research-article

Gender and Tenure Diversity in GitHub Teams

Authors:

Bogdan Vasilescu,

Mark G.J. van den Brand,

Alexander Serebrenik,

Premkumar Devanbu,

Vladimir FilkovAuthors Info & Claims

CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Pages 3789 - 3798

https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702549

Published: 18 April 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Software development is usually a collaborative venture. Open Source Software (OSS) projects are no exception; indeed, by design, the OSS approach can accommodate teams that are more open, geographically distributed, and dynamic than commercial teams. This, we find, leads to OSS teams that are quite diverse. Team diversity, predominantly in offline groups, is known to correlate with team output, mostly with positive effects. How about in OSS? Using GitHub, the largest publicly available collection of OSS projects, we studied how gender and tenure diversity relate to team productivity and turnover. Using regression modeling of GitHub data and the results of a survey, we show that both gender and tenure diversity are positive and significant predictors of productivity, together explaining a sizable fraction of the data variability. These results can inform decision making on all levels, leading to better outcomes in recruiting and performance.

Supplementary Material

Erratum (chi2015erratum.pdf)

Erratum for CHI '15 paper: Gender and Tenure Diversity in GitHub Teams. July 8, 2015

Download
100.28 KB

References

[1]

Apesteguia, J., Azmat, G., and Iriberri, N. The impact of gender composition on team performance and decision making: Evidence from the field. Manage. Sci. 58, 1 (2012), 78--93.

Digital Library

[2]

Aries, E. Interaction patterns and themes of male, female, and mixed groups. Small Group Behavior (1976).

[3]

Bates, D. M. lme4: Mixed-effects modeling with R, 2010.

[4]

Begel, A., and Nagappan, N. Usage and perceptions of agile software development in an industrial context: An exploratory study. In ESEM, IEEE (2007), 255--264.

Digital Library

[5]

Bird, C., et al. Mining email social networks. In MSR, ACM (2006), 137--143.

Digital Library

[6]

Bird, C., et al. Open borders' immigration in open source projects. In MSR, IEEE (2007), 6.

Digital Library

[7]

Bird, C., et al. Latent social structure in open source projects. In FSE, ACM (2008), 24--35.

Digital Library

[8]

Bird, C., et al. Does distributed development affect software quality?: An empirical case study of Windows Vista. CACM 52, 8 (2009), 85--93.

Digital Library

[9]

Bird, C., et al. The promises and perils of mining git. In MSR, IEEE (2009), 1--10.

Digital Library

[10]

Blau, P. M. Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure, vol. 7. Free Press NY, 1977.

[11]

Brooks, F. P. The mythical man-month, vol. 1995. Addison-Wesley Reading, MA, 1975.

Digital Library

[12]

Byrne, D. E. The attraction paradigm. Personality and psychopathology. Academic Press, 1971.

[13]

Chen, J., et al. The effects of diversity on group productivity and member withdrawal in online volunteer groups. In CHI, ACM (2010), 821--830.

Digital Library

[14]

Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.

[15]

Croson, R., and Gneezy, U. Gender differences in preferences. J. Econ. Lit. (2009), 448--474.

[16]

Dabbish, L., et al. Social coding in GitHub: transparency and collaboration in an open software repository. In CSCW, ACM (2012), 1277--1286.

Digital Library

[17]

Dabbish, L., et al. Leveraging transparency. IEEE Software 30, 1 (2013), 37--43.

Digital Library

[18]

Daniel, S., et al. The effects of diversity in global, distributed collectives: A study of open source project success. Inform. Syst. Res. 24, 2 (2013), 312--333.

[19]

David, P. A., and Shapiro, J. S. Community-based production of open-source software: What do we know about the developers who participate? Information Economics and Policy 20, 4 (2008), 364--398.

[20]

de Gilder, D., and Wilke, H. A. M. Expectation states theory and the motivational determinants of social influence. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 5, 1 (1994), 243--269.

[21]

de O. Melo, C., et al. Interpretative case studies on agile team productivity and management. Inform. Software Tech. 55, 2 (2013), 412--427.

Digital Library

[22]

Domingos, P. A few useful things to know about machine learning. CACM 55, 10 (2012), 78--87.

Digital Library

[23]

Ducheneaut, N. Socialization in an open source software community: A socio-technical analysis. CSCW 14, 4 (2005), 323--368.

Digital Library

[24]

Earley, C. P., and Mosakowski, E. Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. Acad. Manag. J. 43, 1 (2000), 26--49.

[25]

Easterbrook, S., et al. Selecting empirical methods for software engineering research. In Guide Adv. Empir. Softw. Eng. Springer, 2008, 285--311.

[26]

Feller, J., and Fitzgerald, B. A framework analysis of the open source software development paradigm. In ICIS, Association for Information Systems (2000), 58--69.

Digital Library

[27]

Goeminne, M., and Mens, T. A comparison of identity merge algorithms for software repositories. Science of Computer Programming 78, 8 (2013), 971--986.

Digital Library

[28]

Gould, R. V. The origins of status hierarchies: A formal theory and empirical test. Am. J. Sociol. 107, 5 (2002), 1143--1178.

[29]

Gousios, G. The GHTorent dataset and tool suite. In MSR, IEEE (2013), 233--236.

Digital Library

[30]

Harrison, D. A., et al. Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Acad. Manag. J. 41, 1 (1998), 96--107.

[31]

Horwitz, S. K., and Horwitz, I. B. The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. J. Manag. 33, 6 (2007), 987--1015.

[32]

Howison, J., et al. Validity issues in the use of social network analysis with digital trace data. JAIS 12 (2011).

[33]

Jackson, S. E., and Joshi, A. Diversity in social context: a multi-attribute, multilevel analysis of team diversity and sales performance. J. Organ. Behav. 25, 6 (2004), 675--702.

[34]

Kalliamvakou, E., et al. The promises and perils of mining GitHub. In MSR, ACM (2014).

Digital Library

[35]

Kouters, E., et al. Who's who in Gnome: Using LSA to merge software repository identities. In ICSM (2012), 592--595.

Digital Library

[36]

Lakhani, K. R., and Von Hippel, E. How open source software works: "free" user-to-user assistance. Research Policy 32, 6 (2003), 923--943.

[37]

Lee, M. J., et al. GitHub developers use rockstars to overcome overflow of news. In CHI, ACM (2013), 133--138.

Digital Library

[38]

Lipsey, M., et al. Translating the statistical representation of the effects of education interventions into more readily interpretable forms. Tech. Rep. NCSER 2013--3000, U.S. Dept of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, 2012.

[39]

Marlow, J., et al. Impression formation in online peer production: activity traces and personal profiles in GitHub. In CSCW, ACM (2013), 117--128.

Digital Library

[40]

Martins, L. L., et al. Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? J. Manag. 30, 6 (2004), 805--835.

[41]

McDonald, N., and Goggins, S. Performance and participation in open source software on GitHub. In CHI, ACM (2013), 139--144.

Digital Library

[42]

Michailidou, A., and Economides, A. Gender and diversity in collaborative virtual teams. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning: Best practices and principles for instructors (2007), 199--224.

[43]

Molleman, E., and Slomp, J. The impact of team and work characteristics on team functioning. Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. 16, 1 (2006), 1--15.

Digital Library

[44]

Nafus, D. 'Patches don't have gender': What is not open in open source software. New Media & Society 14, 4 (2012), 669--683.

[45]

Oreg, S., and Nov, O. Exploring motivations for contributing to open source initiatives: The roles of contribution context and personal values. Comput. Hum. Behav. 24, 5 (2008), 2055--2073.

Digital Library

[46]

O'Reilly III, C. A., et al. Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1989), 21--37.

[47]

Preece, J., and Shneiderman, B. The reader-to-leader framework: Motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS Trans. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, 1 (2009), 13--32.

[48]

Riordan, C. M., and Shore, L. M. Demographic diversity and employee attitudes: An empirical examination of relational demography within work units. J. Appl. Psychol. 82, 3 (1997), 342.

[49]

Robles, G., et al. FLOSS 2013: A survey dataset about free software contributors: challenges for curating, sharing, and combining. In MSR, ACM (2014), 396--399.

Digital Library

[50]

Robles, G., and Gonzalez-Barahona, J. M. Contributor turnover in libre software projects. In Open Source Systems. Springer, 2006, 273--286.

[51]

Rogelberg, S. G., and Rumery, S. M. Gender diversity, team decision quality, time on task, and interpersonal cohesion. Small Group Research 27, 1 (1996), 79--90.

[52]

Salancik, G. R., and Pfeffer, J. A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Admin. Sci. Quart. 23, 2 (1978), 224--253.

[53]

Simmons, J., et al. False-positive psychology undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychol. Sci. 22, 11 (2011).

[54]

Stahl, G. K., et al. Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: A meta-analysis of research on multicultural work groups. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 41, 4 (2010), 690--709.

[55]

Tajfel, H. Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 33, 1 (1982), 1--39.

[56]

Takhteyev, Y., and Hilts, A. Investigating the geography of open source software through GitHub, 2010.

[57]

Tao, Y., et al. How do software engineers understand code changes?: An exploratory study in industry. In FSE, ACM (2012), 51:1--51:11.

Digital Library

[58]

Turkle, S. The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit. MIT Press, 2005.

[59]

Vasilescu, B., Capiluppi, A., and Serebrenik, A. Gender, representation and online participation: A quantitative study. Interacting with Computers (2013), 1--24.

[60]

Vasilescu, B., et al. StackOverflow and GitHub: Associations between software development and crowdsourced knowledge. In SocialCom, IEEE (2013), 188--195.

Digital Library

[61]

Vasilescu, B., et al. How social Q&A sites are changing knowledge sharing in open source software communities. In CSCW, ACM (2014), 342--354.

Digital Library

[62]

Vasilescu, B., et al. On the variation and specialisation of workload-A case study of the Gnome ecosystem community. Empir. Softw. Eng. 19, 4 (2014), 955--1008.

Digital Library

[63]

Wang, L., et al. Searching for the goldilocks zone: trade-offs in managing online volunteer groups. In CSCW, ACM (2012), 989--998.

Digital Library

[64]

Watson, W. E., et al. Cultural diversity's impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Acad. Manag. J. 36, 3 (1993), 590--602.

[65]

Weyuker, E. J., et al. Do too many cooks spoil the broth? using the number of developers to enhance defect prediction models. Empir. Softw. Eng. 13, 5 (2008), 539--559.

Digital Library

[66]

Williams, K. Y., and O'Reilly, C. A. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Res. Organ. Behav. 20 (1998), 77--140.

[67]

Ye, Y., and Kishida, K. Toward an understanding of the motivation of open source software developers. In ICSE, IEEE (2003), 419--429.

Digital Library

[68]

Zellmer-Bruhn, M. E., et al. When and how do differences matter? an exploration of perceived similarity in teams. Organ. Behav. Hum. Dec. 107, 1 (2008), 41--59.

Cited By

Santos IFelizardo KSteinmacher IGerosa M(2025)Software solutions for newcomers’ onboarding in software projects: A systematic literature reviewInformation and Software Technology10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107568177(107568)Online publication date: Jan-2025
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107568
da Rocha Tde Souza CTeran LMota M(2024)Effective Inclusion of People with Disabilities in Software Development TeamsProceedings of the 18th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement10.1145/3674805.3690749(447-453)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3674805.3690749
Cutrupi C(2024)Human-Centered Interventions to Empower Gender Diversity in Software EngineeringProceedings of the 28th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering10.1145/3661167.3661182(494-499)Online publication date: 18-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3661167.3661182
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Gender and Tenure Diversity in GitHub Teams
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Collaborative and social computing
    1. Collaborative and social computing theory, concepts and paradigms
      1. Computer supported cooperative work
2. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Computing and business
      1. Computer supported cooperative work

Recommendations

Influence of social and technical factors for evaluating contribution in GitHub
ICSE 2014: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering

Open source software is commonly portrayed as a meritocracy, where decisions are based solely on their technical merit. However, literature on open source suggests a complex social structure underlying the meritocracy. Social work environments such as ...
Investigating the effects of gender bias on GitHub
ICSE '19: Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Software Engineering

Diversity, including gender diversity, is valued by many software development organizations, yet the field remains dominated by men. One reason for this lack of diversity is gender bias. In this paper, we study the effects of that bias by using an ...
Gender and Participation in Open Source Software Development
CSCW

Open source software represents an important form of digital infrastructure as well as a pathway to technical careers for many developers, but women are drastically underrepresented in this setting. Although there is a good body of literature on open ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 2015

4290 pages

ISBN:9781450331456

DOI:10.1145/2702123

General Chairs:
Bo Begole
Huawei, USA
,
Jinwoo Kim
Yonsei University, Korea
,
Program Chairs:
Kori Inkpen
Microsoft Research, USA
,
Woontack Woo
KAIST, Korea

Copyright © 2015 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 18 April 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

CHI '15

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '15: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 18 - 23, 2015

Seoul, Republic of Korea

Acceptance Rates

CHI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 486 of 2,120 submissions, 23%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

217
Total Citations
View Citations
2,683
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)255
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)20

Reflects downloads up to 10 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Santos IFelizardo KSteinmacher IGerosa M(2025)Software solutions for newcomers’ onboarding in software projects: A systematic literature reviewInformation and Software Technology10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107568177(107568)Online publication date: Jan-2025
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107568
da Rocha Tde Souza CTeran LMota M(2024)Effective Inclusion of People with Disabilities in Software Development TeamsProceedings of the 18th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement10.1145/3674805.3690749(447-453)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3674805.3690749
Cutrupi C(2024)Human-Centered Interventions to Empower Gender Diversity in Software EngineeringProceedings of the 28th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering10.1145/3661167.3661182(494-499)Online publication date: 18-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3661167.3661182
Tan XGong YHuang GWu HZhang L(2024)How to Gain Commit Rights in Modern Top Open Source Communities?Proceedings of the ACM on Software Engineering10.1145/36607841:FSE(1727-1749)Online publication date: 12-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3660784
Jaccheri L(2024)Women and Software EngineeringACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes10.1145/3650142.365014749:2(16-18)Online publication date: 3-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3650142.3650147
Saied MElfatatry AGuirguis S(2024)Conceptual Framework for Software ChangeIT Professional10.1109/MITP.2023.333845526:2(57-66)Online publication date: 3-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/MITP.2023.3338455
Liang WRajani NYang XOzoani EWu EChen YSmith DZou J(2024)Systematic analysis of 32,111 AI model cards characterizes documentation practice in AINature Machine Intelligence10.1038/s42256-024-00857-z6:7(744-753)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-024-00857-z
Wallrich LOpara VWesołowska MBarnoth DYousefi S(2024)The Relationship Between Team Diversity and Team Performance: Reconciling Promise and Reality Through a Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Registered ReportJournal of Business and Psychology10.1007/s10869-024-09977-0Online publication date: 29-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-024-09977-0
Rocha LCanedo EPereira CBezerra CMendes F(2024)How does parenthood affect an ICT practitioner’s work? A survey study with fathersEmpirical Software Engineering10.1007/s10664-024-10534-929:6Online publication date: 1-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10664-024-10534-9
Murali ASahu GThangarajah KZimmerman BRodríguez-Pérez GNagappan M(2024)Diversity in issue assignment: humans vs botsEmpirical Software Engineering10.1007/s10664-023-10424-629:2Online publication date: 9-Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-023-10424-6
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents