Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2808492.2808562acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicimcsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A fine-grain nonlocal weighted average method for image CS reconstruction

Published: 19 August 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Compressive sensing can acquire a signal at a sampling rate far below the Nyquist sampling rate if signal is sparse in some domain. However, signal reconstruction from its observations is challenging because it is an implicit ill-pose problem in practice. As classical CS reconstruction methods, total variation (TV) and iteratively reweighted TV (ReTV) methods only exploit local image information, which results in some loss of image structures and causes blocking effect. In this paper, we observe there are abundant nonlocal repetitive structures in nature image, so we propose a novel fine-grain nonlocal weighted average method for nature image CS reconstruction, and we take full use of the nonlocal repetitive structures to recover image from the observations. Besides, an efficient iterative bound optimization algorithm which is stably convergent in our experiments is applied to the above CS reconstruction. The experimental results of different nature images demonstrate that our proposed algorithm can outperform the existing classical nature image CS reconstruction algorithms in Peak-Signal-Noise-Ratio (PSNR) and subjective evaluation.

References

[1]
Y. Tsaig, D. L. Donoho. 2006. Extensions of compressed sensing. J. Signal Processing. 86, 3 (Mar. 2006), 533--548. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2005.05.029.
[2]
E. J. Candes, J. Romberg, and T. Tao. 2006. Exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information. J. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. 52, 2 (Feb. 2006), 489--509.
[3]
E. J. Candes and T. Tao. 2006. Near-optimal signal recovery from random projections: universal encoding strategies?. J. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. 52, 12 (Dec. 2006), 5406--5425. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tit.2006.885507.
[4]
K. Egiazarian, A. Tbi and H. Katkovnik. 2007. Compressed sensing image reconstruction via recursive spatially adaptive filtering. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conferrence on Image Processing (ICIP 2007). San Antonio, TX, USA, 549--552. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icip.2007.4379013.
[5]
Xue Bi, Xiang-dong Chen, Yu Zhang, Bin Liu. 2011. Image compressed sensing based on wavelet transform in contourlet domain. J. Signal Processing. 91, 5 (May 2011), 1085--1092. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2010.10.006.
[6]
Waheed Bajwa, Jarvis Haupt, Akbar M. 2010. Compressed Channel Sensing: A New Approach to Estimating Sparse Multipath Channels. In Proceedings of the IEEE. 98, 6 (Jun. 2010), 1058--1076. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/jproc.2010.2042415.
[7]
Z. Tian, X. Jia, K. Yuan, T. Pan, and S. B. Jiang. 2011. Low-dose CT reconstruction via edge-preserving total variation regularization. J. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 56, 18 (Sept.2011), 5949--5967. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/56/18/011.
[8]
Xuan Fei, Zhihui Wei, and Liang Xiao. 2013. Iterative Directional Total Variation Refinement for Compressive Sensing Image Reconstruction. J. IEEE Signal Process Letters. 20, 11 (Nov. 2013), 1070--1073. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/lsp.2013.2280571.
[9]
E. J. Candes, M. B. Wakin, and S. P. Boyd. 2008. Enhancing sparsity by reweighted l1 minimization. J. Fourier Analysis and Applications. 14, 5--6 (Dec. 2008), 877--905. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00041-008-9045-x.
[10]
A. Buades, B. Coll and J. M. Morel. 2005. A non-local algorithm for image denoising. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2005). San Diego, CA, 60--65. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2005.38.
[11]
J. Mairal, F. Bach, J. Ponce, G. Sapiro, and A. Zisserman. 2009. Non-local sparse models for image restoration. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV 2009). Kyoto, Japan, 2272--2279. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iccv.2009.5459452.
[12]
K. Dabov, A. Foi, V. Katkovnik, and K. Egiazarian. 2007. Image denoising by sparse 3D transform-domain collaborative filtering. J. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 16, 8 (Aug. 2007), 2080--2095. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tip.2007.901238.
[13]
D. L. Donoho. 2006. Compressed sensing. J. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. 52, 4 (Apr. 2006), 1289--1206.
[14]
X. Zhang, M. Burger, X. Bresson, and S. Osher. 2010. Bregmanized nonlocal regularization for deconvolution and sparse reconstruction. J. SIAM Journal Imaging Sciences. 3, 3 (2010), 253--276. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/090746379.
[15]
I. Daubechies, M. Defriese, and C. D. Mol. 2004. An iterative thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems with a sparsity constraint. J. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics. 57, 11 (Nov. 2004), 1413--1457. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpa.20042.
[16]
Xue Bi, Xiangdong Chen. 2014. NSCT-NLmeans based CS reconstruction for noisy image. In Proceedings of the 7th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing (2014). Dalian, China, 174--178. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/cisp.2014.7003772.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ICIMCS '15: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Internet Multimedia Computing and Service
August 2015
397 pages
ISBN:9781450335287
DOI:10.1145/2808492
  • General Chairs:
  • Ramesh Jain,
  • Shuqiang Jiang,
  • Program Chairs:
  • John Smith,
  • Jitao Sang,
  • Guohui Li
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 19 August 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. CS reconstruction
  2. compressive sensing
  3. iterative algorithm
  4. nonlocal repetitive

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

ICIMCS '15

Acceptance Rates

ICIMCS '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 20 of 128 submissions, 16%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 163 of 456 submissions, 36%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 44
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 28 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media