Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2814189.2815369acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessplashConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Contributions of the under-appreciated: gender bias in an open-source ecology

Published: 25 October 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Female software developers account for only a small portion of the total developer community. This inequality is caused by subtle beliefs and sometimes interactions between different genders and society, referred to as implicit biases and explicit behavior, respectively. In this study, I mined user contribution acceptance from a popular software collaboration service. The contributions of female developers were accepted into open-source projects with roughly equivalent success to those of males, partially discounting recent findings that explicit behavior accompanies implicit gender bias, while bolstering the claim that implicit bias is cultural, rather than as a result of innate differences.

References

[1]
P. E. Black. 2012. Static Analyzers: Seat Belts for Your Code. IEEE Security&Privacy Magazine 10, 3 (2012), 48––52.
[2]
JL Cundiff, TK Vescio, E. Loken, and L. Lo. 2013. Do Genderscience Stereotypes Predict Science Identification and Science Career Aspirations among Undergraduate Science Majors? SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY OF EDUCATION 16, 4 (2013), 541– 554.
[3]
Abdallah M. Elamin and Katlin Omair. 2010. Males’ Attitudes towards Working Females in Saudi Arabia. Personnel review 39, 6 (2010), 746–766.
[4]
National Science Foundation. 2013. Highlights on Women, Minorities and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering. NewsRx Health & Science (Mar 31 2013), 97. Copyright - Copyright 2013, NewsRx Health & Science via NewsRx.com;& Science via NewsRx.com; Last updated - 2013-03-21.
[5]
Kazi A S M Nurul Huda. 2015. Ethics of Reducing Inequality: Some Points. Journal of Arts and Humanities 4, 5 (2015), 34.
[6]
Sarah M. Jackson, Amy L. Hillard, and Tamera R. Schneider. 2014.
[7]
Using Implicit Bias Training to Improve Attitudes Toward Women in STEM. Social Psychology of Education 17, 3 (2014), 419–438.
[8]
Jane C. Prey and Alfred C. (. Weaver. 2013. Fostering Gender Diversity in Computing. Computer 46, 3 (2013), 22–23.
[9]
L. Sax, K. Lehman, A. Kanny, G. Lim, L. Paulson, H. Zimmerman, and J. Jacobs. 2015. Anatomy of an Enduring Gender Gap: The Evolution of Women’s Participation in Computer Science. In Proceedings of the 2015 American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting (2015).
[10]
Bogdan Vasilescu, Andrea Capiluppi, and Alexander Serebrenik. 2014. Gender, Representation and Online Participation: A Quantitative Study. Interacting with Computers 26, 5 (2014), 488–511.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)How Much Do Women Build Open Source Infrastructure?Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Software Engineering10.1007/978-1-4842-9651-6_14(231-253)Online publication date: 21-Sep-2024
  • (2023)Gender Representation Among Contributors to Open-Source Infrastructure : An Analysis of 20 Package Manager Ecosystems2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society (ICSE-SEIS)10.1109/ICSE-SEIS58686.2023.00025(180-187)Online publication date: May-2023
  • (2023)The Distribution and Disengagement of Women Contributors in Open-Source: 2008–20212023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion)10.1109/ICSE-Companion58688.2023.00082(305-307)Online publication date: May-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Contributions of the under-appreciated: gender bias in an open-source ecology

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SPLASH Companion 2015: Companion Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Systems, Programming, Languages and Applications: Software for Humanity
    October 2015
    112 pages
    ISBN:9781450337229
    DOI:10.1145/2814189
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 25 October 2015

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. gender bias
    2. implicit bias
    3. open source
    4. software

    Qualifiers

    • Abstract

    Conference

    SPLASH '15
    Sponsor:

    Upcoming Conference

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 04 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)How Much Do Women Build Open Source Infrastructure?Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Software Engineering10.1007/978-1-4842-9651-6_14(231-253)Online publication date: 21-Sep-2024
    • (2023)Gender Representation Among Contributors to Open-Source Infrastructure : An Analysis of 20 Package Manager Ecosystems2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society (ICSE-SEIS)10.1109/ICSE-SEIS58686.2023.00025(180-187)Online publication date: May-2023
    • (2023)The Distribution and Disengagement of Women Contributors in Open-Source: 2008–20212023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion)10.1109/ICSE-Companion58688.2023.00082(305-307)Online publication date: May-2023
    • (2022)Women’s Participation in Open Source Software: A Survey of the LiteratureACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology10.1145/351046031:4(1-37)Online publication date: 22-Aug-2022
    • (2022)Perceptions of the state of D&I and D&I initiative in the ASFProceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society10.1145/3510458.3513008(130-142)Online publication date: 21-May-2022
    • (2022)Perceptions of the State of D&I and D&I Initiative in the ASF2022 IEEE/ACM 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society (ICSE-SEIS)10.1109/ICSE-SEIS55304.2022.9794024(130-142)Online publication date: May-2022
    • (2019)FLOSS participants' perceptions about gender and inclusivenessProceedings of the 41st International Conference on Software Engineering10.1109/ICSE.2019.00077(677-687)Online publication date: 25-May-2019
    • (2018)Diversity and decorum in open source communitiesProceedings of the 2018 26th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering10.1145/3236024.3275441(986-987)Online publication date: 26-Oct-2018
    • (2017)Curating GitHub for engineered software projectsEmpirical Software Engineering10.1007/s10664-017-9512-622:6(3219-3253)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2017
    • (2017)Designing for Digital Inclusion: A Post-Hoc Evaluation of a Civic TechnologySocial Informatics10.1007/978-3-319-67217-5_34(572-588)Online publication date: 3-Sep-2017

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media