Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article
Free access

Label Cover Instances with Large Girth and the Hardness of Approximating Basic k-Spanner

Published: 31 December 2015 Publication History

Abstract

We study the well-known Label Cover problem under the additional requirement that problem instances have large girth. We show that if the girth is some k, the problem is roughly 2log 1-ϵ n)/k hard to approximate for all constant ϵ > 0. A similar theorem was claimed by Elkin and Peleg [2000] as part of an attempt to prove hardness for the basic k-spanner problem, but their proof was later found to have a fundamental error. Thus, we give both the first nontrivial lower bound for the problem of Label Cover with large girth as well as the first full proof of strong hardness for the basic k-spanner problem, which is both the simplest problem in graph spanners and one of the few for which super-logarithmic hardness was not known. Assuming NPBPTIME(2polylog(n), we show (roughly) that for every k ⩾ 3 and every constant ϵ > 0, it is hard to approximate the basic k-spanner problem within a factor better than 2log 1-ϵ n)/k. This improves over the previous best lower bound of only Ω(log n)/k from Kortsarz [2001]. Our main technique is subsampling the edges of 2-query probabilistically checkable proofs (PCPs), which allows us to reduce the degree of a PCP to be essentially equal to the soundness desired. This turns out to be enough to basically guarantee large girth.

References

[1]
Ingo Althöfer, Gautam Das, David Dobkin, Deborah Joseph, and José Soares. 1993. On sparse spanners of weighted graphs. Discrete and Computational Geometry 9, 1, 81--100.
[2]
Sanjeev Arora and Carsten Lund. 1997. Hardness of approximations. In Approximation Algorithms for NP-Hard Problems, D. Hochbaum (Ed.). PWS Publishing, Boston, MA, 399--446.
[3]
Sanjeev Arora, Carsten Lund, Rajeev Motwani, Madhu Sudan, and Mario Szegedy. 1998. Proof verification and the hardness of approximation problems. Journal of the ACM 45, 3, 501--555.
[4]
Sanjeev Arora and Shmuel Safra. 1998. Probabilistic checking of proofs: A new characterization of NP. Journal of the ACM 45, 1, 70--122.
[5]
Baruch Awerbuch, Alan Baratz, and David Peleg. 1992. Efficient Broadcast and Light Weight Spanners. Technical Report CS92-22. Weizman Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
[6]
Hans-Jrgen Bandelt and Andreas Dress. 1986. Reconstructing the shape of a tree from observed dissimilarity data. Advances in Applied Mathematics 7, 3, 309--343.
[7]
Surender Baswana and Sandeep Sen. 2006. Approximate distance oracles for unweighted graphs in expected O(n2) time. ACM Transactions on Algorithms 2, 4, 557--577.
[8]
Piotr Berman, Arnab Bhattacharyya, Konstantin Makarychev, Sofya Raskhodnikova, and Grigory Yaroslavtsev. 2013. Approximation algorithms for spanner problems and directed Steiner forest. Information and Computation 222, 93--107.
[9]
Arnab Bhattacharyya, Elena Grigorescu, Kyomin Jung, Sofya Raskhodnikova, and David P. Woodruff. 2009. Transitive-closure spanners. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA’09). 932--941.
[10]
Chandra Chekuri, Mohammad Taghi Hajiaghayi, Guy Kortsarz, and Mohammad R. Salavatipour. 2010. Approximation algorithms for nonuniform buy-at-bulk network design. SIAM Journal on Computing 39, 5, 1772--1798.
[11]
Edith Cohen. 1999. Fast algorithms for constructing t-spanners and paths with stretch t. SIAM Journal on Computing 28, 1, 210--236.
[12]
Edith Cohen. 2000. Polylog-time and near-linear work approximation scheme for undirected shortest paths. Journal of the ACM 47, 1, 132--166.
[13]
Lenore Cowen. 2001. Compact routing with minimum stretch. Journal of Algorithms 38, 1, 170--183.
[14]
Lenore Cowen and Christopher G. Wagner. 2004. Compact roundtrip routing in directed networks. Journal of Algorithms 50, 1, 79--95.
[15]
Michael Dinitz and Robert Krauthgamer. 2011a. Directed spanners via flow-based linear programs. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC’11). ACM, New York, NY, 323--332.
[16]
Michael Dinitz and Robert Krauthgamer. 2011b. Fault-tolerant spanners: Better and simpler. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC’11). ACM, New York, NY, 169--178.
[17]
Devdatt Dubhashi and Alessandro Panconesi. 2009. Concentration of Measure for the Analysis of Randomized Algorithms. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
[18]
Michael Elkin. 2005. Computing almost shortest paths. ACM Transactions on Algorithms 1, 2, 283--323.
[19]
Michael Elkin and David Peleg. 2000. Strong inapproximability of the basic k-spanner problem. In Proceedings of the 27th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP’00). 636--647.
[20]
Michael Elkin and David Peleg. 2005. Approximating k-spanner problems for k > 2. Theoretical Computer Science 337, 1--3, 249--277.
[21]
Michael Elkin and David Peleg. 2007. The hardness of approximating spanner problems. Theory of Computing Systems 41, 4, 691--729.
[22]
Uriel Feige. 1998. A threshold of ln n for approximating set cover. Journal of the ACM 45, 4, 634--652.
[23]
Uriel Feige and Joe Kilian. 1998. Zero knowledge and the chromatic number. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 57, 2, 187--199.
[24]
Joan Feigenbaum, Sampath Kannan, Andrew McGregor, Siddharth Suri, and Jian Zhang. 2008. Graph distances in the data-stream model. SIAM Journal on Computing 38, 5, 1709--1727.
[25]
Oded Goldreich and Madhu Sudan. 2006. Locally testable codes and PCPs of almost-linear length. Journal of the ACM 53, 4, 558--655.
[26]
Johan Håstad. 2001. Some optimal inapproximability results. Journal of the ACM 48, 4, 798--859.
[27]
Subhash Khot. 2005. On the unique games conjecture. In Proceedings of the 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’05). Los Alamitos, CA, 3.
[28]
Guy Kortsarz. 2001. On the hardness of approximating spanners. Algorithmica 30, 3, 432--450.
[29]
Guy Kortsarz and David Peleg. 1994. Generating sparse 2-spanners. Journal of Algorithms 17, 2, 222--236.
[30]
Bundit Laekhanukit. 2014. Parameters of two-prover-one-round game and the hardness of connectivity problems. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA’14). 1626--1643. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2634074.2634192.
[31]
Christos Levcopoulos and Andrzej Lingas. 1992. There are planar graphs almost as good as the complete graphs and almost as cheap as minimum spanning trees. Algorithmica 8, 3, 251--256.
[32]
Carsten Lund and Mihalis Yannakakis. 1994. On the hardness of approximating minimization problems. Journal of the ACM 41, 5, 960--981.
[33]
David Peleg and Alejandro Schaffer. 1989. Graph spanners. Journal of Graph Theory 13, 99--116.
[34]
David Peleg and Jeffrey D. Ullman. 1989. An optimal synchronizer for the hypercube. SIAM Journal on Computing 18, 4, 740--747.
[35]
David Peleg and Eli Upfal. 1989. A trade-off between space and efficiency for routing tables. Journal of the ACM 36, 3, 510--530.
[36]
Sofya Raskhodnikova. 2010. Transitive-closure spanners: A survey. In Property Testing, O. Goldreich (Ed.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 167--196. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1986603.1986615.
[37]
Ran Raz. 1998. A parallel repetition theorem. SIAM Journal on Computing 27, 3, 763--803.
[38]
Iam Roditty, Mikkel Thorup, and Uri Zwick. 2008. Roundtrip spanners and roundtrip routing in directed graphs. ACM Transactions on Algorithms 4, 3, Article No. 29.
[39]
Mikkel Thorup and Uri Zwick. 2001. Compact routing schemes. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual ACM Symposium on Parallel Algorithms and Architectures (SPAA’01). ACM, New York, NY, 1--10.
[40]
Mikkel Thorup and Uri Zwick. 2005. Approximate distance oracles. Journal of the ACM 52, 1, 1--24.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Hop-Constrained Metric Embeddings and their Applications2021 IEEE 62nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)10.1109/FOCS52979.2021.00056(492-503)Online publication date: Feb-2022
  • (2021)Distributed Spanner ApproximationSIAM Journal on Computing10.1137/20M131263050:3(1103-1147)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2021
  • (2021)Lasserre Integrality Gaps for Graph Spanners and Related ProblemsApproximation and Online Algorithms10.1007/978-3-030-80879-2_7(97-112)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Algorithms
ACM Transactions on Algorithms  Volume 12, Issue 2
February 2016
385 pages
ISSN:1549-6325
EISSN:1549-6333
DOI:10.1145/2846106
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 31 December 2015
Accepted: 01 August 2015
Received: 01 March 2013
Published in TALG Volume 12, Issue 2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Graph spanners
  2. probabilistically checkable proofs

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)86
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)33
Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Hop-Constrained Metric Embeddings and their Applications2021 IEEE 62nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)10.1109/FOCS52979.2021.00056(492-503)Online publication date: Feb-2022
  • (2021)Distributed Spanner ApproximationSIAM Journal on Computing10.1137/20M131263050:3(1103-1147)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2021
  • (2021)Lasserre Integrality Gaps for Graph Spanners and Related ProblemsApproximation and Online Algorithms10.1007/978-3-030-80879-2_7(97-112)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2021
  • (2020)Graph spanners: A tutorial reviewComputer Science Review10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.10025337(100253)Online publication date: Aug-2020
  • (2019)On the approximability and hardness of the minimum connected dominating set with routing cost constraintTheoretical Computer Science10.1016/j.tcs.2019.06.019793:C(140-151)Online publication date: 12-Nov-2019
  • (2019)Graph Simplification for Infrastructure Network DesignCombinatorial Optimization and Applications10.1007/978-3-030-36412-0_47(576-589)Online publication date: 23-Nov-2019
  • (2019)On the Approximability and Hardness of the Minimum Connected Dominating Set with Routing Cost ConstraintComputer-Based Analysis of the Stochastic Stability of Mechanical Structures Driven by White and Colored Noise10.1007/978-3-030-14094-6_3(32-46)Online publication date: 15-Feb-2019
  • (2018)Distributed Spanner ApproximationProceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing10.1145/3212734.3212758(139-148)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2018
  • (2017)Approximating spanners and directed steiner forestProceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms10.5555/3039686.3039720(534-553)Online publication date: 16-Jan-2017

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media