Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2680821.2680828acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesconextConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Model Based Black-Box Testing of SDN Applications

Published: 02 December 2014 Publication History

Abstract

The quality of control plane applications determines reliability of the Software-Defined Networking (SDN). The risk of bugs and challenges for testing actually have been increased due to the programmability of SDN. In this paper, we propose a model based black-box testing method for SDN applications. We use a group of components to describe the data structure stored in the applications and the system behaviors. Based on our models, we present our test generation approach and work-in-progress test tool. With partial model composition, it can systematically generate data plane test sequences and alleviate state explosion.

References

[1]
T. Ball, N. Bjørner, A. Gember, S. Itzhaky, A. Karbyshev, M. Sagiv, M. Schapira, and A. Valadarsky. Vericon: Towards verifying controller programs in software-defined networks. In Proceedings of the 35th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, PLDI'14, pages 282--293. ACM, 2014.
[2]
M. Canini, D. Venzano, P. Perešíni, D. Kostic, and J. Rexford. A nice way to test openflow applications. In Presented as part of the 9th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI'12), pages 127--140, San Jose, CA, 2012. USENIX.
[3]
P. Kazemian, G. Varghese, and N. McKeown. Header space analysis: Static checking for networks. In Presented as part of the 9th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI'12), pages 113--126, San Jose, CA, USA, 2012. USENIX.
[4]
T. Nelson, A. D. Ferguson, M. J. Scheer, and S. Krishnamurthi. Tierless programming and reasoning for software-defined networks. In 11th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI'14), pages 519--531, Seattle, WA, 2014. USENIX.
[5]
NOX. Pyswitch application. https://github.com/noxrepo/nox-classic/blob/destiny/src/nox/coreapps/examples/pyswitch.py.
[6]
ONF. White paper (software-defined networking: The new norm for networks). https://www.opennetworking.org/sdn-resources/sdn-library/whitepapers.
[7]
C. Scott, A. Wundsam, B. Raghavan, A. Panda, A. Or, J. Lai, E. Huang, Z. Liu, A. El-Hassany, S. Whitlock, H. Acharya, K. Zarifis, and S. Shenker. Troubleshooting blackbox sdn control software with minimal causal sequences. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM Conference on SIGCOMM, pages 395--406. ACM, 2014.

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Fault Management in Software-Defined Networking: A SurveyIEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials10.1109/COMST.2018.286892221:1(349-392)Online publication date: Sep-2020
  • (2019)A Survey on Network Verification and Testing With Formal Methods: Approaches and ChallengesIEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials10.1109/COMST.2018.286805021:1(940-969)Online publication date: Sep-2020

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CoNEXT Student Workshop '14: Proceedings of the 2014 CoNEXT on Student Workshop
December 2014
58 pages
ISBN:9781450332828
DOI:10.1145/2680821
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 December 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. model-based testing (mbt)
  2. sdn application testing
  3. software-defined networking (sdn)
  4. test generation

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

CoNEXT '14
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

CoNEXT Student Workshop '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 17 of 34 submissions, 50%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 198 of 789 submissions, 25%

Upcoming Conference

CoNEXT '24

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 01 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Fault Management in Software-Defined Networking: A SurveyIEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials10.1109/COMST.2018.286892221:1(349-392)Online publication date: Sep-2020
  • (2019)A Survey on Network Verification and Testing With Formal Methods: Approaches and ChallengesIEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials10.1109/COMST.2018.286805021:1(940-969)Online publication date: Sep-2020

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media