of empirical evidence. Method: To this end, we conducted a systematic mapping study of the REPI publication space. Results: This paper reports on the first findings regarding research type facets of the contributions as well as selected methodological principles. We found a strong focus in the existing research on solution proposals for REPI approaches that concentrate on normative assessments and benchmarks of the RE activities rather than on holistic RE improvements according to individual goals of companies. Conclusions: We conclude, so far, that there is a need to broaden the work and to investigate more problem-driven REPI which also targets the improvement of the quality of the underlying RE artefacts, which currently seem out of scope.

References

[1]
B. Kitchenham, O. Pearl Brereton, D. Budgen, M. Turner, J. Bailey, and S. Linkman. Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - a systematic literature review. IST.
[2]
D. Méndez Fernández, S. Wagner, K. Lochmann, A. Baumann, and H. de Carne. Field Study on Requirements Engineering: Investigation of Artefacts, Project Parameters, and Execution Strategies. IST.
[3]
Méndez Fernández, D. and Wieringa, R. Improving Requirements Engineering by Artefact Orientation. In PROFES'13.
[4]
S. Ognawala, D. Méndez Fernández, and S. Wagner. Requirements Engineering Improvement Today - A Systematic Mapping Study. TUM-I145.
[5]
K. Petersen, R. Feldt, S. Mujtaba, and M. Mattsson. Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering. In EASE'08.
[6]
F. Pettersson, M. Ivarsson, T. Gorschek, and P. Öhman. A Practitioner's Guide to Light Weight Software Process Assessment and Improvement Planning. JSS.
[7]
P. Sawyer, I. Sommerville, and S. Viller. Requirements Process Improvement through the Phased Introduction of Good Practice. SPI and Practice.
[8]
R. Wieringa, N. Maiden, N. Mead, and C. Rolland. Requirements Engineering Paper Classification and Evaluation Criteria: A Proposal and a Discussion. In RE'06.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Reproducible Searches in Systematic Reviews: An Evaluation and GuidelinesIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.329921111(84048-84060)Online publication date: 2023
  • (2018)On the pragmatic design of literature studies in software engineeringEmpirical Software Engineering10.1007/s10664-016-9492-y22:6(2852-2891)Online publication date: 26-Dec-2018
  • (2016)Quality Assurance of Requirements Artifacts in Practice: A Case Study and a Process ProposalProduct-Focused Software Process Improvement10.1007/978-3-319-49094-6_36(506-516)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2016
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Where do we stand in requirements engineering improvement today?: first results from a mapping study

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ESEM '14: Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement
    September 2014
    461 pages
    ISBN:9781450327749
    DOI:10.1145/2652524
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 18 September 2014

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. requirements engineering
    2. software process improvement
    3. systematic mapping study

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    ESEM '14
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    ESEM '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 23 of 123 submissions, 19%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 130 of 594 submissions, 22%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 10 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Reproducible Searches in Systematic Reviews: An Evaluation and GuidelinesIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.329921111(84048-84060)Online publication date: 2023
    • (2018)On the pragmatic design of literature studies in software engineeringEmpirical Software Engineering10.1007/s10664-016-9492-y22:6(2852-2891)Online publication date: 26-Dec-2018
    • (2016)Quality Assurance of Requirements Artifacts in Practice: A Case Study and a Process ProposalProduct-Focused Software Process Improvement10.1007/978-3-319-49094-6_36(506-516)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2016
    • (2015)A Case Study on Artefact-Based RE Improvement in PracticeProceedings of the 16th International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement - Volume 945910.1007/978-3-319-26844-6_9(114-130)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2015
    • (2014)Artefact-Based Requirements Engineering Improvement: Learning to Walk in PracticeProduct-Focused Software Process Improvement10.1007/978-3-319-13835-0_27(302-305)Online publication date: 2014

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media