Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2786567.2793695acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Towards Mobile Blended Interaction Fostering Critical Thinking

Published: 24 August 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Critical thinking is a fundamental skill that all citizens should have. Unfortunately, while beliefs in unfounded claims are pervasive, teaching critical skill is a strenuous task. Digital mobile interaction could potentially support face-to-face teaching to foster critical thinking skills. In this paper, we present a preliminary version of the BaloneyMeter, a mobile app that provides support for teaching critical thinking skills. We report on a case study in a class of 150 students and present an open research question that we plan to address in subsequent work.

Supplementary Material

holzer (p735-holzer-suppl.zip)
Supplemental movie and image files for, Towards Mobile Blended Interaction Fostering Critical Thinking

References

[1]
Aarnio, K., and Lindeman, M. Paranormal beliefs, education, and thinking styles. Personality and Individual Differences 39, 7 (2005), 1227--1236.
[2]
Barr, N., Pennycook, G., Stolz, J. A., and Fugelsang, J. A. The brain in your pocket: Evidence that smartphones are used to supplant thinking. Computers in Human Behavior 48 (2015), 473--480.
[3]
Bouvet, R., Djeriouat, H., Goutaudier, N., Py, J., and Chabrol, H. Validation française de la revised paranormal belief scale. L'Encéphale 40, 4 (2014), 308--314.
[4]
Brotherton, R., and Eser, S. Bored to fears: Boredom proneness, paranoia, and conspiracy theories. Personality and Individual Differences 80 (2015), 1--5.
[5]
Brotherton, R., and French, C. C. Belief in conspiracy theories and susceptibility to the conjunction fallacy. Applied Cognitive Psychology 28, 2 (2014), 238--248.
[6]
Darwin, H., Neave, N., and Holmes, J. Belief in conspiracy theories. the role of paranormal belief, paranoid ideation and schizotypy. Personality and Individual Differences 50, 8 (2011), 1289--1293.
[7]
Gantz, J., and Reinsel, D. Extracting value from chaos. IDC iview, 1142 (2011), 9--10.
[8]
Garrett, R. K. Troubling consequences of online political rumoring. Human Communication Research 37, 2 (2011), 255--274.
[9]
Kane, M. J., Core, T. J., and Hunt, R. R. Bias versus bias: Harnessing hindsight to reveal paranormal belief change beyond demand characteristics. Psychonomic bulletin & review 17, 2 (2010), 206--212.
[10]
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., and Cook, J. Misinformation and its correction continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 13, 3 (2012), 106--131.
[11]
Mccaffree, K., and Saide, A. Why is critical thinking so hard to teach? In Skeptic Magazine, vol. 19 (2014), 54--57.
[12]
Miller, R. L., and Wozniak, W. Counter-attitudinal advocacy: Effort vs. self-generation of arguments. Current Research in Social Psychology 6, 4 (2001), 46--57.
[13]
Mirowsky, J., and Ross, C. E. Paranoia and the structure of powerlessness. American Sociological Review (1983), 228--239.
[14]
Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Seli, P., Koehler, D. J., and Fugelsang, J. A. Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief. Cognition 123, 3 (2012), 335--346.
[15]
Sagan, C. The fine art of baloney detection. Paranormal Claims: A Critical Analysis (2007), 1.
[16]
Sagan, C. Demon-haunted world: science as a candle in the dark. Ballantine Books, 2011.
[17]
Shermer, M. Baloney detection. Scientific American 285, 5 (2001), 36.
[18]
Shtulman, A. Epistemic similarities between students' scientific and supernatural beliefs. Journal of Educational Psychology 105, 1 (2013), 199.
[19]
Stempel, C., Hargrove, T., and Stempel, G. H. Media use, social structure, and belief in 9/11 conspiracy theories. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 84, 2 (2007), 353--372.
[20]
Svanaes, D., and Verplank, W. In search of metaphors for tangible user intefaces. In Proceedings of DARE 2000 on Designing augmented reality environments, ACM (2000), 121--129.
[21]
Tennent, P., Reeves, S., Benford, S., Walker, B., Marshall, J., Brundell, P., Meese, R., and Harter, P. The machine in the ghost: augmenting broadcasting with biodata. In CHI'12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2012), 91--100.
[22]
Tobacyk, J. J. A revised paranormal belief scale. The International Journal of Transpersonal Studies 23, 23 (2004), 94--98.
[23]
Tsai, C.-Y., Lin, C.-N., Shih, W.-L., and Wu, P.-L. The effect of online argumentation upon students' pseudoscientific beliefs. Computers & Education 80 (2015), 187--197.
[24]
Willingham, D. T. Critical thinking: Why is it so hard to teach? Arts Education Policy Review 109, 4 (2008), 21--32.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)AI Should Challenge, Not ObeyCommunications of the ACM10.1145/3649404Online publication date: 18-Sep-2024
  • (2020)Motivated numeracy and active reasoning in a Western European sampleBehavioural Public Policy10.1017/bpp.2020.32(1-23)Online publication date: 5-Aug-2020
  • (2018)Digitally Scaffolding Debate in the ClassroomExtended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3170427.3188499(1-6)Online publication date: 20-Apr-2018

Index Terms

  1. Towards Mobile Blended Interaction Fostering Critical Thinking

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    MobileHCI '15: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct
    August 2015
    697 pages
    ISBN:9781450336536
    DOI:10.1145/2786567
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 24 August 2015

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Baloney detection kit
    2. Blended learning
    3. Critical thinking
    4. HCI
    5. Paranormal beliefs

    Qualifiers

    • Poster
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    MobileHCI '15
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 202 of 906 submissions, 22%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)AI Should Challenge, Not ObeyCommunications of the ACM10.1145/3649404Online publication date: 18-Sep-2024
    • (2020)Motivated numeracy and active reasoning in a Western European sampleBehavioural Public Policy10.1017/bpp.2020.32(1-23)Online publication date: 5-Aug-2020
    • (2018)Digitally Scaffolding Debate in the ClassroomExtended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3170427.3188499(1-6)Online publication date: 20-Apr-2018

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media