Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2808435.2808463acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschitalyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Designing and evaluating interfaces for domestic eco-feedback: a blended educational experience

Published: 28 September 2015 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    In this work we describe an educational experience focused on the design of eco-feedback interfaces for improving the environmental awareness and optimizing the energy consumption in domestic contexts. The experience was held during the HCI course for the Laurea degree in Computer Science of the Università Ca' Foscari Venezia and involved about 80 undergraduate students that worked on 20 independent projects. All the projects were focused on the same conceptual design goal: proposing an ecosystem of interfaces for a family of four components (mother, father and two children aged between 6 and 11), capable of monitoring energy consumption and production of a photovoltaic plant and making different types of comparison, even with neighbors and selected members of social networks. The result of the students' work was evaluated by adults (i.e., researchers and peers) but also by a class of children of the Primary School. The interest of this educational experience is threefold. On one side the study has permitted to focus on the themes of environmental awareness and has led to define interesting conceptual projects that go beyond the commercially available eco-feedback solutions. Then the study has been an occasion for reflecting about methods and goals of an HCI course for undergraduate students, originating a design experience that will be further refined in the next editions of the course. Finally the experience has been an interesting occasion for testing the points of strength and weakness of tools for remote learning. This has led to identify some possible solutions supporting design thinking in a remote or blended educational context, which should foster the shift from simple project sharing to true collaborative design.

    References

    [1]
    ACM Digital Library. http://www.acm.org/dl.
    [2]
    M. Barreto, E. Karapanos, and N. Nunes. Why don't families get along with eco-feedback technologies?: A longitudinal inquiry. In Proc. of CHItaly '13, pages 16:1--16:4, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM.
    [3]
    Y. Chisik. An image of electricity: Towards an understanding of how people perceive electricity. In Proc. of INTERACT'11, pages 100--117, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011. Springer-Verlag.
    [4]
    S. Darby. Making it obvious: Designing feedback into energy consumption. In P. Bertoldi, A. Ricci, and A. de Almeida, editors, Energy Efficiency in Household Appliances and Lighting, pages 685--696. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2001.
    [5]
    P. A. Ertmer and T. J. Newby. Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance improvement quarterly, 6(4):50--72, 1993.
    [6]
    J. Froehlich, L. Findlater, and J. Landay. The design of eco-feedback technology. In Proc. of CHI '10, pages 1999--2008, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
    [7]
    Google SketchUp. http://www.sketchup.com.
    [8]
    S. Greenberg, S. Carpendale, N. Marquardt, and B. Buxton. Sketching User Experiences: The Workbook. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, 1st edition, 2011.
    [9]
    A. Gustafsson and M. Gyllenswärd. The power-aware cord: Energy awareness through ambient information display. In CHI '05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA '05, pages 1423--1426, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM.
    [10]
    T. Hargreaves, M. Nye, and J. Burgess. Making energy visible: A qualitative field study of how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors. Energy Policy, 38(10):6111--6119, 2010.
    [11]
    F. Heller and J. Borchers. Physical prototyping of an on-outlet power-consumption display. interactions, 19(1):14--17, Jan. 2012.
    [12]
    T. G. Holmes. Eco-visualization: Combining art and technology to reduce energy consumption. In Proc. of C&C '07, pages 153--162, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
    [13]
    Hunter Research and Technology. GreenMeter. http://hunter.pairsite.com/greenmeter/.
    [14]
    Invision. http://invisionapp.com.
    [15]
    B. Lawson. How designers think: the design process demystified. Routledge, 2006.
    [16]
    L. McCalley and C. Midden. Computer based systems in household appliances: The study of eco-feedback as a tool for increasing conservation behavior. In Proc. of APCHI '98, pages 344--, Washington, DC, USA, 1998. IEEE Computer Society.
    [17]
    A. V. Moere, M. Tomitsch, M. Hoinkis, E. Trefz, S. Johansen, and A. Jones. Comparative feedback in the street: Exposing residential energy consumption on house facades. In Proc. of INTERACT'11, pages 470--488, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011. Springer-Verlag.
    [18]
    Moodle. https://moodle.org.
    [19]
    V. Nisi, D. Nicoletti, R. Nisi, and N. J. Nunes. Beyond eco-feedback: using art and emotional attachment to express energy consumption. In Proc. of C&C '11, pages 381--382, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.
    [20]
    V. Nisi, N. J. Nunes, F. Quintal, and M. Barreto. Sinais from fanal: Design and evaluation of an art-inspired eco-feedback system. In Proc. of CHItaly '13, pages 3:1--3:10, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM.
    [21]
    H. L. O'Brien and E. G. Toms. The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 61(1):50--69, Jan. 2010.
    [22]
    J. Pierce, W. Odom, and E. Blevis. Energy aware dwelling: a critical survey of interaction design for eco-visualizations. In Proc. of OZCHI '08, pages 1--8, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM.
    [23]
    F. Quintal, L. Pereira, N. J. Nunes, and V. Nisi. What-a-watt : Where does my electricity comes from? In Adjunct Proc. of AVI'14, Como, Italy, 2014.
    [24]
    A. Spagnolli, N. Corradi, L. Gamberini, E. Hoggan, G. Jacucci, C. Katzeff, L. Broms, and L. Jonsson. Eco-feedback on the go: Motivating energy awareness. Computer, 44(5):38--45, May 2011.
    [25]
    V. Sundramoorthy, Q. Liu, G. Cooper, N. Linge, and J. Cooper. Dehems: A user-driven domestic energy monitoring system. In Internet of Things (IOT), 2010, pages 1--8, Nov 2010.
    [26]
    United Nations Environmental. UNEP Carbon Calculator Application. http://www.kodehuset.no/apps/.

    Cited By

    View all

    Index Terms

    1. Designing and evaluating interfaces for domestic eco-feedback: a blended educational experience

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Information & Contributors

          Information

          Published In

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          CHItaly '15: Proceedings of the 11th Biannual Conference of the Italian SIGCHI Chapter
          September 2015
          195 pages
          ISBN:9781450336840
          DOI:10.1145/2808435
          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          In-Cooperation

          • Sapienza: Sapienza University of Rome

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          Published: 28 September 2015

          Permissions

          Request permissions for this article.

          Check for updates

          Author Tags

          1. HCI teaching
          2. adaptive interfaces
          3. design thinking
          4. eco-feedback
          5. education
          6. environmental awareness
          7. evaluation
          8. interfaces for children
          9. prototyping tools
          10. remote learning
          11. ubiquitous computing

          Qualifiers

          • Research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Conference

          CHItaly 2015

          Acceptance Rates

          CHItaly '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 31 of 59 submissions, 53%;
          Overall Acceptance Rate 109 of 242 submissions, 45%

          Contributors

          Other Metrics

          Bibliometrics & Citations

          Bibliometrics

          Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)18
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
          Reflects downloads up to 10 Aug 2024

          Other Metrics

          Citations

          Cited By

          View all

          View Options

          Get Access

          Login options

          View options

          PDF

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          Media

          Figures

          Other

          Tables

          Share

          Share

          Share this Publication link

          Share on social media