Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Investigating the Implications of 3D Printing in Special Education

Published: 18 March 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Consumer-grade digital fabrication such as 3D printing is on the rise, and we believe it can be leveraged to great benefit in special education. Although 3D printing is infiltrating mainstream education, little research has explored 3D printing in the context of students with special support needs. We describe our studies on this topic and the resulting contributions. We initially conducted a formative study exploring the use of 3D printing at three locations serving populations with varying ability, including individuals with cognitive, motor, and visual impairments. We found that 3D design and printing perform three functions in special education: (1) STEM engagement, (2) creation of educational aids for accessible curriculum content, and (3) making custom adaptive devices. As part of our formative work, we also discussed a case study in the codesign of an assistive hand grip created with occupational therapists at one of our investigation sites. This work inspired further studies on the creation of adaptive devices using 3D printers. We identified the needs and constraints of these therapists and found implications for a specialized 3D modeling tool to support their use of 3D printers. We developed GripFab, 3D modeling software based on feedback from therapists, and used it to explore the feasibility of in-house 3D object designs in support of accessibility. Our contributions include case studies at three special education sites and discussion of obstacles to efficient 3D printing in this context. We have extended these contributions with a more in-depth look at the stakeholders and findings from GripFab studies. We have expanded our discussion to include suggestions for researchers in this space, in addition to refined suggestions from our earlier work for technologists creating 3D modeling and printing tools, therapists seeking to leverage 3D printers, and educators and administrators looking to implement these design tools in special education environments.

References

[1]
Paulo Blikstein and Dennis Krannich. 2013. The makers’ movement and FabLabs in education: Experiences, technologies, and research. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC’13). 613--616.
[2]
Craig Brown and Amy Hurst. 2012. VizTouch: Automatically generated tactile visualizations of coordinate spaces. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (TEI’12). ACM, New York, 131--138.
[3]
Erin Buehler, Shaun K. Kane, and Amy Hurst. 2014. ABC and 3D: Opportunities and obstacles to 3D printing in special education environments. In Proceedings of the 16th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’14).
[4]
Jodie Copley and Jenny Ziviani. 2004. Barriers to the use of assistive technology for children with multiple disabilities. Occupational Therapy International 11, 4 (January 2004), 229--243.
[5]
Melissa Dawe. 2006. Desperately seeking simplicity: How young adults with cognitive disabilities and their families adopt assistive technologies. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’06). 1143--1152.
[6]
Sean Follmer, David Carr, Emily Lovell, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2010. CopyCAD: Remixing physical objects with copy and paste from the real world. In 23rd ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST'10). 381--382.
[7]
Gillian R. Hayes, Sen Hirano, Gabriela Marcu, Mohamad Monibi, David H. Nguyen, and Michael Yeganyan. 2010. Interactive visual supports for children with autism. Personal Ubiquitous Computing 14, 7 (April 2010), 663--680.
[8]
Yingdan Huang and Michael Eisenberg. 2012. Easigami: Virtual creation by physical folding. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (TEI'12), Stephen N. Spencer (Ed.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 41--48.
[9]
Amy Hurst and Shaun Kane. 2013. Making “making” accessible. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC’13). ACM, New York, 635--638.
[10]
Amy Hurst and Jasmine Tobias. 2011. Empowering individuals with do-it-yourself assistive technology. In Proceedings of the 13th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’11). ACM, New York, 11--18.
[11]
Shahram Izadi, Richard A. Newcombe, David Kim, Otmar Hilliges, David Molyneaux, Steve Hodges, Pushmeet Kohli, Jamie Shotton, Andrew J. Davison, and Andrew Fitzgibbon. 2011. KinectFusion: Real-time dynamic 3D surface reconstruction and interaction. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2011 Talks (SIGGRAPH'11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 23, 1 pages.
[12]
Shaun K. Kane and Jeffrey P. Bigham. 2014. Tracking @stemxcomet: Teaching programming to blind students via 3D printing, crisis management, and twitter. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE'14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 247--252.
[13]
Adam Kemp. 2013. The Makerspace Workbench: Tools, Technologies, and Techniques for Making. Sebastopol, CA: Maker Media.
[14]
Dennis Krannich, Bernard Robben, and Sabrina Wilske. 2012. Digital fabrication for educational contexts. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC’12). New York, NY: ACM Press, 375--376.
[15]
Ben Leduc-Mills, Jaymes Dec, and John Schimmel. 2013. Evaluating accessibility in fabrication tools for children. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children -- (IDC’13). New York, NY: ACM Press, 617--620.
[16]
Ben Leduc-mills and Michael Eisenberg. 2011. The UCube: A child-friendly device for introductory three-dimensional design. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC’11). 72--80.
[17]
Sylvia Libow Martinez and Gary Stager. 2013. Invent to Learn: Making, Tinkering, and Engineering in the Classroom. Constructing Modern Knowledge Press, Torrence, CA.
[18]
Robert Lutz. 2013. Enhancing information technology education (ITE) with the use of 3D printer technology. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM SIGITE Conference on Information Technology Education (SIGITE'13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 157--158.
[19]
Andrew Manches and Claire O’Malley. 2011. Tangibles for learning: A representational analysis of physical manipulation. Persaonl Ubiquitous Computing 16, 4 (July 2011), 405--419.
[20]
Minifacture. 2013. Adjustable Bottle Cap Opener / Cap Wrench. (2013). Retrieved January 20, 2015, from http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:40131.
[21]
National Science Foundation. 2013. Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: Special Report NSF 13-304.
[22]
Irene Posch and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2011. First steps in the FabLab: Experiences engaging children. In Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference (OzCHI’12). 497--500.
[23]
David Rose, Anne Meyer, and Nicole Strangman. 2002. Teaching Every Student in the Digital Age: Universal Design for Learning. Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
[24]
Tides Center. 2014. Maker Education Initiative. Retrieved from www.makered.org.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A transversal and practical education as a business success factor: literature review of learning process of basic design through ICT toolsJournal of Management and Business Education10.35564/jmbe.2024.00057:1(70-89)Online publication date: 13-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Cross-cultural examination of 3D modelling and 3D printing in STEAM education: comparing results from teachers in Montenegro and AustriaLondon Review of Education10.14324/LRE.22.1.1222:1Online publication date: 24-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Making STEM Accessible for Students With Visual Impairments: Implications for PracticeTEACHING Exceptional Children10.1177/00400599241231211Online publication date: 28-Mar-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Investigating the Implications of 3D Printing in Special Education

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing
    ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing  Volume 8, Issue 3
    Special Issue (Part 2) of Papers from ASSETS 2014
    May 2016
    105 pages
    ISSN:1936-7228
    EISSN:1936-7236
    DOI:10.1145/2905052
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 18 March 2016
    Accepted: 01 December 2015
    Revised: 01 August 2015
    Received: 01 March 2015
    Published in TACCESS Volume 8, Issue 3

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. 3D printing
    2. assistive technology
    3. children
    4. cognitive impairment
    5. developmental disability
    6. digital fabrication
    7. rapid prototyping
    8. special education
    9. visual impairment

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed

    Funding Sources

    • National Science Foundation

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)174
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)19
    Reflects downloads up to 08 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)A transversal and practical education as a business success factor: literature review of learning process of basic design through ICT toolsJournal of Management and Business Education10.35564/jmbe.2024.00057:1(70-89)Online publication date: 13-Feb-2024
    • (2024)Cross-cultural examination of 3D modelling and 3D printing in STEAM education: comparing results from teachers in Montenegro and AustriaLondon Review of Education10.14324/LRE.22.1.1222:1Online publication date: 24-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Making STEM Accessible for Students With Visual Impairments: Implications for PracticeTEACHING Exceptional Children10.1177/00400599241231211Online publication date: 28-Mar-2024
    • (2024)Exploring the Potential of Generative AI in DIY Assistive Technology Design by Occupational TherapistsProceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3663548.3688506(1-6)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
    • (2024)The Effect of Orientation on the Readability and Comfort of 3D-Printed BrailleProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642719(1-15)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Assistive Technology Uses and Barriers in the Home and Workplace for Adults With Intellectual and Developmental DisabilitiesJournal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities10.1111/jar.1330638:1Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Archi-TangiBlock: A Modular Block Based Tangible Media as a CAD Tool for Visually Impaired PeopleIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.338231112(46582-46595)Online publication date: 2024
    • (2024)Do years of teaching experience matter in maker teacher professional development? K-12 teachers’ knowledge, attitudes, and design of maker lessonsJournal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education10.1080/21532974.2024.234505540:2(115-138)Online publication date: May-2024
    • (2024)Visualizations and pictures for the visually impaired and its connection to STEM educationJournal of Mathematics and the Arts10.1080/17513472.2024.236508618:1-2(6-18)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2024
    • (2024)3D printing as assistive technology for individuals with deafblindness: perspectives of rehabilitation professionalsDisability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology10.1080/17483107.2024.2431630(1-14)Online publication date: 21-Nov-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media