Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2696454.2696487acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Robot Presence and Human Honesty: Experimental Evidence

Published: 02 March 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Robots are predicted to serve in environments in which human honesty is important, such as the workplace, schools, and public institutions. Can the presence of a robot facilitate honest behavior? In this paper, we describe an experimental study evaluating the effects of robot social presence on people's honesty. Participants completed a perceptual task, which is structured so as to allow them to earn more money by not complying with the experiment instructions. We compare three conditions between subjects: Completing the task alone in a room; completing it with a non-monitoring human present; and completing it with a non-monitoring robot present. The robot is a new expressive social head capable of 4-DoF head movement and screen-based eye animation, specifically designed and built for this research. It was designed to convey social presence, but not monitoring. We find that people cheat in all three conditions, but cheat equally less when there is a human or a robot in the room, compared to when they are alone. We did not find differences in the perceived authority of the human and the robot, but did find that people felt significantly less guilty after cheating in the presence of a robot as compared to a human. This has implications for the use of robots in monitoring and supervising tasks in environments in which honesty is key.

References

[1]
Aroca, R. V, Péricles, A., de Oliveira, B.S., Marcos, L. and Gonçalves, G. 2012. Towards smarter robots with smartphones. 5th Workshop in Applied Robotics and Automation, Robocontrol.
[2]
Bainbridge, W., Hart, J., Kim, E. and Scassellati, B. 2008. The effect of presence on human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN 2008).
[3]
Bandiera, O., Barankay, I. and Rasul, I. 2009. Social connections and incentives in the workplace: Evidence from personnel data. Econometrica. 77, 4, 1047--1094.
[4]
Bartneck, C., Verbunt, M., Mubin, O. and Al Mahmud, A. 2007. To kill a mockingbird robot. Proceeding of the ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction - HRI '07 81.
[5]
Bateson, M., Nettle, D. and Roberts, G. 2006. Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology letters. 2, 3, 412--4.
[6]
Bauer, A., Wollherr, D. and Buss, M. 2008. Human-robot collaboration: a survey. International Journal of Humanoid Robots.
[7]
Bazerman, M.H. and Tenbrunsel, A.E. 2011. Blind spots: Why we fail to do what's right and what to do about it. Princeton University Press.
[8]
Bhattacharjee, S., Gopal, R. and Sanders, G. 2003. Digital music and online sharing: software piracy 2.0? Communications of the ACM. 46, 107--111.
[9]
BossaNova Robotics: http://www.bnrobotics.com/. Accessed: 2014--10-03.
[10]
Burke, J., Coovert, M., Murphy, R., Riley, J. and Rogers, E. 2006. Human-Robot Factors: Robots in the Workplace. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 870--874.
[11]
Canner, E. 2008. Sex, Lies and Pharmaceuticals: The Making of an Investigative Documentary about 'Female Sexual Dysfunction'. Feminism & Psychology.
[12]
Cialdini, R.B., Reno, R.R. and Kallgren, C.A. 1990. A focus theory of normative conduct: recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of personality and social psychology. 58, 6, 1015.
[13]
Covey, M.K., Saladin, S. and Killen, P.J. 1989. SelfMonitoring, Surveillance, and Incentive Effects on Cheating. The Journal of Social Psychology. 129, 5, 673--679.
[14]
Crocker, K.J. and Morgan, J. 1998. Is Honesty the Best Policy? Curtailing Insurance Fraud Through Optimal Incentive Contracts. J of Political Economy. 106, 355.
[15]
DePaulo, B.M. and Kashy, D.A. Everyday lies in close and casual relationships.
[16]
Diener, E., Fraser, S.C., Beaman, A.L. and Kelem, R.T. 1976. Effects of deindividuation variables on stealing among Halloween trick-or-treaters. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 33, 2, 178.
[17]
DiSalvo, C.F., Gemperle, F., Forlizzi, J. and Kiesler, S. 2002. All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads. Proc of the 4th conference on designing interactive systems (DIS2002) 321--326.
[18]
Gino, F., Ayal, S. and Ariely, D. 2009. Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior: the effect of one bad apple on the barrel. Psychological science. 20, 3, 393--8.
[19]
Gino, F., Norton, M.I. and Ariely, D. 2010. The counterfeit self: the deceptive costs of faking it. Psychological science. 21, 5, 712--20.
[20]
Groom, V., Chen, J., Johnson, T., Kara, F.A. and Nass, C. 2010. Critic, compatriot, or chump?: Responses to robot blame attribution. 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI'10).
[21]
Hamblin, R.L., Hathaway, C. and Wodarski, J.S. 1971. Group contingencies, peer tutoring, and accelerating academic achievement. A new direction for education: Behavior analysis. 1, 41--53.
[22]
Hoffman, G. 2012. Dumb Robots, Smart Phones?: a Case Study of Music Listening Companionship. RO-MAN 2012 - The IEEE Int'l Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication 358--363.
[23]
Hoffman, G. and Ju, W. 2014. Designing Robots With Movement in Mind. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction. 3, 1, 89.
[24]
Ju, W. and Takayama, L. 2011. Should robots or people do these jobs? A survey of robotics experts and nonexperts about which jobs robots should do. 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2452--2459.
[25]
Kanda, T., Hirano, T., Eaton, D. and Ishiguro, H. 2004. Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: A field trial. Human-Computer Interaction. 19, 61--84.
[26]
Kaniarasu, P. and Steinfeld, A. 2014. Effects of blame on trust in human robot interaction. IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN'14).
[27]
Lee, K.M., Peng, W., Jin, S.-A. and Yan, C. 2006. Can Robots Manifest Personality?: An Empirical Test of Personality Recognition, Social Responses, and Social Presence in Human-Robot Interaction. Journal of Communication. 56, 4, 754--772.
[28]
Mas, A. and Moretti, E. 2006. Peers at work.
[29]
Mazar, N., Amir, O. and Ariely, D. 2008. The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of marketing research. 45, 6, 633--644.
[30]
Murphy, K.R. 1993. Honesty in the workplace. Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
[31]
Mutlu, B., Forlizzi, J. and Hodgins, J. 2006. A storytelling robot: Modeling and evaluation of humanlike gaze behavior. Humanoid Robots, 2006 6th IEEERAS International Conference on 518--523.
[32]
Nagin, D., Rebitzer, J., Sanders, S. and Taylor, L. 2002. Monitoring, Motivation and Management: The Determinants of Opportunistic Behavior in a Field Experiment.
[33]
Reno, R.R., Cialdini, R.B. and Kallgren, C.A. 1993. The transsituational influence of social norms. Journal of personality and social psychology. 64, 1, 104.
[34]
Short, E., Hart, J., Vu, M. and Scassellati, B. 2010. No fair!! An interaction with a cheating robot. 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI'10).
[35]
Takayama, L., Ju, W. and Nass, C. 2008. Beyond Dirty, Dangerous and Dull?: What Everyday People Think Robots Should Do. HRI '08: Proceeding of the ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction.
[36]
Tanaka, F., Cicourel, A. and Movellan, J.R. 2007. Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA of America. 104, 46, 17954--8.
[37]
Tanaka, F. and Ghosh, M. 2011. The implementation of care-receiving robot at an English learning school for children. Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on 265--266.
[38]
Vazquez, M., May, A., Steinfeld, A. and Chen, W.-H. 2011. A deceptive robot referee in a multiplayer gaming environment. 2011 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS) 204--211.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Influence of Simulation and Interactivity on Human Perceptions of a Robot During Navigation TasksACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3675784Online publication date: 16-Jul-2024
  • (2024)RoSI: A Model for Predicting Robot Social InfluenceACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/364151513:2(1-22)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Field Trial of an Autonomous Shopworker Robot that Aims to Provide Friendly Encouragement and Exert Social PressureProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3635007(194-202)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
HRI '15: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
March 2015
368 pages
ISBN:9781450328838
DOI:10.1145/2696454
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 March 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. experimental study
  2. honesty
  3. human-robot interaction
  4. monitoring
  5. social presence

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

HRI '15
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

HRI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 43 of 169 submissions, 25%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)83
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11
Reflects downloads up to 03 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Influence of Simulation and Interactivity on Human Perceptions of a Robot During Navigation TasksACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3675784Online publication date: 16-Jul-2024
  • (2024)RoSI: A Model for Predicting Robot Social InfluenceACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/364151513:2(1-22)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Field Trial of an Autonomous Shopworker Robot that Aims to Provide Friendly Encouragement and Exert Social PressureProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3635007(194-202)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Investigating the Impact of Gender Stereotypes in Authority on Avatar RobotsProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3634985(106-115)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Power in Human-Robot InteractionProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3634949(269-282)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
  • (2023)"Let's Face It": Investigating User Preferences for Virtual Humanoid Home AssistantsProceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction10.1145/3623809.3623821(246-256)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2023
  • (2023)"Would I Feel More Secure With a Robot?": Understanding Perceptions of Security Robots in Public SpacesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36101717:CSCW2(1-34)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Verbally Soliciting Human Feedback in Continuous Human-Robot CollaborationProceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3568162.3576980(290-300)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2023
  • (2023)Unsocial Robots: How Western Culture Dooms Consumer Social Robots to a Society of OneExtended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544549.3582751(1-6)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2023)How do eye cues affect behaviors? Two meta-analysesCurrent Psychology10.1007/s12144-023-04395-643:2(1084-1101)Online publication date: 18-Feb-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media