Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2745555.2746645acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesw4aConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Understanding design considerations for adaptive user interfaces for accessible pointing with older and younger adults

Published: 18 May 2015 Publication History

Abstract

The Internet has become an important tool for many aspects of modern life. However, some individuals may experience challenges accessing the Internet if they have difficulty accurately controlling a pointing device. These pointing problems can vary in severity and frequency and may be caused by a motor impairment, limited hand dexterity, or fatigue. We believe that adaptive user interfaces (AUIs) offer a unique solution to detect and accommodate an individual's current pointing behavior. While past work has explored the implementation of detecting pointing challenges and designing adaptations, little has been done to understand how this population would like to interact with this software. In this paper, we present the results from participatory design sessions with older and younger adults that highlight their preferences for novel AUIs. We found diverse preferences and attitudes towards how AUIs notify a user of their current performance, and how they should adapt to pointing behavior. We present these diverse opinions as three personas that can be applied to future design of any AUI.

References

[1]
Ahlström, D., Hitz, M., and Leitner, G. 2006. An evaluation of sticky and force enhanced targets in multi target situations. In Proc. of NordiCHI. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 58--67.
[2]
Chaparro, A., Bohan, M., Fernandez, J., Choi, S. D., & Kattel, B. 1999. The impact of age on computer input device use: International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 24(5), 503--513.
[3]
Gajos, K. Z., Weld, D. S., & Wobbrock, J. O. 2010. Automatically generating personalized user interfaces with Supple. Artificial Intelligence, 174(12--13), 910--950.
[4]
Hanson, V. 2009. Age and web access: the next generation. In Proc. of W4A '09. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 7--15.
[5]
Heron, M., Hanson, V., and Ricketts, I. 2013. Accessibility Support for Older Adults with the ACCESS Framework. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29(11), 702--716.
[6]
Hourcade, J. P., & Berkel, T. R. 2008. Simple pen interaction performance of young and older adults using handheld computers. Interacting with Computers, 20(1), 166--183.
[7]
Hurst, A., Hudson, S. E., Mankoff, J., and Trewin, S. 2013. Distinguishing users by pointing performance in laboratory and real-world tasks. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 5, 2 (Oct. 2013), 5.
[8]
Hurst, A., Hudson, S. E., Mankoff, J., and Trewin, S. 2008. Automatically detecting pointing performance. In Proc. of IUI '08. ACM, New York, NY, 11--19.
[9]
Jamerson, 2008. A. Adaptive Interfaces and Agents. In A. Sears & J. A. Jacko (Eds.), The human-computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications (2nd ed.), 433--458. CRC Press.
[10]
Keates, S. and Trewin, S. 2005. Effect of age and Parkinson's disease on cursor positioning using a mouse. In Proc. of ASSETS '05. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 68--75.
[11]
Ketcham, C. and Stelmach, G., 2004. Movement Control in the Older Adult. In RW Pew & SB Van Hemel (Eds.), National Research Council (US) Steering Committee for the Workshop for Technology for Adaptive Aging, 64--92. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US).
[12]
Lavie. T. and Meyer. J. 2010. Benefits and costs of adaptive user interfaces. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 68, 8 (August 2010), 508--524.
[13]
Li, L., Gajos, K. Z. 2014. Adaptive click-and-cross: adapting to both abilities and task improves performance of users with impaired dexterity. In Proc. of IUI '14. ACM, New York, NY, 299--304.
[14]
McCrickard, D., Chewar, C. M. 2003. Attuning notification design to user goals and attention costs. Communications of the ACM 46, 3 (Mar. 2003), 67--72.
[15]
Moffatt, K. and McGrenere, J. 2009. Exploring Methods to Improve Pen-Based Menu Selection for Younger and Older Adults. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 2, 1, Article 3 (May 2009), 34 pages.
[16]
Pak, R., and McLaughlin, A. C. 2010. Designing displays for older adults. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
[17]
Rothrock, L., Koubek, R., Fuchs, F., Haas, M., and Salvendy, G. 2010. Review and reappraisal of adaptive interfaces: Toward biologically inspired paradigms. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science. 3, 1 (November 2010), 47--84.
[18]
Taveira, A. D., and Choi, S. D. 2009. Review Study of Computer Input Devices and Older Users. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 25(5), 455--474.
[19]
Trewin, S., Keates, S., and Moffatt, K. 2006. Developing steady clicks: a method of cursor assistance for people with motor impairments. In Proc. of ASSETS '06. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 26--33.
[20]
Sloan, D., Atkinson, MT., Machin, C., and Li, Y. 2010. The potential of adaptive interfaces as an accessibility aid for older web users. In Proc. of W4A '10. ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 35, 10 pages.
[21]
Wickremaratchi, M. M., & Llewelyn, J. G. 2006. Effects of ageing on touch. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 82(967), 301--4.
[22]
Wobbrock, J., Fogarty, F., Liu, S., Kimuro, S., and Harada, S. 2009. The angle mouse: target-agnostic dynamic gain adjustment based on angular deviation. In Proc. of CHI '09. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1401--1410.
[23]
Wobbrock, J., Kane, S., Gajos, K., Harada, S., and Froehlich, J. 2011. Ability-Based Design: Concept, Principles and Examples. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 3, 3, Article 9 (April 2011), 27 pages.
[24]
Worden, A., Walker, N., Bharat, K., Hudson, S. 1997. Making computers easier for older adults to use: area cursors and sticky icons. In Proc. CHI '97. ACM, New York, NY, 266--271.
[25]
Wood, E., Willoughby, T., Rushing, A., Bechtel, L., and Gilbert, J. 2005. Use of Computer Input Devices by Older Adults. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 24(5), 419--438.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Exploring the support needs of young adult caregivers, their issues, and preferences towards a web-based tool: a mixed-method studyBMC Digital Health10.1186/s44247-023-00057-62:1Online publication date: 9-Jan-2024
  • (2023)PAWS: Personalized Arm and Wrist Movements With Sensitivity Mappings for Controller-Free Locomotion in Virtual RealityProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36042647:MHCI(1-21)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2023
  • (2020)Using a participatory activities toolkit to elicit privacy expectations of adaptive assistive technologiesProceedings of the 17th International Web for All Conference10.1145/3371300.3383336(1-12)Online publication date: 20-Apr-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Understanding design considerations for adaptive user interfaces for accessible pointing with older and younger adults

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    W4A '15: Proceedings of the 12th International Web for All Conference
    May 2015
    214 pages
    ISBN:9781450333429
    DOI:10.1145/2745555
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 18 May 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. adaptive user interfaces
    2. assistive technology
    3. inclusion
    4. older adults
    5. pointing performance

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    W4A '15
    Sponsor:
    W4A '15: International Web for All Conference
    May 18 - 20, 2015
    Florence, Italy

    Acceptance Rates

    W4A '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 11 of 31 submissions, 35%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 171 of 371 submissions, 46%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)38
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7
    Reflects downloads up to 01 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Exploring the support needs of young adult caregivers, their issues, and preferences towards a web-based tool: a mixed-method studyBMC Digital Health10.1186/s44247-023-00057-62:1Online publication date: 9-Jan-2024
    • (2023)PAWS: Personalized Arm and Wrist Movements With Sensitivity Mappings for Controller-Free Locomotion in Virtual RealityProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36042647:MHCI(1-21)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2023
    • (2020)Using a participatory activities toolkit to elicit privacy expectations of adaptive assistive technologiesProceedings of the 17th International Web for All Conference10.1145/3371300.3383336(1-12)Online publication date: 20-Apr-2020
    • (2019)Perception and Adoption of Mobile Accessibility Features by Older Adults Experiencing Ability ChangesProceedings of the 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3308561.3353780(267-278)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2019
    • (2018)Who Should Have Access to my Pointing Data?Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3234695.3239331(203-216)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2018
    • (2018)Designing an Adaptive Web Navigation Interface for Users with Variable Pointing PerformanceProceedings of the 15th International Web for All Conference10.1145/3192714.3192818(1-10)Online publication date: 23-Apr-2018
    • (2016)"Tell It Like It Really Is"Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/2858036.2858379(5529-5542)Online publication date: 7-May-2016

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media