Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2661829.2662046acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Practical Fine-grained Approach to Resolving Incoherent OWL 2 DL Terminologies

Published: 03 November 2014 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Resolving incoherent terminologies is an important task in the maintenance of evolving OWL 2 DL ontologies. Existing approaches to this task are either semi-automatic or based on simple deletion of axioms. There is a need of fine-grained approaches to automatize this task. Since a fine-grained approach should consider multiple choices for modifying an axiom other than the deletion of axioms only, the primary challenges for developing such an approach lie in both the semantics of the repaired results and the efficiency in computing the repaired results. To tackle these challenges, we first introduce the notion of fine-grained repair based on modifying one axiom to zero or more axioms, then propose an efficient incremental method for computing all fine-grained repairs one by one. We also propose a modification function for axioms expressed in OWL 2 DL, which returns weaker axioms. Based on this modification function and the method for computing fine-grained repairs, we develop an automatic approach to resolving incoherent OWL 2 DL terminologies. Our extensive experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach is efficient and practical.

    References

    [1]
    S. Bail, B. Parsia, and U. Sattler. The logical diversity of explanations in OWL ontologies. In Proc. of CIKM'13, pages 559--568, 2013.
    [2]
    P. Cimiano and J. Völker. Text2onto - a framework for ontology learning and data-driven change discovery. In Proc. of NLDB'05, pages 227--238, 2005.
    [3]
    J. Du, G. Qi, J. Z. Pan, and Y. Shen. A decomposition-based approach to OWL DL ontology diagnosis. In Proc. of ICTAI'11, pages 659--664, 2011.
    [4]
    B. Cuenca Grau, I. Horrocks, Y. Kazakov, and U. Sattler. Modular reuse of ontologies: Theory and practice. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 31:273--318, 2008.
    [5]
    M. Horridge, B. Parsia, and U. Sattler. Laconic and precise justifications in OWL. In Proc. of ISWC'08, pages 323--338, 2008.
    [6]
    I. Horrocks, O. Kutz, and U. Sattler. The even more irresistible SROIQ. In Proc. of KR'06, pages 57--67, 2006.
    [7]
    U. Junker. QUICKXPLAIN: Preferred explanations and relaxations for over-constrained problems. In Proc. of AAAI'04, pages 167--172, 2004.
    [8]
    A. Kalyanpur. Debugging and Repair of OWL Ontologies. PhD thesis, The Graduate School of the University of Maryland, 2006.
    [9]
    A. Kalyanpur, B. Parsia, M. Horridge, and E. Sirin. Finding all justifications of OWL DL entailments. In Proc. of ISWC'07, pages 267--280, 2007.
    [10]
    A. Kalyanpur, B. Parsia, E. Sirin, and B. Cuenca Grau. Repairing unsatisfiable concepts in OWL ontologies. In Proc. of ESWC'06, pages 170--184, 2006.
    [11]
    A. Kalyanpur, B. Parsia, E. Sirin, B. Cuenca Grau, and J. Hendler. Swoop: A web ontology editing browser. Journal of Web Semantics, 4(2):144--153, 2006.
    [12]
    A. Kalyanpur, B. Parsia, E. Sirin, and J. Hendler. Debugging unsatisfiable classes in OWL ontologies. Journal of Web Semantics, 3(4):268--293, 2005.
    [13]
    S. C. Lam, J. Z. Pan, D. H. Sleeman, and W. W. Vasconcelos. A fine-grained approach to resolving unsatisfiable ontologies. In Proc. of WI'06, pages 428--434, 2006.
    [14]
    J. Lehmann and P. Hitzler. Concept learning in description logics using refinement operators. Machine Learning, 78(1--2):203--250, 2010.
    [15]
    T. Meyer, K. Lee, R. Booth, and J. Z. Pan. Finding maximally satisfiable terminologies for the description logic ALC. In Proc. of AAAI'06, pages 269--274, 2006.
    [16]
    B. Parsia, E. Sirin, and A. Kalyanpur. Debugging OWL ontologies. In Proc. of WWW'05, pages 633--640, 2005.
    [17]
    R. Reiter. A theory of diagnosis from first principles. Artificial Intelligence, 32(1):57--95, 1987.
    [18]
    K. Satoh and T. Uno. Enumerating minimally revised specifications using dualization. In JSAI Workshops, pages 182--189, 2005.
    [19]
    S. Schlobach. Diagnosing terminologies. In Proc. of AAAI'05, pages 670--675, 2005.
    [20]
    S. Schlobach and R. Cornet. Non-standard reasoning services for the debugging of description logic terminologies. In IJCAI'03, pages 355--362, 2003.
    [21]
    S. Schlobach, Z. Huang, R. Cornet, and F. van Harmelen. Debugging incoherent terminologies. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 39(3):317--349, 2007.
    [22]
    K. M. Shchekotykhin and G. Friedrich. Query strategy for sequential ontology debugging. In Proc. of ISWC'10, pages 696--712, 2010.
    [23]
    E. Sirin, B. Parsia, B. Cuenca Grau, A. Kalyanpur, and Y. Katz. Pellet: A practical OWL-DL reasoner. Journal of Web Semantics, 5(2):51--53, 2007.
    [24]
    B. Suntisrivaraporn, G. Qi, Q. Ji, and P. Haase. A modularization-based approach to finding all justifications for OWL DL entailments. In Proc. of ASWC'08, pages 1--15, 2008.
    [25]
    J. Völker, D. Vrandecic, Y. Sure, and A. Hotho. Learning disjointness. In Proc. of ESWC'07, pages 175--189, 2007.
    [26]
    Z. Zhou, G. Qi, and B. Suntisrivaraporn. A new method of finding all justifications in OWL 2 EL. In Proc. of WI'13, pages 213--220, 2013.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Relating Optimal Repairs in Ontology Engineering with Contraction Operations in Belief ChangeACM SIGAPP Applied Computing Review10.1145/3626307.362630823:3(5-18)Online publication date: 29-Sep-2023
    • (2023)Completing and Debugging Ontologies: State-of-the-art and Challenges in Repairing OntologiesJournal of Data and Information Quality10.1145/359730415:4(1-38)Online publication date: 15-May-2023
    • (2023)Optimal Repairs in Ontology Engineering as Pseudo-Contractions in Belief ChangeProceedings of the 38th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing10.1145/3555776.3577719(983-990)Online publication date: 27-Mar-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CIKM '14: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
    November 2014
    2152 pages
    ISBN:9781450325981
    DOI:10.1145/2661829
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 03 November 2014

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. description logics
    2. fine-grained
    3. incoherence
    4. owl
    5. repair

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    CIKM '14
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    CIKM '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 175 of 838 submissions, 21%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,861 of 8,427 submissions, 22%

    Upcoming Conference

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 26 Jul 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Relating Optimal Repairs in Ontology Engineering with Contraction Operations in Belief ChangeACM SIGAPP Applied Computing Review10.1145/3626307.362630823:3(5-18)Online publication date: 29-Sep-2023
    • (2023)Completing and Debugging Ontologies: State-of-the-art and Challenges in Repairing OntologiesJournal of Data and Information Quality10.1145/359730415:4(1-38)Online publication date: 15-May-2023
    • (2023)Optimal Repairs in Ontology Engineering as Pseudo-Contractions in Belief ChangeProceedings of the 38th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing10.1145/3555776.3577719(983-990)Online publication date: 27-Mar-2023
    • (2023)A graph-based method for interactive mapping revision in DL-LiteExpert Systems with Applications: An International Journal10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118598211:COnline publication date: 1-Jan-2023
    • (2023)Optimal Repairs in the Description Logic $$\mathcal{E}\mathcal{L}$$ RevisitedLogics in Artificial Intelligence10.1007/978-3-031-43619-2_2(11-34)Online publication date: 24-Sep-2023
    • (2023)Repairing $$\mathcal{{EL}}$$ Ontologies Using Weakening and CompletingThe Semantic Web10.1007/978-3-031-33455-9_18(298-315)Online publication date: 22-May-2023
    • (2022)Effective method for detecting error causes from incoherent biological ontologiesMathematical Biosciences and Engineering10.3934/mbe.202234919:7(7388-7409)Online publication date: 2022
    • (2022)An Embedding-Based Approach to Repairing OWL OntologiesApplied Sciences10.3390/app12241265512:24(12655)Online publication date: 9-Dec-2022
    • (2022)Almost Certain Termination for $$\mathcal {ALC}$$ WeakeningProgress in Artificial Intelligence10.1007/978-3-031-16474-3_54(663-675)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2022
    • (2021)Debugging incoherent ontology by extracting a clash module and identifying root unsatisfiable conceptsKnowledge-Based Systems10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107043223(107043)Online publication date: Jul-2021
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media