Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2728606.2728620acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescpsweekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A viability approach for fast recursive feasible finite horizon path planning of autonomous RC cars

Published: 14 April 2015 Publication History

Abstract

We consider a viability based approach to guarantee recursive feasibility of a finite horizon path planner. The path planner is formulated as a hybrid system for which a difference inclusion reformulation is derived by exploiting the special structure of the problem. Based on this approximation, the viability kernel, which characterizes all safe states and the corresponding safe controls, can be calculated. Using the set of safe controls the computation time of the on-line path planning can be reduced, by only generating viable trajectories. Finally, a condition characterizing the unsafe set in case of on-line obstacle avoidance is derived.

References

[1]
J.-P. Aubin, A. M. Bayen, and P. Saint-Pierre. Viability Theory, New Directions. Springer, 2011.
[2]
J.-P. Aubin, J. Lygeros, M. Quincampoix, S. Sastry, and N. Seube. Impulse differential inclusions: a viability approach to hybrid systems. IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control, 47: 2--20, 2002.
[3]
J.-P. Aubin, D. Pujal, and P. Saint-Pierre. Dynamic management of portfolios with transaction costs under tychastic uncertainty. Springer, 2005.
[4]
E. Bakker, L. Nyborg, and H. Pacejka. Tyre modelling for use in vehicle dynamics studies. SAE, 1987.
[5]
E. Frazzoli, M. Dahleh, and E. Feron. Maneuver-based motion planning for nonlinear systems with symmetries. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 21(6): 1077--1091, 2005.
[6]
Y. Gao, T. Lin, F. Borrelli, E. Tseng, and D. Hrovat. Predictive control of autonomous ground vehicles with obstacle avoidance on slippery roads. Proceedings of DSCC, 2010.
[7]
A. Gray, Y. Gao, T. Lin, J. K. Hedrick, H. E. Tseng, and F. Borrelli. Predictive control for agile semi-autonomous ground vehicles using motion primitives. In American Control Conference (ACC), pages 4239--4244. IEEE, 2012.
[8]
L. Grüne and J. Pannek. Nonlinear Model Predictive Control. Springer London, 2011.
[9]
M. Herceg, M. Kvasnica, C. Jones, and M. Morari. Multi-Parametric Toolbox 3.0. In Proc. of the European Control Conference, pages 502--510, Zürich, Switzerland, July 17--19 2013. http://control.ee.ethz.ch/~mpt.
[10]
M. Kalisiak and M. van de Panne. Faster motion planning using learned local viability models. In International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 2700--2705, 2007.
[11]
E. Kerrigan and M. Maciejowski, J. Invariant sets for constrained nonlinear discrete-time systems with application to feasibility in model predictive control. In Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pages 4951--4956, 2000.
[12]
I. Kitsios and J. Lygeros. Aerodynamic envelope computation for safe landing of the hl-20 personnel launch vehicle using hybrid control. In International Symposium on Intelligent Control, pages 231--236, 2005.
[13]
A. Liniger, A. Domahidi, and M. Morari. Optimization-based autonomous racing of 1:43 scale rc cars. Optimal Control Applications and Methods, pages 1--19, 2014.
[14]
J. Lygeros. On reachabiltiy and minimum cost optimal control. Automatica, 40: 917--927, 2004.
[15]
J. Lygeros, K. H. Johansson, S. N. Simic, J. Zhang, and S. S. Sastry. Dynamical properties of hybrid automata. IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control, 48: 2--17, 2003.
[16]
K. Margellos and J. Lygeros. Viable set computation for hybrid systems. Nonlinear Analysis: Hybrid Systems, 10: 45--62, 2013.
[17]
R. Moitie and N. Seube. Guidance algorithms for uuvs obstacle avoidance systems. In OCEANS 2000 MTS/IEEE Conference and Exhibition, volume 3, pages 1853--1860. IEEE, 2000.
[18]
D. Panagou, K. Margellos, S. Summers, J. Lygeros, and K. J. Kyriakopoulos. A viability approach for the stabilization of an underactuated underwater vehicle in the presence of current disturbances. In Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pages 8612--8617, 2005.
[19]
P. Saint-Pierre. Approximation of the viability kernel. Applied Mathematics and Optimization, pages 187--209, 1994.
[20]
N. Seube, R. Moitie, and G. Leitmann. Aircraft take-off in windshear: a viability approach. Set-Valued Analysis, 8(1--2): 163--180, 2000.
[21]
A. Tinka, S. Diemer, L. Madureira, E. B. Marques, J. B. De Sousa, R. Martins, J. Pinto, J. E. Da Silva, A. Sousa, P. Saint-Pierre, and A. M. Bayen. Viability-based computation of spatially constrained minimum time trajectories for an autonomous underwater vehicle: Implementation and experiments. In Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pages 3603--3610, 2009.
[22]
T. A. Wood, P. Mohajerin Esfahani, and J. Lygeros. Hybrid modelling and reachability on autonomous rc-cars. In Analysis and Design of Hybrid Systems, pages 430--435, 2012.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Survey of Vehicle Dynamics Modeling Methods for Autonomous Racing: Theoretical Models, Physical/Virtual Platforms, and PerspectivesIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles10.1109/TIV.2024.33511319:3(4312-4334)Online publication date: Mar-2024
  • (2023)TUM autonomous motorsport: An autonomous racing software for the Indy Autonomous ChallengeJournal of Field Robotics10.1002/rob.2215340:4(783-809)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2023
  • (2022)Efficient Spatiotemporal Graph Search for Local Trajectory Planning on Oval Race TracksActuators10.3390/act1111031911:11(319)Online publication date: 3-Nov-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. A viability approach for fast recursive feasible finite horizon path planning of autonomous RC cars

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HSCC '15: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control
      April 2015
      321 pages
      ISBN:9781450334334
      DOI:10.1145/2728606
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 14 April 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. autonomous driving
      2. hybrid systems
      3. path planning
      4. viability theory

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      HSCC '15
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 153 of 373 submissions, 41%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)34
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
      Reflects downloads up to 13 Sep 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)A Survey of Vehicle Dynamics Modeling Methods for Autonomous Racing: Theoretical Models, Physical/Virtual Platforms, and PerspectivesIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles10.1109/TIV.2024.33511319:3(4312-4334)Online publication date: Mar-2024
      • (2023)TUM autonomous motorsport: An autonomous racing software for the Indy Autonomous ChallengeJournal of Field Robotics10.1002/rob.2215340:4(783-809)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2023
      • (2022)Efficient Spatiotemporal Graph Search for Local Trajectory Planning on Oval Race TracksActuators10.3390/act1111031911:11(319)Online publication date: 3-Nov-2022
      • (2022)Autonomous Vehicles on the Edge: A Survey on Autonomous Vehicle RacingIEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems10.1109/OJITS.2022.31815103(458-488)Online publication date: 2022
      • (2022)Winning the 3rd Japan Automotive AI Challenge - Autonomous Racing with the Autoware.Auto Open Source Software Stack2022 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)10.1109/IV51971.2022.9827162(1757-1764)Online publication date: 5-Jun-2022
      • (2021)Robust and Recursively Feasible Real-Time Trajectory Planning in Unknown Environments2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)10.1109/IROS51168.2021.9636048(1434-1441)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2021
      • (2021)Hybrid Car Trajectory by Genetic Algorithms with Non-Uniform Key FramingAdvances in Artificial Intelligence and Applied Cognitive Computing10.1007/978-3-030-70296-0_29(369-380)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2021
      • (2019)Trajectory optimization for car races using genetic algorithmsProceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion10.1145/3319619.3326792(85-86)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2019
      • (2019)Real-Time Control for Autonomous Racing Based on Viability TheoryIEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology10.1109/TCST.2017.277290327:2(464-478)Online publication date: Mar-2019
      • (2018)Global to Local for Path Decision using Neural NetworksProceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence10.1145/3243250.3243269(117-123)Online publication date: 15-Aug-2018
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media