Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2835022.2835032acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Where Chicagoans tweet the most: Semantic analysis of preferential return locations of Twitter users

Published: 03 November 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Recent studies on human mobility show that human movements are not random and tend to be clustered. In this connection, the movements of Twitter users captured by geo-located tweets were found to follow similar patterns, where a few geographic locations dominate the tweeting activity of individual users. However, little is known about the semantics (landuse types) and temporal tweeting behavior at those frequently-visited locations. Furthermore, it is generally assumed that the top two visited locations for most of the users are home and work locales (Hypothesis A) and people tend to tweet at their top locations during a particular time of the day (Hypothesis B). In this paper, we tested these two frequently cited hypotheses by examining the tweeting patterns of more than 164,000 unique Twitter users whom were residents of the city of Chicago during 2014. We extracted landuse attributes for each geo-located tweet from the detailed inventory of the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning. Top-visited locations were identified by clustering semantic enriched tweets using a DBSCAN algorithm. Our results showed that although the top two locations are likely to be residential and occupational/educational, a portion of the users deviated from this case, suggesting that the first hypothesis oversimplify real-world situations. However, our observations indicated that people tweet at specific times and these temporal signatures are dependent on landuse types. We further discuss the implication of confounding variables, such as clustering algorithm parameters and relative accuracy of tweet coordinates, which are critical factors in any experimental design involving Twitter data.

References

[1]
González, M.C., Hidalgo, C.A. and Barabási, A.-L. 2008. Understanding individual human mobility patterns. Nature. 453, 7196 (Jun. 2008), 779--782. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06958
[2]
Song, C., Qu, Z., Blumm, N. and Barabasi, A.-L. 2010. Limits of Predictability in Human Mobility. Science. 327, 5968 (Feb. 2010), 1018--1021. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1177170
[3]
Padmanabhan, A., Wang, S., Cao, G., Hwang, M., Zhang, Z., Gao, Y., Soltani, K. and Liu, Y. 2014. FluMapper: A cyberGIS application for interactive analysis of massive location-based social media. Concurr. Comp-Pract. 26, 13 (Sep. 2014), 2253--2265. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpe.3287
[4]
Wang, Q. and Taylor, J.E. 2014. Quantifying human mobility perturbation and resilience in Hurricane Sandy. PLoS ONE (Nov. 2014), e112608--e112608. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112608
[5]
Jurdak, R., Zhao, K., Liu, J., AbouJaoude, M., Cameron, M. and Newth, D. 2014. Understanding Human Mobility from Twitter. arXiv:1412.2154 {physics}. (Dec. 2014).
[6]
Frank, M.R., Mitchell, L., Dodds, P.S. and Danforth, C.M. 2013. Happiness and the Patterns of Life: A Study of Geo-located Tweets. Scientific Reports. 3, (Sep. 2013). DOI = http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep02625
[7]
Liu, J., Zhao, K., Khan, S., Cameron, M. and Jurdak, R. 2014. Multi-scale population and mobility estimation with geo-tagged Tweets. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.0327.
[8]
Cao, G., Wang, S., Hwang, M., Padmanabhan, A., Zhang, Z. and Soltani, K. 2015. A scalable framework for spatiotemporal analysis of location-based social media data. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst.51, (2015), 70--82. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.01.002
[9]
Li, Z., Ding, B., Han, J., Kays, R. and Nye, P. 2010. Mining periodic behaviors for moving objects. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (Washington, DC, USA, on July 24-28, 2010), 1099--1108. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10618-011-0227-9
[10]
Cao, L., Luo, J., Gallagher, A., Jin, X., Han, J. and Huang, T.S. 2010. A worldwide tourism recommendation system based on geotagged web photos. In Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), (Dallas, Texas, USA, March 14-19, 2010), 2274--2277. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2010.5495905
[11]
Bora, N., Chang, Y.-H. and Maheswaran, R. 2014. Mobility patterns and user dynamics in racially segregated geographies of US cities. In Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction, W. G. Kennedy, N. Agarwal and S.J. Yang, Eds. Springer. 11--18. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05579-4_2
[12]
CMAP 2014. Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning's 2010 Land Use Inventory for Northeastern Illinois.
[13]
Ester, M., Kriegel, H.P., Sander, J. and Xu, X. 1996. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD-96 (Portland, Oregon, USA, August 2--4, 1996), 226--231. DOI = http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009745219419
[14]
Jiang, S., Ferreira, J. and González, M.C. 2012. Clustering daily patterns of human activities in the city. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. 25, 3 (Nov. 2012), 478--510. DOI = http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10618-012-0264-z

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)An evaluation of geo-located Twitter data for measuring human migrationInternational Journal of Geographical Information Science10.1080/13658816.2022.207587836:9(1830-1852)Online publication date: 15-Jun-2022
  • (2021)Characterizing People’s Daily Activity Patterns in the Urban Environment: A Mobility Network Approach with Geographic Context-Aware Twitter DataAnnals of the American Association of Geographers10.1080/24694452.2020.1867498(1-21)Online publication date: 8-Apr-2021
  • (2021)Modeling human activity dynamics: an object-class oriented space–time composite model based on social media and urban infrastructure dataComputational Urban Science10.1007/s43762-021-00006-x1:1Online publication date: 6-May-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Where Chicagoans tweet the most: Semantic analysis of preferential return locations of Twitter users

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    UrbanGIS'15: Proceedings of the 1st International ACM SIGSPATIAL Workshop on Smart Cities and Urban Analytics
    November 2015
    128 pages
    ISBN:9781450339735
    DOI:10.1145/2835022
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 03 November 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Big Data
    2. Twitter
    3. human mobility
    4. semantic trajectories
    5. social media
    6. urban activity

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    SIGSPATIAL'15
    Sponsor:

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 11 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)An evaluation of geo-located Twitter data for measuring human migrationInternational Journal of Geographical Information Science10.1080/13658816.2022.207587836:9(1830-1852)Online publication date: 15-Jun-2022
    • (2021)Characterizing People’s Daily Activity Patterns in the Urban Environment: A Mobility Network Approach with Geographic Context-Aware Twitter DataAnnals of the American Association of Geographers10.1080/24694452.2020.1867498(1-21)Online publication date: 8-Apr-2021
    • (2021)Modeling human activity dynamics: an object-class oriented space–time composite model based on social media and urban infrastructure dataComputational Urban Science10.1007/s43762-021-00006-x1:1Online publication date: 6-May-2021
    • (2019)The Social Integration of American Cities: Network Measures of Connectedness Based on Everyday Mobility Across NeighborhoodsSociological Methods & Research10.1177/004912411985238650:3(1110-1149)Online publication date: 17-Jul-2019
    • (2018)An approach for understanding human activity patterns with the motivations behindInternational Journal of Geographical Information Science10.1080/13658816.2018.153035433:2(385-407)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2018
    • (2017)Social sensing of urban land use based on analysis of Twitter users’ mobility patternsPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.018165712:7(e0181657)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2017
    • (2016)UrbanFlowProceedings of the XSEDE16 Conference on Diversity, Big Data, and Science at Scale10.1145/2949550.2949578(1-8)Online publication date: 17-Jul-2016

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media