Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2740908.2742573acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Crowdsourced Rumour Identification During Emergencies

Published: 18 May 2015 Publication History

Abstract

When a significant event occurs, many social media users leverage platforms such as Twitter to track that event. Moreover, emergency response agencies are increasingly looking to social media as a source of real-time information about such events. However, false information and rumours are often spread during such events, which can influence public opinion and limit the usefulness of social media for emergency management. In this paper, we present an initial study into rumour identification during emergencies using crowdsourcing. In particular, through an analysis of three tweet datasets relating to emergency events from 2014, we propose a taxonomy of tweets relating to rumours. We then perform a crowdsourced labeling experiment to determine whether crowd assessors can identify rumour-related tweets and where such labeling can fail. Our results show that overall, agreement over the tweet labels produced were high (0.7634 Fleiss Kappa), indicating that crowd-based rumour labeling is possible. However, not all tweets are of equal difficulty to assess. Indeed, we show that tweets containing disputed/controversial information tend to be some of the most difficult to identify.

References

[1]
F. H. Allport and M. Lepkin. Wartime rumors of waste and special privilege: why some people believe them. Abnormal and Social Psychology, 40(1):3, 1945.
[2]
G. W. Allport and L. Postman. The psychology of rumor. 1947.
[3]
O. Alonso and R. Baeza-Yates. Design and implementation of relevance assessments using crowdsourcing. In Advances in information retrieval, pages 153--164. Springer, 2011.
[4]
C. Castillo, M. Mendoza, and B. Poblete. Information credibility on Twitter. In Proc. of WWW, 2011.
[5]
M.-C. De Marneffe, A. N. Rafferty, and C. D. Manning. Finding contradictions in text. In Proc of ACL:HLT, 2008.
[6]
L. Derczynski and K. Bontcheva. Pheme: Veracity in digital social networks. In Proc of ISA, 2014.
[7]
N. DiFonzo and P. Bordia. Rumor, gossip and urban legends. Diogenes, 54(1):19--35, 2007.
[8]
R. Ennals, D. Byler, J. M. Agosta, and B. Rosario. What is disputed on the web? In Proc. of IC, 2010.
[9]
J. Leskovec, L. Backstrom, and J. Kleinberg. Meme-tracking and the dynamics of the news cycle. In Proc. of SIGKDD, 2009.
[10]
R. McCreadie, C. Macdonald, and I. Ounis. Identifying top news using crowdsourcing. Information Retrieval, 16(2):179--209, 2013.
[11]
S. Muralidharan, L. Rasmussen, D. Patterson, and J.-H. Shin. Hope for Haiti: An analysis of Facebook and Twitter usage during the earthquake relief efforts. Public Relations Review, 37(2):175--177, 2011.
[12]
T. Newburn. Reading the riots. British Society of Criminology Newsletter, page 12, 2011.
[13]
V. Qazvinian, E. Rosengren, D. R. Radev, and Q. Mei. Rumor has it: Identifying misinformation in microblogs. In Proc. of EMNLP, 2011.
[14]
J. Ratkiewicz, M. Conover, M. Meiss, B. Gonçalves, S. Patil, A. Flammini, and F. Menczer. Detecting and tracking the spread of astroturf memes in microblog streams. arXiv, 1011.3768, 2010.
[15]
A. Ritter, D. Downey, S. Soderland, and O. Etzioni. It's a contradiction--no, it's not: a case study using functional relations. In Proc. of EMNLP, 2008.
[16]
T. Sakaki, M. Okazaki, and Y. Matsuo. Earthquake shakes Twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors. In Proc. of WWW, 2010.
[17]
J. S. Vitter. Random sampling with a reservoir. ACM Trans. on Mathematical Software, 11(1):37--57, 1985.
[18]
E. M. Voorhees and D. M. Tice. Building a question answering test collection. In Proc. of SIGIR, 2000.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)AI as an Apolitical Referee: Using Alternative Sources to Decrease Partisan Biases in the Processing of Fact-Checking MessagesDigital Journalism10.1080/21670811.2023.2254820(1-22)Online publication date: 14-Sep-2023
  • (2022)Rumor detection based on a Source-Replies conversation Tree Convolutional Neural NetComputing10.1007/s00607-021-01034-5104:5(1155-1171)Online publication date: 13-Jan-2022
  • (2021)Rumor surveillance methods in outbreaks: A systematic literature reviewHealth Promotion Perspectives10.34172/hpp.2021.0311:1(12-19)Online publication date: 7-Feb-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Crowdsourced Rumour Identification During Emergencies

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    WWW '15 Companion: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web
    May 2015
    1602 pages
    ISBN:9781450334730
    DOI:10.1145/2740908

    Sponsors

    • IW3C2: International World Wide Web Conference Committee

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 18 May 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. crowdsourcing
    2. emergency management
    3. rumor identification
    4. social media
    5. super project

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • European Commission SUPER Project

    Conference

    WWW '15
    Sponsor:
    • IW3C2

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)AI as an Apolitical Referee: Using Alternative Sources to Decrease Partisan Biases in the Processing of Fact-Checking MessagesDigital Journalism10.1080/21670811.2023.2254820(1-22)Online publication date: 14-Sep-2023
    • (2022)Rumor detection based on a Source-Replies conversation Tree Convolutional Neural NetComputing10.1007/s00607-021-01034-5104:5(1155-1171)Online publication date: 13-Jan-2022
    • (2021)Rumor surveillance methods in outbreaks: A systematic literature reviewHealth Promotion Perspectives10.34172/hpp.2021.0311:1(12-19)Online publication date: 7-Feb-2021
    • (2021)Rumour Detection Based on Graph Convolutional Neural NetIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2021.30505639(21686-21693)Online publication date: 2021
    • (2021)Rumour prevention in social networks with layer 2 blockchainsSocial Network Analysis and Mining10.1007/s13278-021-00819-y11:1Online publication date: 21-Oct-2021
    • (2020)An implicit crowdsourcing approach to rumor identification in online social networksProceedings of the 12th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining10.1109/ASONAM49781.2020.9381339(174-182)Online publication date: 7-Dec-2020
    • (2020)Socio-Technical Mitigation Effort to Combat Cyber Propaganda: A Systematic Literature MappingIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2020.29946588(92929-92944)Online publication date: 2020
    • (2019)Check-It: A plugin for Detecting and Reducing the Spread of Fake News and Misinformation on the WebIEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence10.1145/3350546.3352534(298-302)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2019
    • (2019)The Web of False InformationJournal of Data and Information Quality10.1145/330969911:3(1-37)Online publication date: 7-May-2019
    • (2019)Content-Aware Trust Propagation Toward Online Review Spam DetectionJournal of Data and Information Quality10.1145/330525811:3(1-31)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2019
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media