Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2836041.2836056acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmumConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Weather with you: evaluating report reliability in weather crowdsourcing

Published: 30 November 2015 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Several mobile and social media weather apps support the incorporation of human input in increasing their coverage and accuracy of current weather conditions. This practice is also known as participatory sensing: the act of using sensors (i.e. smartphones) carried by volunteers to acquire highly localized measurements of physical phenomena. In order to assess the accuracy of such user contributed weather reports, we created an android app called Atmos that allows for the in situ collection of weather data in the form of descriptive manual input. Based on a yearlong study with Atmos deployed on the Google Play store, we investigate the ability of mobile users to both report current weather conditions accurately, and to predict future weather developments. We found that mobile users can be sufficiently accurate when reporting current conditions, though report accuracy was affected by hour of day. Users were also able to provide accurate short-term predictions, particularly for temperature and wind intensity. We also present results from an online survey that gathered data from 12 countries in order to understand the role weather plays in users' daily life, which helped us design Atmos.

    References

    [1]
    Sabine Brasche and Wolfgang Bischof. 2005. Daily time spent indoors in German homes -- Baseline data for the assessment of indoor exposure of German occupants. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 208, 4: 247--253. httpp://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2005.03.003
    [2]
    Jeff Burke, Deborah Estrin, and Mark Hansen. 2007. Image Browsing, Processing, and Clustering for Participatory Sensing: Lessons From a DietSense Prototype. Retrieved October 12, 2013 from http://joshhyman.com/papers/reddy07dietsense.pdf
    [3]
    Jeffrey A. Burke, Deborah Estrin, Mark Hansen, et al. 2006. Participatory sensing. Retrieved October 8, 2013 from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/19h777qd.pdf
    [4]
    T. S. Conner and K. A. Reid. 2012. Effects of intensive mobile happiness reporting in daily life. Social Psychological and Personality Science 3, 3: 315--323.
    [5]
    Rosemary Day. 2007. Place and the experience of air quality. Health & Place 13, 1: 249--260. httpp://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2006.01.002
    [6]
    Prabal Dutta, Paul M. Aoki, Neil Kumar, et al. 2009. Common sense: participatory urban sensing using a network of handheld air quality monitors. Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on embedded networked sensor systems, 349-350. Retrieved October 12, 2013 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1644095
    [7]
    J. E. Ephrath, J. Goudriaan, and A. Marani. 1996. Modelling diurnal patterns of air temperature, radiation wind speed and relative humidity by equations from daily characteristics. Agricultural systems 51, 4: 377--393.
    [8]
    G. P. S. Free. 2012. Navigation with Turn by Turn-Waze. Retrieved April. Retrieved from http://www.waze.com
    [9]
    D. A. Hennessy, D. L. Wiesenthal, and P. M. Kohn. 2000. The Influence of Traffic Congestion, Daily Hassles, and Trait Stress Susceptibility on State Driver Stress: An Interactive Perspectivel. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research 5, 2: 162--179.
    [10]
    Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky. 1973. On the psychology of prediction. Psychological review 80, 4: 237.
    [11]
    Salil S. Kanhere. 2013. Participatory sensing: Crowdsourcing data from mobile smartphones in urban spaces. In Distributed Computing and Internet Technology. Springer, 19-26. Retrieved September 24, 2013 from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-36071-8_2
    [12]
    Eiman Kanjo. 2009. NoiseSPY: A Real-Time Mobile Phone Platform for Urban Noise Monitoring and Mapping. Mobile Networks and Applications 15, 4: 562--574. httpp://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-009-0217-y
    [13]
    M. A. Killingsworth and D. T. Gilbert. 2010. A Wandering Mind Is an Unhappy Mind. Science 330, 6006: 932--932. httpp://doi.org/10.1126/science.1192439
    [14]
    George MacKerron and Susana Mourato. 2013. Happiness is greater in natural environments. Global Environmental Change 23, 5: 992--1000. httpp://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.010
    [15]
    Emiliano Miluzzo, Nicholas D. Lane, Kristóf Fodor, et al. 2008. Sensing meets mobile social networks: the design, implementation and evaluation of the CenceMe application. Proceedings of the 6th ACM conference on Embedded network sensor systems, 337-350. Retrieved October 12, 2013 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1460445
    [16]
    Prashanth Mohan, Venkata N. Padmanabhan, and Ramachandran Ramjee. 2008. Nericell: rich monitoring of road and traffic conditions using mobile smartphones. Proceedings of the 6th ACM conference on Embedded network sensor systems, 323-336. Retrieved October 12, 2013 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1460444
    [17]
    Evangelos Niforatos, Ahmed Fouad, Elhart Ivan, and Marc Langheinrich. 2015. WeatherUSI: Crowdsourcing Weather Experience on Public Displays. The 4th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays, ACM.
    [18]
    Evangelos Niforatos, Athanasios Vourvopoulos, Marc Langheinrich, Pedro Campos, and Andre Doria. 2014. Atmos: A Hybrid Crowdsourcing Approach to Weather Estimation (Poster Abstract). Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct Publication, ACM, 135--138. httpp://doi.org/10.1145/2638728.2638780
    [19]
    Oklahoma Norman and O. K. Norman. 2013. mPING: Crowd-Sourcing Weather Reports for Research. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. Retrieved May 22, 2013 from http://cimms.ou.edu/~lakshman/Papers/mPING.pdf
    [20]
    A. Overeem, J. C. R. Robinson, H. Leijnse, G. J. Steeneveld, B. K. P. Horn, and R. Uijlenhoet. 2013. Crowdsourcing urban air temperatures from smartphone battery temperatures: AIR TEMPERATURES FROM SMARTPHONES. Geophysical Research Letters 40, 15: 4081--4085. httpp://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50786
    [21]
    Richard M. Ryan, Jessey H. Bernstein, and Kirk Warren Brown. 2010. Weekends, work, and well-being: Psychological need satisfactions and day of the week effects on mood, vitality, and physical symptoms. Journal of social and clinical psychology 29, 1: 95--122.
    [22]
    Pedro Sanches, Kristina Höök, Elsa Vaara, et al. 2010. Mind the body!: designing a mobile stress management application encouraging personal reflection. Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on designing interactive systems, ACM, 47-56. Retrieved May 12, 2014 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1858182
    [23]
    Arthur A. Stone, Joshua M. Smyth, Thomas Pickering, and Joseph Schwartz. 1996. Daily mood variability: Form of diurnal patterns and determinants of diurnal patterns. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 26, 14: 1286--1305.
    [24]
    iSPEX: Measure aerosols with your smartphone. Retrieved from http://ispex.nl/en/
    [25]
    The Integration of Things: Environmental Sensors. Retrieved from http://sensordrone.com/index.php
    [26]
    InstaWeather. Retrieved August 11, 2015 from http://instaweather.me/
    [27]
    Weather Underground. Retrieved from http://www.wunderground.com/

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2021)The Societal Echo of Severe Weather Events: Ambient Geospatial Information (AGI) on a Storm EventISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information10.3390/ijgi1012081510:12(815)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2021
    • (2019)Social weather: A review of crowdsourcing‐assisted meteorological knowledge services through social cyberspaceGeoscience Data Journal10.1002/gdj3.857:1(61-79)Online publication date: 18-Dec-2019
    • (2018)W-AirProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/31917562:1(1-25)Online publication date: 26-Mar-2018
    • Show More Cited By

    Index Terms

    1. Weather with you: evaluating report reliability in weather crowdsourcing

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MUM '15: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia
      November 2015
      442 pages
      ISBN:9781450336055
      DOI:10.1145/2836041
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      • FH OOE: University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria
      • Johannes Kepler Univ Linz: Johannes Kepler Universität Linz

      In-Cooperation

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 30 November 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. crowdsourcing
      2. experience sampling (ESM)
      3. mobile sensing
      4. participatory sensing

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      • RECALL

      Conference

      MUM '15
      Sponsor:
      • FH OOE
      • Johannes Kepler Univ Linz

      Acceptance Rates

      MUM '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 33 of 89 submissions, 37%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 190 of 465 submissions, 41%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)17
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
      Reflects downloads up to 09 Aug 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2021)The Societal Echo of Severe Weather Events: Ambient Geospatial Information (AGI) on a Storm EventISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information10.3390/ijgi1012081510:12(815)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2021
      • (2019)Social weather: A review of crowdsourcing‐assisted meteorological knowledge services through social cyberspaceGeoscience Data Journal10.1002/gdj3.857:1(61-79)Online publication date: 18-Dec-2019
      • (2018)W-AirProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/31917562:1(1-25)Online publication date: 26-Mar-2018
      • (2018)Crowdsourcing Methods for Data Collection in Geophysics: State of the Art, Issues, and Future DirectionsReviews of Geophysics10.1029/2018RG00061656:4(698-740)Online publication date: 5-Dec-2018
      • (2017)Understanding the potential of humanmachine crowdsourcing for weather dataInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.10.002102:C(54-68)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2017
      • (2016)WeatherUSI: User-Based Weather Crowdsourcing on Public DisplaysWeb Engineering10.1007/978-3-319-38791-8_50(567-570)Online publication date: 25-May-2016

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media