Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2701973.2702023acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Trust In Unmanned Driving System

Published: 02 March 2015 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    This study proposes a between-subject experiment with four conditions representing different levels of anthropomorphism and automation embedded in unmanned driving systems. Participants will be exposed to either a humanoid robot (high anthropomorphism) or a smartphone (low anthropomorphism) that have high and low automation level respectively as an independent driving agent. The study argues that the agent with high level of anthropomorphism and low level of automation is more likely to trigger greater feelings of trust and perceived safety, which then leads to positive perceptions of the system.

    References

    [1]
    Parasuraman, R. and Miller, C.A. 2004. Trust and etiquette in high-criticality automated systems. Communications of the ACM. 47, 4 (Apr. 2004), 51--55.
    [2]
    Duffy, B.R. 2003. Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems. 42, 3--4 (Mar. 2003), 177--190.
    [3]
    Bartneck, C. et al. 2009. Does the Design of a Robot Influence Its Animacy and Perceived Intelligence? International Journal of Social Robotics. 1, 2 (Feb. 2009), 195--204.
    [4]
    Reeves, B. and Nass, C. 1997. The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television and New Media Like Real People and Places {Book Review}. Spectrum, IEEE. 34, 3 (1997), 9--10.
    [5]
    Qiu, L. and Benbasat, I. 2009. Evaluating Anthropomorphic Product Recommendation Agents: A Social Relationship Perspective to Designing Information Systems. Journal of Management Information Systems. 25, 4 (Apr. 2009), 145--182.
    [6]
    de Graaf, M.M.A. and Ben Allouch, S. 2013. Exploring influencing variables for the acceptance of social robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems. 61, 12 (Dec. 2013), 1476--1486.
    [7]
    Sheridan, T.B. and Parasuraman, R. 2005. Human Automation Interaction. Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics. 1, 1 (Jan. 2005), 89--129.
    [8]
    Parasuraman, R. and Wickens, C.D. 2008. Humans: Still vital after all these years of automation. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Soceity. 50, 3 (2008), 511--520.
    [9]
    Bartneck, C. et al. 2008. Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots. International Journal of Social Robotics. 1, 1 (Nov. 2008), 71--81.
    [10]
    Soh, H. et al. 2009. Measuring trust in advertising. Journal of Advertising. 38, 2 (2009), 83--100.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Confrontation and Obstacle-Avoidance of Unmanned Vehicles Based on Progressive Reinforcement LearningIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.327859711(50398-50411)Online publication date: 2023
    • (2020)Comparing the Effects of False Alarms and Misses on Humans' Trust in (Semi)Autonomous VehiclesCompanion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3371382.3378371(113-115)Online publication date: 23-Mar-2020
    • (undefined)Using Trust in Automation to Enhance Driver-(Semi)Autonomous Vehicle Interaction and Improve Team PerformanceSSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.3859704

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    HRI'15 Extended Abstracts: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Extended Abstracts
    March 2015
    336 pages
    ISBN:9781450333184
    DOI:10.1145/2701973
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 02 March 2015

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. anthropomorphism
    2. automation
    3. perceived safety
    4. trust
    5. unmanned driving system

    Qualifiers

    • Abstract

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    HRI '15
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    HRI'15 Extended Abstracts Paper Acceptance Rate 92 of 102 submissions, 90%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 192 of 519 submissions, 37%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 11 Aug 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Confrontation and Obstacle-Avoidance of Unmanned Vehicles Based on Progressive Reinforcement LearningIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.327859711(50398-50411)Online publication date: 2023
    • (2020)Comparing the Effects of False Alarms and Misses on Humans' Trust in (Semi)Autonomous VehiclesCompanion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3371382.3378371(113-115)Online publication date: 23-Mar-2020
    • (undefined)Using Trust in Automation to Enhance Driver-(Semi)Autonomous Vehicle Interaction and Improve Team PerformanceSSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.3859704

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media