Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

EngageCSEdu: engaging and retaining CS1 and CS2 students

Published: 09 February 2015 Publication History

Abstract

While the number of students interested in computer science is rising, the percentage of women and underrepresented minorities remains low. Many things influence whether a student will pursue a degree in computer science, but having a great experience in introductory courses is essential. The National Center for Women & Information Technology (NCWIT) has partnered with Google to create EngageCSEdu, a comprehensive and growing collection of instructional materials and pedagogical strategies for engaging and retaining undergraduate students in introductory computing courses. This article introduces the key features of EngageCSEdu and the peer-reviewed system for creating and growing the collection.

References

[1]
Ali, A. and Shubra, C. "Efforts to Reverse the Trend of Enrollment Decline in Computer Science Programs." Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology 7 (2010): 209--224; http://iisit.org/Vol7/IISITv7p209-224Ali825.pdf. Accessed 2014 September 3.
[2]
Aronson, J., et al. "When White Men Can't Do Math: Necessary and Sufficient Factors in Stereotype Threat." Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 1 (January 1999): 29--46.
[3]
Barker, L.J., Hovey, C.L. and Thompson, L.D. "Results of a Large-Scale, Multi-Institutional Study of Undergraduate Retention in Computing." In The 44th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. (Madrid, Spain, 2014).
[4]
Barker, L. J. and Cohoon, J. M. Key Practices for Retaining Undergraduates in Computing. (Boulder, CO: National Center for Women & Information Technology, 2009).
[5]
Barker, L. J., McDowell, C., and Kalahar, K. "Exploring Factors that Influence Computer Science Introductory Course Students to Persist in the Major." In Proceedings Of The 40th ACM Technical Symposium On Computer Science Education, 41, 1 (New York, NY: ACM, 2009): 153--157.
[6]
Cohoon, J. P. and Tychonievich, L. A. "Analysis Of A CS1 Approach for Attracting Diverse and Inexperienced Students to Computing Majors." In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. (New York, NY: ACM, 2011): 165--170.
[7]
Cohoon, J. M. "Recruiting and Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing Majors." SIGCSE Bulletin 34, 2 (2002).
[8]
DeClue, T.H. "Pair Programming and Pair Trading: Effects on Learning and Motivation in a CS2 Course." Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 18, 5 (2003): 49--56.
[9]
Dweck, C. "The Perils and Promises of Praise." Educational Leadership, 65, 2 (2007): 34--39.
[10]
EngageCSEdu; http://www.engage-csedu.org. Accessed 2014 January 3.
[11]
Ensemble Computing Portal: Connecting Computing Educators; http://computingportal.org. Accessed 2014 September 4.
[12]
Grossman, R. W., et al. 2008. Stereotype Threat and Recommendations for Overcoming It: A Teaching Case Study. National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science; http://sciencecases.lib.buffalo.edu/cs/collection/detail.asp?case_id=627&id=627. Accessed 2014 September 4.
[13]
Guzdial, M. 2013. "Exploring Hypotheses About Media Computation." In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual International ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (New York, NY: ACM, 2013): 19--26.
[14]
Guzdial, M. "Does Contextualized Computing Education Help?" ACM Inroads, 1, 4 (December 2010): 4--6.
[15]
Hill, C., Corbett, C. and St. Rose, A. Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. (Washington, DC: AAUW, 2010).
[16]
Hu, H.H. and Shepherd, T.D. "Teaching CS 1 with POGIL Activities and Roles." In Proceedings Of The 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (New York, NY: ACM, 2014): 127--132.
[17]
Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula. Computer Science Curricula 2013: Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Computer Science. (ACM and IEEE, 2013); http://www.acm.org/education/CS2013-final-report.pdf. Accessed 2014 September 4.
[18]
Landivar, L. C. Disparities in STEM Employment by Sex, Race, and Hispanic Origin: American Community Survey Reports. (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration, 2013).
[19]
Lazowska, E., Roberts, E. and Kurose, J. "Tsunami or Sea Change? Responding to the Explosion of Student Interest in Computer Science." Presented at Annual Summit of the National Center for Women & Information Technology (NCWIT) (Newport Beach, CA: May 21, 2014) and at the CRA Conference (Snowbird, Utah, July 2, 2014); http://lazowska.cs.washington.edu/NCWIT.pdf. Accessed 2014 September 3.
[20]
Lewis, C., et al. CSTeachingTips; http://csteachingtips.org. Accessed 2014 September 4.
[21]
Margolis, J. and Fisher, A. Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002).
[22]
Margulieux, L. E., Guzdial, M., and Catrambone, R. "Subgoal-labeled instructional material improves performance and transfer in learning to develop mobile applications." In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research. (New York, NY: ACM, 2012): 71--78.
[23]
National Center for Women & Information Technology and Google, Inc. EngageCSEdu: Engagement Practices; http://www.engage-csedu.org/engagement. Accessed 2014 September 3.
[24]
Parlante, N. Nifty Assignments; http://nifty.stanford.edu. Accessed 2014 September 4.
[25]
Porter, L. and Simon, B. "Retaining Nearly One-Third More Majors with a Trio of Instructional Best Practices in CS1." In Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. (New York, NY: ACM, 2013): 165--170;
[26]
Porter, L., Lee, C.B. and Simon, B. "Halving Fail Rates Using Peer Instruction: A Study of Four Computer Science Courses." In Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. (New York, NY: ACM, 2013): 177--182;
[27]
Powell, R. M. "Improving the Persistence of First-Year Undergraduate Women in Computer Science." In Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. (New York, NY: ACM, 2008): 518--522.
[28]
Roberts, E.S. "Meeting the Challenges of Rising Enrollments." ACM Inroads 2, 3 (August 2011): 4--6.
[29]
Shih, M., Pittinsky, M., and Trahan, A. "Domain-Specific Effects of Stereotypes on Performance." Self and Identity, 5, 1 (Feb 2007): 1--14.
[30]
Snyder, T. D., and Dillow, S.A. Digest of Education Statistics 2012 (NCES 2014--015). (Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, 2014).
[31]
Steele, C. M. and Aronson, J. "Stereotype Threat and the Intellectual Test Performance of African Americans." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 5 (Nov 1995): 797--811;
[32]
Werner, L., et al. "Want to Increase Retention of your Female Students?" Computing Research News, 17, 2. (March 2005).
[33]
Zweben, S. and Bizot, B. "2013 Taulbee Survey: Second Consecutive Year of Record Doctoral Degree Production; Continued Strong Undergraduate CS Enrollment." Computing Research News, 26, 5 (May 2014): 10--55.
[34]
Zweben, S. Computing Degree and Enrollment Trends. (Washington, DC: Computing Research Association, 2014); http://cra.org/uploads/documents/resources/taulbee/CRA_Taulbee_CS_Degrees_and_Enrollment_2012-13.pdf. Accessed 2014 September 3.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Equitable Student Persistence in Computing Research Through Distributed Career MentorshipProceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3545945.3569789(94-100)Online publication date: 2-Mar-2023
  • (2022)Stop Reinventing the Wheel! Promoting Community Software in Computing EducationProceedings of the 2022 Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education10.1145/3571785.3574129(261-292)Online publication date: 27-Dec-2022
  • (2022)Learning about the Experiences of Chicano/Latino Students in a Large Undergraduate CS ProgramProceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education Vol. 110.1145/3502718.3524780(165-171)Online publication date: 7-Jul-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Inroads
ACM Inroads  Volume 6, Issue 1
March 2015
59 pages
ISSN:2153-2184
EISSN:2153-2192
DOI:10.1145/2735450
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 09 February 2015
Published in INROADS Volume 6, Issue 1

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. curriculum
  2. diversity
  3. living collection
  4. repository
  5. student engagement
  6. student retention
  7. women in technology

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Popular
  • Un-reviewed

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)18
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Equitable Student Persistence in Computing Research Through Distributed Career MentorshipProceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3545945.3569789(94-100)Online publication date: 2-Mar-2023
  • (2022)Stop Reinventing the Wheel! Promoting Community Software in Computing EducationProceedings of the 2022 Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education10.1145/3571785.3574129(261-292)Online publication date: 27-Dec-2022
  • (2022)Learning about the Experiences of Chicano/Latino Students in a Large Undergraduate CS ProgramProceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education Vol. 110.1145/3502718.3524780(165-171)Online publication date: 7-Jul-2022
  • (2022)Designing Programming Games for Diversity in Teaching Introductory ProgrammingICT Education10.1007/978-3-030-92858-2_2(19-36)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
  • (2021)Evidence for Teaching Practices that Broaden Participation for Women in ComputingProceedings of the 2021 Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education10.1145/3502870.3506568(57-131)Online publication date: 28-Dec-2021
  • (2021)CONVERSATIONS: Conversation with a prominent propagatorACM Inroads10.1145/349017812:4(6-9)Online publication date: 15-Nov-2021
  • (2021)Chronicling the Evidence for Broadening ParticipationProceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 210.1145/3456565.3461441(601-602)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2021
  • (2021)Nifty Web AppsProceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education10.1145/3408877.3432580(1236-1237)Online publication date: 3-Mar-2021
  • (2021)Including Computer Systems Assignments in Introductory Programming Courses2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637341(1-5)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2021
  • (2021)CS-materials: A system for classifying and analyzing pedagogical materials to improve adoption of parallel and distributed computing topics in early CS coursesJournal of Parallel and Distributed Computing10.1016/j.jpdc.2021.05.014Online publication date: Jul-2021
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Digital Edition

View this article in digital edition.

Digital Edition

Magazine Site

View this article on the magazine site (external)

Magazine Site

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media