Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2843043.2843048acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesaus-cswConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Adapting a knowledge-based schema matching system for ontology mapping

Published: 01 February 2016 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    In recent years, a large number of entities (ontology classes and properties) are found in different datasets over the Semantic Web. Due to the open and distributed nature of the Web, it is necessary to manage the heterogeneity problem between entities. In this context, the mapping of ontology entities from different datasets is important for data integration, data exchange and data warehousing. Existing semi-automatic ontology matching systems need some parameters such as thresholds and weights, and send the results to the users for adding correct and removing incorrect mapping manually. However, there is no existing solution for correcting these mappings automatically. The main goal of our research work is to do ontology mapping by adapting our Knowledge-based Schema Matching System (KSMS) that allows users to correct and validate the matching results automatically. Our approach is based on Hybrid Ripple-Down Rules (RDR) that combines machine learning and knowledge acquisition approaches. In the hybrid approach, first a machine learning algorithm is used for classifying entities, and then rules are added by incremental knowledge acquisition for solving matching errors such as false positives and false negatives at the element level. The system also computes structure level matching considering hierarchical structure of a full graph. In this research, we perform experiments on the conference track of the ontology alignment contest OAEI 2014. Experimental results demonstrate that our system improves performance in terms of precision, recall and F-measure.

    References

    [1]
    Faria, D., Pesquita, C., Santos, E., Palmonari, M., Cruz, I. F. and Couto, F. M. The agreementmakerlight ontology matching system. In On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2013 Conferences, 2013, Springer.
    [2]
    Cate, B. T., Dalmau, V. and Kolaitis, P. G. Learning schema mappings. ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), 2013. 38(4): p. 28.
    [3]
    Shvaiko, P. and Euzenat, J. A survey of schema-based matching approaches. In Journal on Data Semantics IV, 2005, Springer, p. 146--171.
    [4]
    Cheatham, M. and Hitzler, P. String similarity metrics for ontology alignment. In The Semantic Web--ISWC, 2013, Springer, p. 294--309.
    [5]
    Anam, S., Kim, Y. S., Kang, B. H. and Liu, Q. Evaluation of Terminological Schema Matching and Its Implications for Schema Mapping. In PRICAI 2014: Trends in Artificial Intelligence, 2014, Springer International Publishing, p. 561--572.
    [6]
    Ngo, D. H. and Bellahsene, Z. YAM++: (not) Yet Another Matcher for Ontology Matching Task. In BDA'2012: 28e journées Bases de Données Avancées, 2012.
    [7]
    Aumueller, D., Do, H.-H., Massmann, S. and Rahm, E. Schema and ontology matching with COMA++. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, 2005, ACM.
    [8]
    Peukert, E., Eberius, J. and Rahm, E. A self-configuring schema matching system. In Data Engineering (ICDE), 2012 IEEE 28th International Conference on, 2012, IEEE.
    [9]
    Djeddi, W. E. and Khadir, M. T. XMap++: Results for OAEI 2014, 2014.
    [10]
    Khiat, A. and Benaissa, M. AOT/AOTL Results for OAEI 2014. 2014.
    [11]
    Duchateau, F., Coletta, R., Bellahsene, Z. and Miller, R. J. Yam: a schema matcher factory. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management, 2009, ACM.
    [12]
    Anam, S., Kim, Y. S., Kang, B. H. and Liu, Q. Designing A Knowledge-based Schema Matching System for Schema Mapping. In Thirteenth Australasian Data Mining Conference, AusDM, 2015, CRPITT: Sydney, Australia.
    [13]
    Noy, N. F. and Klein, M. Ontology evolution: Not the same as schema evolution. In Knowledge and information systems, 2004. 6(4): p. 428--440.
    [14]
    Anam, S., Kim, Y. S., Kang, B. H. and Liu, Q. Schema Mapping Using Hybrid Ripple-Down Rules. In the Thirty-Eighth Australasian Computer Science Conference, ACSC 2015, CRPIT: Sydney, Australia, p. 17--26.
    [15]
    Wang, Y., Liu, W. and Bell, D. A. A structure-based similarity spreading approach for ontology matching, In Scalable Uncertainty Management, 2010, Springer, p. 361--374.
    [16]
    Melnik, S., Garcia-Molina, H. and Rahm, E. Similarity flooding: A versatile graph matching algorithm and its application to schema matching. In Data Engineering, 2002. Proceedings. 18th International Conference on, 2002, IEEE.
    [17]
    Shen, G., Liu, Y., Fei Wang, J. S., Wang, Z., Huang, Z. and Kang, D. OMReasoner: Combination of Multi-matchers for Ontology Matching: results for OAEI 2014, 2014.
    [18]
    Peukert, E., Eberius, J. and Rahm, E. AMC-A framework for modelling and comparing matching systems as matching processes. In Data Engineering (ICDE), 2011 IEEE 27th International Conference, 2011, IEEE.
    [19]
    Cruz, I. F., Antonelli, F. P. and Stroe, C. AgreementMaker: efficient matching for large real-world schemas and ontologies. In Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 2009. 2(2): p. 1586--1589.
    [20]
    Kim, Y. S., Compton, P. and Kang, B. H. Ripple-down rules with censored production rules, in Knowledge Management and Acquisition for Intelligent Systems. 2012, Springer, p. 175--187.
    [21]
    Do, H.-H. and Rahm, E. COMA: a system for flexible combination of schema matching approaches. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Very Large Data Bases, 2002, VLDB Endowment.
    [22]
    Cohen, W. W., Ravikumar, P. D. and Fienberg, S. E. A Comparison of String Distance Metrics for Name-Matching Tasks. In IIWeb, 2003.
    [23]
    Cheatham, M. and Hitzler, P. The Role of String Similarity Metrics in Ontology Alignment. 2013.
    [24]
    Compton, P. and Jansen, R. A philosophical basis for knowledge acquisition. In Knowledge acquisition, 1990. 2(3): p. 241--258.
    [25]
    Euzenat, J., Euzenat, J. and Shvaiko, P. Ontology matching. 2007, Book, Springer.
    [26]
    Duchateau, F., Bellahsene, Z. and Coletta, R. A flexible approach for planning schema matching algorithms, in On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2008, 2008, Springer, p. 249--264.
    [27]
    Stoilos, G., Stamou, G. and Kollias, S. A string metric for ontology alignment. In The Semantic Web--ISWC, 2005, Springer, p. 624--637.
    [28]
    Cheng, W., Lin, H. and Sun, Y. An efficient schema matching algorithm. In Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, 2005, Springer.
    [29]
    Eckert, K., Meilicke, C. and Stuckenschmidt, H. Improving ontology matching using meta-level learning. In The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, 2009, Springer, p. 158--172.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)Background knowledge in ontology matching: A surveySemantic Web10.3233/SW-223085(1-55)Online publication date: 8-Sep-2022
    • (2021)Designing a Business View of Enterprise DataProceedings of the 25th International Database Engineering & Applications Symposium10.1145/3472163.3472276(184-193)Online publication date: 14-Jul-2021
    • (2020)Structural Data Binding for Agile Changeability in Distributed Application IntegrationSoftware Engineering for Agile Application Development10.4018/978-1-7998-2531-9.ch003(51-81)Online publication date: 2020
    • Show More Cited By

    Index Terms

    1. Adapting a knowledge-based schema matching system for ontology mapping

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ACSW '16: Proceedings of the Australasian Computer Science Week Multiconference
      February 2016
      654 pages
      ISBN:9781450340427
      DOI:10.1145/2843043
      © 2016 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 01 February 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. decision tree
      2. element and structure level matching
      3. hybrid ripple-down rules
      4. knowledge acquisition
      5. ontology matching and mapping

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      • Tasmanian Government

      Conference

      ACSW '16
      ACSW '16: Australasian Computer Science Week
      February 1 - 5, 2016
      Canberra, Australia

      Acceptance Rates

      ACSW '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 77 of 172 submissions, 45%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 204 of 424 submissions, 48%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 26 Jul 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2022)Background knowledge in ontology matching: A surveySemantic Web10.3233/SW-223085(1-55)Online publication date: 8-Sep-2022
      • (2021)Designing a Business View of Enterprise DataProceedings of the 25th International Database Engineering & Applications Symposium10.1145/3472163.3472276(184-193)Online publication date: 14-Jul-2021
      • (2020)Structural Data Binding for Agile Changeability in Distributed Application IntegrationSoftware Engineering for Agile Application Development10.4018/978-1-7998-2531-9.ch003(51-81)Online publication date: 2020
      • (2020)Lowering Coupling in Distributed Applications With Compliance and ConformanceApplications and Approaches to Object-Oriented Software Design10.4018/978-1-7998-2142-7.ch002(35-77)Online publication date: 2020
      • (2020)Improving Application Decoupling in Virtual Enterprise IntegrationHandbook of Research on Social and Organizational Dynamics in the Digital Era10.4018/978-1-5225-8933-4.ch005(84-114)Online publication date: 2020
      • (2019)Improving Application Integration by Combining Services and ResourcesNew Perspectives on Information Systems Modeling and Design10.4018/978-1-5225-7271-8.ch009(197-226)Online publication date: 2019
      • (2019)Cloud-Based Application Integration in Virtual EnterprisesGlobal Virtual Enterprises in Cloud Computing Environments10.4018/978-1-5225-3182-1.ch003(46-85)Online publication date: 2019
      • (2018)Beyond SOA and REST for Distributed Application IntegrationInnovative Applications of Knowledge Discovery and Information Resources Management10.4018/978-1-5225-5829-3.ch011(228-257)Online publication date: 2018
      • (2017)Knowledge Fusion and Synchronization over Ubiquitous Ontology MappingJournal of Computer and Communications10.4236/jcc.2017.51000105:10(1-9)Online publication date: 2017
      • (2017)OntoYield: A Semantic Approach for Context-Based Ontology Recommendation Based on Structure PreservationProceedings of International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Data Engineering10.1007/978-981-10-6319-0_22(265-275)Online publication date: 21-Dec-2017
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media