Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2832932.2837013acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesesemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Smelling, pulling, and looking: unpacking similarities and differences in dog and human city life

Published: 16 November 2015 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    The problem of understanding animals, e.g., what they want and what they are doing, are recurrent matters for the emerging field of animal-computer interaction (ACI). We focus on animals in the city by bridging the field with urban studies and open up for new design opportunities in terms of the possibilities of new digital technology to reconfigure animal city life. We present an ethnomethodological video analysis of the negotiations and interactional work between two leashed pugs and a handler walking down a street. We unpack similarities and differences between the two species in terms of their interests and intentions in an urban environment through detailed examination of the moments in the walk when the leash is pulled taut. We show how a strained leash can result from a conflict between the dog's attentiveness towards other dogs by smelling and looking, and the human's urge to move along. We propose design directions supporting the dogs' wants and needs by accessing the handler with information on the dogs' curiosities in other dogs by visualizing the invisible scent-universe of the dogs and encourage dog-dog interaction.

    References

    [1]
    Beatley, T. & Bekoff, M. (2013). City Planning and Animals: Expanding Our Urban Compassion Footprint. In: Ethics, Design and Planning of the Built Environment, Vol. 12, 185--195.
    [2]
    Braun, B., (2005). Evironmental Issues: Writing a More-Than-Human Urban Geography. In: Progress In Human Geography, 29(5), 635--650.
    [3]
    Brewster, S., McGookin, D., and Miller, C. (2006). Olfoto: Designing a Smell-Based Interaction. In: Proc. of CHI '06 (ACM), 653--662.
    [4]
    Buller, H., 2014. Animal Geographies I. In Progress in Human Geography. Vol. 32(2), 308--318.
    [5]
    Dodington, E., 2013. How to Design with the Animal. Lessons in Cross-Species Architecture and Design. Independently published, privately funded.
    [6]
    Extended Environment (formerly Animal Architecture), expandedenvironment.org, Retrieved May 25, 2015.
    [7]
    Garfinkel, H. (1964). Studies of the Routine Grounds of Everyday Activities. In Social Problems, 11(3), 225--250.
    [8]
    Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [9]
    Goode, D. (2006). Playing with my dog Katie: An Ethnomethodological Study of Dog-Human Interaction. Purdue University Press.
    [10]
    Harrison, A. L. (Ed.) (2013). Architectural Theories of the Environment: Posthuman Territory. Routledge.
    [11]
    Harrison, A. L. (2013). Animal Interfaces for a Post-Human Territory. In ACSA Annual Meeting Proceedings, New Constellations, New Ecologies.
    [12]
    Heath, C., Hindmarch, J. and Luff, P. (2010). Video in Qualitative Research. Analysing Social Interaction in Everyday Life. London: SAGE.
    [13]
    Holmberg, T. (2013). Trans-Species Urban Politics: Stories from a Beach. In Space and Culture. 16(1), 28--42.
    [14]
    Holmberg, T. (2015). Urban Animals: Crowding the Zoocities. Routledge.
    [15]
    Howell, P. (2012). Between the Muzzle and the Leash: Dog Walking, Discipline, and the Modern City. In: Atkins, P. (Ed). Animal Cities: Beastly Urban Histories. Ashgate.
    [16]
    Juhlin, O. & Weilenmann, A. (2011). Understanding People and Animals: The Use of a Positioning System in Ordinary Human-Canine Interaction. In Proc. of CHI '11 (ACM), 2631--2640.
    [17]
    Laurier, E., Maze, R. & Lundin, J. (2006). Putting the Dog Back in the Park: Animal and Human Mind in Action. In Mind, Culture, and Activity, 13(1), 2--24.
    [18]
    Lee, S. P. Cheok A. D., James T. K. S. 2006. A Mobile Pet Wearable Computer and Mixed Reality System for Human-Poultry Interaction through the Internet. In Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 10, 301--317.
    [19]
    Lorimer, J. (2010). Moving Image Methodologies for More-than-Human Geographies. In Cultural Geographies. 17(2), 237--258.
    [20]
    McGrath, R. (2009). Species-Appropriate Computer-Mediated Interaction. In CHI '09 (ACM), 2529--2534.
    [21]
    Mancini, C. (2011). Animal-Computer Interaction: A Manifesto. In: Interactions. 18(4), 69--73. ACM.
    [22]
    Mancini, C., van der Linden, J., Bryan, J., & Stuart, A. (2012). Exploring Interspecies Sensemaking: Dog Tracking Semiotics and Multispecies Ethnography. In Proc. of UbiComp'12, 143--152.
    [23]
    Mancini, C., Harris, R., Aengenheister, B., & Guest, C. (2015). Re-Centering Multispecies Practices: A Canine Interface for Cancer Detection Dogs. In Proc. of CHI '15 (ACM), 2673--2682.
    [24]
    Obrist, M., Tuch, A. N., and Hornbaek, H. (2014). Opportunities for Odor: Experiences with Smell and Implications for Technology. In Proc CHI '14 (ACM), 2843--2852.
    [25]
    Paldanius, M., Karkkainen, T., Vaananen-Vainio-Mattila, K., Juhlin, O., and Hakkila, J. (2011). Communication Technology for Human-Dog Interaction: Exploration of Dog Owners' Experiences and Expectations. In Proc. CHI '11 (ACM), 2641--2650.
    [26]
    Robinson, C., Mancini, C., van der Linden, J., Guest, C., Harris, R. (2014). Canine-Centered Interface Design: Supporting the Work of Diabetes Alert Dogs. In Proc. CHI '14 (ACM), 3757--3766.
    [27]
    Philo, C. & Wilbert, C. (Eds.) (2000). Animal Spaces, Beastly Places: New Geographies of Human-Animal Relations. London: Routledge.
    [28]
    Randall, D., Harper, R., & Rouncefield, M. (2007). Fieldwork for Design: Theory and Practice. Springer.
    [29]
    Ryave, A. L., & Schenkein, J. N. (1974). Notes on the Art of Walking. In R. Turner (Ed.), Ethnomethodology. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    [30]
    Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [31]
    Tarsitano, E. (2006). Interaction Between the Environment and Animals in Urban Settings: Integrated and Participatory Planning. In Journal of Environmental Management. 38, 799--809.
    [32]
    Wolch, J. & Emel, J. (Eds.) (1998). Animal Geographies: Place, Politics and Identity in the Nature-Culture Borderlands. New York: Verso.
    [33]
    Wolch, J. (1996). Zoöpolis. In Capitalism Nature Socialism, 7(2), 21--47.
    [34]
    Wolch, J. (2002). Anima Urbis. In Progress of Human Geography, 26(6), 721--742.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Stray Animals-City Entanglements: Exploring the Potentials for Equitable Coexistence In Urban TürkiyeProceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3563657.3596031(1472-1484)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
    • (2023)Olfaction and Dog WelfareOlfactory Research in Dogs10.1007/978-3-031-39370-9_10(205-234)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2023
    • (2021)Leashing the City: Dog-Leash-Human Entanglements and the Urban SpaceProceedings of the Eight International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction10.1145/3493842.3493889(1-7)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2021
    • Show More Cited By

    Index Terms

    1. Smelling, pulling, and looking: unpacking similarities and differences in dog and human city life

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ACE '15: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology
      November 2015
      388 pages
      ISBN:9781450338523
      DOI:10.1145/2832932
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 16 November 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. animal-computer interaction
      2. dog walking
      3. dog-dog interaction
      4. dogs
      5. ethnomethodology
      6. human-dog interaction
      7. smelling
      8. urban design

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      ACE 2015

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 36 of 90 submissions, 40%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)39
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
      Reflects downloads up to 11 Aug 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2023)Stray Animals-City Entanglements: Exploring the Potentials for Equitable Coexistence In Urban TürkiyeProceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3563657.3596031(1472-1484)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
      • (2023)Olfaction and Dog WelfareOlfactory Research in Dogs10.1007/978-3-031-39370-9_10(205-234)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2023
      • (2021)Leashing the City: Dog-Leash-Human Entanglements and the Urban SpaceProceedings of the Eight International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction10.1145/3493842.3493889(1-7)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2021
      • (2020)Designing Slow Cities for More Than Human Enrichment: Dog Tales—Using Narrative Methods to Understand Co-Performative Place-MakingMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti50100015:1(1)Online publication date: 23-Dec-2020
      • (2019)Barks & RecProceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction10.1145/3371049.3371064(1-6)Online publication date: 12-Nov-2019
      • (2018)Understanding animalsProceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3240167.3240226(148-160)Online publication date: 29-Sep-2018
      • (2017)Animal personasProceedings of the 31st British Computer Society Human Computer Interaction Conference10.14236/ewic/HCI2017.37(1-13)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2017
      • (2017)Technology for Bonding in Human-Animal InteractionProceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction10.1145/3152130.3152153(1-5)Online publication date: 21-Nov-2017
      • (2017)A dog centred approach to the analysis of dogs' interactions with media on TV screensInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.05.00798:C(208-220)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2017
      • (2017)Theorizing animal-computer interaction as machinationsInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.05.00598:C(135-149)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2017
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media