Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2835776.2835831acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswsdmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Portrait of an Online Shopper: Understanding and Predicting Consumer Behavior

Published: 08 February 2016 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Consumer spending accounts for a large fraction of economic footprint of modern countries. Increasingly, consumer activity is moving to the web, where digital receipts of online purchases provide valuable data sources detailing consumer behavior. We consider such data extracted from emails and combined with with consumers' demographic information, which we use to characterize, model, and predict purchasing behavior. We analyze such behavior of consumers in different age and gender groups, and find interesting, actionable patterns that can be used to improve ad targeting systems. For example, we found that the amount of money spent on online purchases grows sharply with age, peaking in the late 30s, while shoppers from wealthy areas tend to purchase more expensive items and buy them more frequently. Furthermore, we look at the influence of social connections on purchasing habits, as well as at the temporal dynamics of online shopping where we discovered daily and weekly behavioral patterns. Finally, we build a model to predict when shoppers are most likely to make a purchase and how much will they spend, showing improvement over baseline approaches. The presented results paint a clear picture of a modern online shopper, and allow better understanding of consumer behavior that can help improve marketing efforts and make shopping more pleasant and efficient experience for online customers.

    References

    [1]
    Combination of multiple classifiers for the customer's purchase behavior prediction. Decision Support Systems, 34(2):167 -- 175, 2003.
    [2]
    Understanding gender-based differences in consumer e-commerce adoption. Commun. Association for Information Systems, 26, 2005.
    [3]
    L. M. Aiello, A. Barrat, C. Cattuto, G. Ruffo, and R. Schifanella. Link creation and profile alignment in the aNobii social network. In SocialCom, 2010.
    [4]
    L. M. Aiello, A. Barrat, R. Schifanella, C. Cattuto, B. Markines, and F. Menczer. Friendship prediction and homophily in social media. ACM Trans. Web, 6(2):9:1--9:33, Jun 2012.
    [5]
    A. Anagnostopoulos, R. Kumar, and M. Mahdian. Influence and correlation in social networks. In KDD, pp. 7--15, 2008.
    [6]
    S. Bellman, G. L. Lohse, and E. J. Johnson. Predictors of online buying behavior. Commun. ACM, 42(12):32--38, 1999.
    [7]
    A. Bhatnagar, S. Misra, and H. R. Rao. On risk, convenience, and internet shopping behavior. Commun. ACM, 43(11):98--105, Nov. 2000.
    [8]
    J.-S. Chiou and C.-C. Ting. Will you spend more money and time on internet shopping when the product and situation are right? Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1):203--208, 2011.
    [9]
    D. Crandall, D. Cosley, D. Huttenlocher, J. Kleinberg, and S. Suri. Feedback effects between similarity and social influence in online communities. In KDD'08, pp. 160--168, 2008.
    [10]
    R. R. Dholakia. Going shopping: key determinants of shopping behaviors and motivations. Int. J. Retail & Distribution Management, 27(4):154--165, 1999.
    [11]
    R. R. Dholakia. Going shopping: key determinants of shopping behaviors and motivations. Int. J. Retail and Distribution Management, 27:154--165, 1999.
    [12]
    N. Djuric, V. Radosavljevic, M. Grbovic, and N. Bhamidipati. Hidden conditional random fields with deep user embeddings for ad targeting. In ICDM, pp. 779--784, 2014.
    [13]
    R. Y. Du and W. A. Kamakura. Where did all that money go? understanding how consumers allocate their consumption budget. J. Marketing, 72(6):109--131, 2008.
    [14]
    W. N. Evans and T. J. Moore. Liquidity, economic activity, and mortality. Review of Economics and Statistics, 94(2):400--418, Jan. 2011.
    [15]
    S. Farag, T. Schwanen, M. Dijst, and J. Faber. Shopping online and/or in-store? a structural equation model of the relationships between e-shopping and in-store shopping. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 41(2):125--141, 2007.
    [16]
    S. L. Feld. The focused organization of social ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 86(5):1015--1035, 1981.
    [17]
    E. Garbarino and M. Strahilevitz. Gender differences in the perceived risk of buying online and the effects of receiving a site recommendation. J. Business Research, 57(7):768--775, 2004.
    [18]
    M. Grbovic and S. Vucetic. Generating ad targeting rules using sparse principal component analysis with constraints. In WWW Companion, pp. 283--284, 2014.
    [19]
    S. Guo, M. Wang, and J. Leskovec. The role of social networks in online shopping: Information passing, price of trust, and consumer choice. In EC, pp. 157--166, 2011.
    [20]
    V. Gupta, D. Varshney, H. Jhamtani, D. Kedia, and S. Karwa. Identifying purchase intent from social posts. In ICWSM, 2014.
    [21]
    T. Hansen, J. Moller Jensen, and H. Stubbe Solgaard. Predicting online grocery buying intention: a comparison of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior. Int. J. Information Management, 24(6):539--550, 2004.
    [22]
    C. R. Hayhoe, L. J. Leach, P. R. Turner, M. J. Bruin, and F. C. Lawrence. Differences in spending habits and credit use of college students. J. Consumer Affairs, 34(1):113--133, 2000.
    [23]
    J. A. Horrigan. Online shopping. Pew Internet & American Life Project Report, 36, 2008.
    [24]
    T.-K. Hui and D. Wan. Factors affecting internet shopping behaviour in singapore: gender and educational issues. Int. J. Consumer Studies, 31(3):310--316, 2007.
    [25]
    J.-H. Kang and K. Lerman. Using lists to measure homophily on twitter. In AAAI workshop on Intelligent Techniques for Web Personalization and Recommendation, July 2012.
    [26]
    F. Kooti, L. M. Aiello, M. Grbovic, K. Lerman, and A. Mantrach. Evolution of conversations in the age of email overload. In WWW, pp. 603--613, 2015.
    [27]
    J. Leskovec, L. A. Adamic, and B. A. Huberman. The dynamics of viral marketing. ACM Trans. Web, 1(1), May 2007.
    [28]
    G. Linden, B. Smith, and J. York. Amazon.com recommendations: Item-to-item collaborative filtering. IEEE Internet Computing, 7(1):76--80, Jan. 2003.
    [29]
    M. McPherson, L. Smith-Lovin, and J. M. Cook. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1):415--444, 2001.
    [30]
    A. L. Montgomery, S. Li, K. Srinivasan, and J. C. Liechty. Predicting online purchase conversion using web path analysis. Technical report, 2002.
    [31]
    P. A. Pavlou and M. Fygenson. Understanding and predicting electronic commerce adoption: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. MIS quarterly, pp. 115--143, 2006.
    [32]
    T. Perea y Monsuwé, B. G. Dellaert, and K. De Ruyter. What drives consumers to shop online? a literature review. Int. J. Service Industry Management, 15(1):102--121, 2004.
    [33]
    T. Rodrigues, F. Benevenuto, M. Cha, K. Gummadi, and V. Almeida. On word-of-mouth based discovery of the web. In IMC, pp. 381--396, 2011.
    [34]
    S. Senecal, P. J. Kalczynski, and J. Nantel. Consumers' decision-making process and their online shopping behavior: a clickstream analysis. J. Business Research, 58(11):1599--1608, 2005.
    [35]
    C. R. Shalizi and A. C. Thomas. Homophily and contagion are generically confounded in observational social network studies. Sociological Methods and Research, 40(2):211--239, 2011.
    [36]
    C. Sismeiro and R. E. Bucklin. Modeling purchase behavior at an e-commerce web site: A task-completion approach. J. Marketing Research, 41(3):306--323, 2004.
    [37]
    S. Sobolevsky, I. Sitko, R. Tachet des Combes, B. Hawelka, J. Murillo Arias, and C. Ratti. Cities through the prism of people's spending behavior. arXiv, 2015.
    [38]
    P. Sorce, V. Perotti, and S. Widrick. Attitude and age differences in online buying. Int. J. Retail & Distribution Management, 33(2):122--132, 2005.
    [39]
    W. R. Swinyard and S. M. Smith. Why people (don't) shop online: A lifestyle study of the internet consumer. Psychology & Marketing, 20(7):567, 2003.
    [40]
    W. R. Swinyard and S. M. Smith. Activities, interests, and opinions of online shoppers and non-shoppers. International Business and Economics Research Journal, 3(4):37--48, 2011.
    [41]
    M. Tabatabaei. Online shopping perceptions of offline shoppers. Issues in Information Systems, 10(2):22--26, 2009.
    [42]
    T. S. Teo. Attitudes toward online shopping and the internet. Behaviour & Information Technology, 21(4):259--271, 2002.
    [43]
    F. Ulbrich, T. Christensen, and L. Stankus. Gender-specific on-line shopping preferences. Electronic Commerce Research, 11(2):181--199, 2011.
    [44]
    D. Van den Poel and W. Buckinx. Predicting online-purchasing behaviour. European Journal of Operational Research, 166(2):557--575, 2005.
    [45]
    C. Van Slyke, C. L. Comunale, and F. Belanger. Gender differences in perceptions of web-based shopping. Commun. ACM, 45(8):82--86, Aug. 2002.
    [46]
    M. Wolfinbarger and M. C. Gilly. Shopping online for freedom, control, and fun. California Management Review, 43(2):34--55, 2001.
    [47]
    M. Zaman and M. Y. W. Meng. Internet shopping adoption: A comparative study on city and regional consumers. In ANZMAC, pp. 2421--2428. Deakin University, 2002.
    [48]
    Y. Zhang and M. Pennacchiotti. Predicting purchase behaviors from social media. In WWW, pp. 1521--1532, 2013.
    [49]
    J. McAuley, R. Pandey, J. Leskovec. Inferring networks of substitutable and complementary products. In ACM SIGKDD, pp. 785--794, 2015.
    [50]
    M. Grbovic, V. Radosavljevic, N. Djuric, N. Bhamidipati, J. Savla, V. Bhagwan, and D. Sharp E-commerce in Your Inbox: Product Recommendations at Scale. In ACM SIGKDD, pp. 1809--1818, 2015.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)UBRMTC: User Behavior Recognition Model With Transaction CharacterIEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems10.1109/TCSS.2023.325722711:2(1589-1601)Online publication date: Apr-2024
    • (2023)Business Purchase Prediction Based on XAI and LSTM Neural NetworksElectronics10.3390/electronics1221451012:21(4510)Online publication date: 2-Nov-2023
    • (2023)Single and Multiple Separate LSTM Neural Networks for Multiple Output Feature Purchase PredictionElectronics10.3390/electronics1212261612:12(2616)Online publication date: 10-Jun-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    Index Terms

    1. Portrait of an Online Shopper: Understanding and Predicting Consumer Behavior

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      WSDM '16: Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining
      February 2016
      746 pages
      ISBN:9781450337168
      DOI:10.1145/2835776
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 08 February 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. demographics
      2. online shopping
      3. prediction
      4. shopping

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      • AFOSR
      • DARPA

      Conference

      WSDM 2016
      WSDM 2016: Ninth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining
      February 22 - 25, 2016
      California, San Francisco, USA

      Acceptance Rates

      WSDM '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 67 of 368 submissions, 18%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 498 of 2,863 submissions, 17%

      Upcoming Conference

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)507
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)59
      Reflects downloads up to 27 Jul 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)UBRMTC: User Behavior Recognition Model With Transaction CharacterIEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems10.1109/TCSS.2023.325722711:2(1589-1601)Online publication date: Apr-2024
      • (2023)Business Purchase Prediction Based on XAI and LSTM Neural NetworksElectronics10.3390/electronics1221451012:21(4510)Online publication date: 2-Nov-2023
      • (2023)Single and Multiple Separate LSTM Neural Networks for Multiple Output Feature Purchase PredictionElectronics10.3390/electronics1212261612:12(2616)Online publication date: 10-Jun-2023
      • (2023)Exploring Must-know Criteria for Effective Customer Segmentation in Online Market Using AHPReview of Marketing Science10.1515/roms-2023-002721:1(271-294)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2023
      • (2023)Modeling Within-Basket Auxiliary Item Recommendation with Matchability and UbiquityACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/357415714:3(1-19)Online publication date: 17-Feb-2023
      • (2023)Developing personas for live streaming commerce platforms with user survey dataUniversal Access in the Information Society10.1007/s10209-023-00996-xOnline publication date: 27-Apr-2023
      • (2023)Predicting Internet Usage for Digital Finance Services: Multitarget Classification Using Vector Generalized Additive Model with SMOTE-NCData Science and Emerging Technologies10.1007/978-981-99-0741-0_35(494-504)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2023
      • (2022)La réservation d’hôtel en ligne, quels déterminants pour le touriste : Cas du pourtour transfrontalier du LuxembourgProjectics / Proyéctica / Projectique10.3917/proj.031.0127n°31:1(127-145)Online publication date: 15-Jun-2022
      • (2022)Targeting the very important buyers VIB: A cluster analysis approachCogent Business & Management10.1080/23311975.2022.20884589:1Online publication date: 15-Jun-2022
      • (2022)Email thread sentiment sequence identification using PLSA clustering algorithmExpert Systems with Applications: An International Journal10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116475193:COnline publication date: 1-May-2022
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Get Access

      Login options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media