Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2742854.2742863acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Data access optimization in a processing-in-memory system

Published: 06 May 2015 Publication History

Abstract

The Active Memory Cube (AMC) system is a novel heterogeneous computing system concept designed to provide high performance and power-efficiency across a range of applications. The AMC architecture includes general-purpose host processors and specially designed in-memory processors (processing lanes) that would be integrated in a logic layer within 3D DRAM memory. The processing lanes have large vector register files but no power-hungry caches or local memory buffers. Performance depends on how well the resulting higher effective memory latency within the AMC can be managed. In this paper, we describe a combination of programming language features, compiler techniques, operating system interfaces, and hardware design that can effectively hide memory latency for the processing lanes in an AMC system. We present experimental data to show how this approach improves the performance of a set of representative benchmarks important in high performance computing applications. As a result, we are able to achieve high performance together with power efficiency using the AMC architecture.

References

[1]
P. Balaprakash, D. Buntinas, A. Chan, A. Guha, R. Gupta, S. H. K. Narayanan, A. A. Chien, P. Hovland, and B. Norris. Exascale workload characterization and architecture implications. In Proceedings of the High Performance Computing Symposium, pages 5:1--5:8, San Diego, CA, USA, 2013.
[2]
T. Chen, R. Raghavan, J. Dale, and E. Iwata. Cell broadband engine architecture and its first implementation-a performance view. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 51(5): 559--572, Sept 2007.
[3]
M. Chu, N. Jayasena, D. P. Zhang, and M. Ignatowski. High-level programming model abstractions for processing in memory. In 1st Workshop on Near-Data Processing in conjunction with the 46th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture, 2013.
[4]
W. Feng and K. Cameron. The Green500 List: Encouraging sustainable supercomputing. Computer, 40(12): 50--55, Dec 2007. http://www.green500.org.
[5]
A. Gara and R. Nair. Exascale computing: What future architectures will mean for the user community. In PARCO'09, pages 3--15, 2009.
[6]
R. Garg and L. Hendren. A portable and high-performance general matrix-multiply (GEMM) library for GPUs and single-chip CPU/GPU systems. In Proceedings of the 2014 22nd Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed, and Network-Based Processing, 2014.
[7]
C. Gregg and K. Hazelwood. Where is the data? Why you cannot debate CPU vs. GPU performance without the answer. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software, ISPASS '11, pages 134--144, Washington, DC, USA, 2011.
[8]
W. Gropp, E. Lusk, and A. Skjellum. Using MPI: Portable Parallel Programming with the Message-passing Interface. Number v. 1 in Scientific and engineering computation. MIT Press, 1999.
[9]
J. Jeffers and J. Reinders. Intel Xeon Phi Coprocessor High Performance Programming. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, 2013.
[10]
D. Kirk. NVIDIA CUDA software and GPU parallel computing architecture. In Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Memory Management, ISMM '07, pages 103--104, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
[11]
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Livermore Unstructured Lagrangian Explicit Shock Hydrodynamics (LULESH). https://codesign.llnl.gov/lulesh.php.
[12]
B. Li, H. Chang, S. Song, C. Su, T. Meyer, J. Mooring, and K. Cameron. The power-performance tradeoffs of the Intel Xeon Phi on HPC applications. In Proceedings of the Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops & PhD Forum, 2014.
[13]
G. Mitra, E. Stotzer, A. Jayaraj, and A. Rendell. Implementation and optimization of the OpenMP accelerator model for the TI Keystone II architecture. In L. DeRose, B. de Supinski, S. Olivier, B. Chapman, and M. Muller, editors, Using and Improving OpenMP for Devices, Tasks, and More, volume 8766 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 202--214. 2014.
[14]
R. Nair et al. Active Memory Cube: A Processing-in-memory Architecture for Exascale Systems. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 59(2/3), 2015.
[15]
OpenMP ARB. OpenMP application program interface version 4.0, May 2013.
[16]
D. Zhang, N. Jayasena, A. Lyashevsky, J. L. Greathouse, L. Xu, and M. Ignatowski. TOP-PIM: Throughput-oriented programmable processing in memory. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Symposium on High-performance Parallel and Distributed Computing, HPDC '14, pages 85--98, New York, NY, USA, 2014.
[17]
D. P. Zhang, N. Jayasena, A. Lyashevsky, J. Greathouse, M. Meswani, M. Nutter, and M. Ignatowski. A new perspective on processing-in-memory architecture design. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN Workshop on Memory Systems Performance and Correctness, MSPC '13, pages 7:1--7:3, New York, NY, USA, 2013.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Operand-Oriented Virtual Memory Support for Near-Memory ProcessingIEEE Transactions on Computers10.1109/TC.2023.324388172:8(2250-2263)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2023
  • (2023)Evaluating Machine LearningWorkloads on Memory-Centric Computing Systems2023 IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software (ISPASS)10.1109/ISPASS57527.2023.00013(35-49)Online publication date: Apr-2023
  • (2022)GIRAF: General Purpose In-Storage Resistive Associative FrameworkIEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems10.1109/TPDS.2021.306544833:2(276-287)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Data access optimization in a processing-in-memory system

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CF '15: Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers
    May 2015
    413 pages
    ISBN:9781450333580
    DOI:10.1145/2742854
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 06 May 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CF'15
    Sponsor:
    CF'15: Computing Frontiers Conference
    May 18 - 21, 2015
    Ischia, Italy

    Acceptance Rates

    CF '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 33 of 96 submissions, 34%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 273 of 785 submissions, 35%

    Upcoming Conference

    CF '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)51
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9
    Reflects downloads up to 26 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Operand-Oriented Virtual Memory Support for Near-Memory ProcessingIEEE Transactions on Computers10.1109/TC.2023.324388172:8(2250-2263)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2023
    • (2023)Evaluating Machine LearningWorkloads on Memory-Centric Computing Systems2023 IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software (ISPASS)10.1109/ISPASS57527.2023.00013(35-49)Online publication date: Apr-2023
    • (2022)GIRAF: General Purpose In-Storage Resistive Associative FrameworkIEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems10.1109/TPDS.2021.306544833:2(276-287)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2022
    • (2022)Machine Learning Training on a Real Processing-in-Memory System2022 IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium on VLSI (ISVLSI)10.1109/ISVLSI54635.2022.00064(292-295)Online publication date: Jul-2022
    • (2022)Exploiting Near-Data Processing to Accelerate Time Series Analysis2022 IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium on VLSI (ISVLSI)10.1109/ISVLSI54635.2022.00061(279-282)Online publication date: Jul-2022
    • (2022)DR-STRaNGe: End-to-End System Design for DRAM-based True Random Number Generators2022 IEEE International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA)10.1109/HPCA53966.2022.00087(1141-1155)Online publication date: Apr-2022
    • (2022)Benchmarking a New Paradigm: Experimental Analysis and Characterization of a Real Processing-in-Memory SystemIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2022.317410110(52565-52608)Online publication date: 2022
    • (2022)A Modern Primer on Processing in MemoryEmerging Computing: From Devices to Systems10.1007/978-981-16-7487-7_7(171-243)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2022
    • (2022)Emerging Memory Structures for VLSI CircuitsWiley Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering10.1002/047134608X.W8438(1-28)Online publication date: 12-May-2022
    • (2021)Power and Performance Evaluation of Memory-Intensive ApplicationsEnergies10.3390/en1414408914:14(4089)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2021
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media