Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2872427.2883053acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Predicting Pre-click Quality for Native Advertisements

Published: 11 April 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Native advertising is a specific form of online advertising where ads replicate the look-and-feel of their serving platform. In such context, providing a good user experience with the served ads is crucial to ensure long-term user engagement. In this work, we explore the notion of ad quality, namely the effectiveness of advertising from a user experience perspective. We design a learning framework to predict the pre-click quality of native ads. More specifically, we look at detecting offensive native ads, showing that, to quantify ad quality, ad offensive user feedback rates are more reliable than the commonly used click-through rate metrics. We then conduct a crowd-sourcing study to identify which criteria drive user preferences in native advertising. We translate these criteria into a set of ad quality features that we extract from the ad text, image and advertiser, and then use them to train a model able to identify offensive ads. We show that our model is very effective in detecting offensive ads, and provide in-depth insights on how different features affect ad quality. Finally, we deploy a preliminary version of such model and show its effectiveness in the reduction of the offensive ad feedback rate.

References

[1]
J. Attenberg, S. Pandey, and T. Suel. Modeling and predicting user behavior in sponsored search. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 1067--1076. ACM, 2009.
[2]
J. P. Benway. Banner blindness: The irony of attention grabbing on the world wide web. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, volume 42, pages 463--467. SAGE Publications, 1998.
[3]
N. V. Chawla, K. W. Bowyer, L. O. Hall, and W. P. Kegelmeyer. Smote: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. Journal of artificial intelligence research, pages 321--357, 2002.
[4]
H. Cheng, R. v. Zwol, J. Azimi, E. Manavoglu, R. Zhang, Y. Zhou, and V. Navalpakkam. Multimedia features for click prediction of new ads in display advertising. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 777--785. ACM, 2012.
[5]
H. Cramer. Effects of ad quality and content-relevance on perceived content quality. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '15, pages 2231--2234, 2015.
[6]
N. Dalal and B. Triggs. Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2005. CVPR 2005. IEEE Computer Society Conference on, volume 1, pages 886--893. IEEE, 2005.
[7]
R. Datta, D. Joshi, J. Li, and J. Z. Wang. Studying aesthetics in photographic images using a computational approach. In European Conference on Computer Vision, volume 3953 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 288--301. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006.
[8]
K. Dave and V. Varma. Computational Advertising: Techniques for Targeting Relevant Ads. now Publishers, 2014.
[9]
N. Djuric, J. Zhou, R. Morris, M. Grbovic, V. Radosavljevic, and N. Bhamidipati. Hate speech detection with comment embeddings. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion, pages 29--30. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 2015.
[10]
A. Goldfarb and C. Tucker. Online display advertising: Targeting and obtrusiveness. Marketing Science, 30(3):389--404, 2011.
[11]
D. G. Goldstein, R. P. McAfee, and S. Suri. The cost of annoying ads. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web, pages 459--470. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 2013.
[12]
M. Hammami, Y. Chahir, and L. Chen. Webguard: Web based adult content detection and filtering system. In Web Intelligence, 2003. WI 2003. Proceedings. IEEE/WIC International Conference on, pages 574--578. IEEE, 2003.
[13]
F. Heylighen and J.-M. Dewaele. Formality of language: definition, measurement and behavioral determinants. Interner Bericht, Center "Leo Apostel", Vrije Universiteit Brüssel, 1999.
[14]
D. Hillard, S. Schroedl, E. Manavoglu, H. Raghavan, and C. Leggetter. Improving ad relevance in sponsored search. In Proceedings of the third ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, pages 361--370. ACM, 2010.
[15]
X. Hou and L. Zhang. Saliency detection: A spectral residual approach. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2007. CVPR'07. IEEE Conference on, pages 1--8. IEEE, 2007.
[16]
S. IPG. Native ad research from ipg & sharethrough reveals that in-feed beats banners. In Industrial report, http://bit.ly/1QvB387, 2015.
[17]
R. Koenker. Quantile regression. Number 38. Cambridge university press, 2005.
[18]
M. Lalmas, J. Lehmann, G. Shaked, F. Silvestri, and G. Tolomei. Promoting positive post-click experience for in-stream yahoo gemini users. In KDD'15 Industry Track. ACM, 2015.
[19]
K.-c. Lee, B. Orten, A. Dasdan, and W. Li. Estimating conversion rate in display advertising from past erformance data. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 768--776. ACM, 2012.
[20]
T.-Y. Liu. Learning to rank for information retrieval. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 3(3):225--331, 2009.
[21]
T.-Y. Liu, Y. Yang, H. Wan, H.-J. Zeng, Z. Chen, and W.-Y. Ma. Support vector machines classification with a very large-scale taxonomy. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 7(1):36--43, 2005.
[22]
J. Machajdik and A. Hanbury. Affective image classification using features inspired by psychology and art theory. In Proceedings of the international conference on Multimedia, pages 83--92. ACM, 2010.
[23]
K. Mo, B. Liu, L. Xiao, Y. Li, and J. Jiang. Image feature learning for cold start problem in display advertising. In IJCAI'15 Machine Learning Track, 2015.
[24]
H. L. O'Brien and E. G. Toms. The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(1):50--69, 2010.
[25]
K. O'Donnell and H. Cramer. People's perceptions of personalized ads. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion, pages 1293--1298. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 2015.
[26]
L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd. The pagerank citation ranking: bringing order to the web. 1999.
[27]
M. Redi, N. Rasiwasia, G. Aggarwal, and A. Jaimes. The beauty of capturing faces: Rating the quality of digital portraits. In IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition 2015. IEEE, 2015.
[28]
M. Richardson, E. Dominowska, and R. Ragno. Predicting clicks: estimating the click-through rate for new ads. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 521--530. ACM, 2007.
[29]
C. X. Ries and R. Lienhart. A survey on visual adult image recognition. Multimedia tools and applications, 69(3):661--688, 2014.
[30]
M. Sanderson, M. L. Paramita, P. Clough, and E. Kanoulas. Do user preferences and evaluation measures line up? In Proceedings of the 33rd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 555--562. ACM, 2010.
[31]
F. Scholer, D. Kelly, W.-C. Wu, H. S. Lee, and W. Webber. The effect of threshold priming and need for cognition on relevance calibration and assessment. In Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 623--632. ACM, 2013.
[32]
N. Spirin and J. Han. Survey on web spam detection: principles and algorithms. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 13(2):50--64, 2012.
[33]
Y. R. Tausczik and J. W. Pennebaker. The psychological meaning of words: Liwc and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of language and social psychology, 29(1):24--54, 2010.
[34]
M. Thelwall, K. Buckley, G. Paltoglou, D. Cai, and A. Kappas. Sentiment strength detection in short informal text. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12):2544--2558, 2010.
[35]
C. Wang, A. Kalra, C. Borcea, and Y. Chen. Viewability prediction for online display ads. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 413--422. ACM, 2015.
[36]
T. Wang, J. Bian, S. Liu, Y. Zhang, and T.-Y. Liu. Psychological advertising: exploring user psychology for click prediction in sponsored search. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 563--571. ACM, 2013.
[37]
Z. Wang, H. R. Sheikh, and A. C. Bovik. No-reference perceptual quality assessment of jpeg compressed images. In Image Processing. 2002. Proceedings. 2002 International Conference on, volume 1, pages I--477. IEEE, 2002.
[38]
V. Wu, R. Manmatha, and E. M. Riseman. Textfinder: An automatic system to detect and recognize text in images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence, (11):1224--1229, 1999.
[39]
C. Yun Yoo and K. Kim. Processing of animation in online banner advertising: The roles of cognitive and emotional responses. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19(4):18--34, 2005.
[40]
Y. Zhu, G. Wang, J. Yang, D. Wang, J. Yan, J. Hu, and Z. Chen. Optimizing search engine revenue in sponsored search. In Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 588--595. ACM, 2009.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)DeepPvisit: A Deep Survival Model for Notification ManagementCompanion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202310.1145/3543873.3587666(973-977)Online publication date: 30-Apr-2023
  • (2023)Multi-View Multi-Task Campaign Embedding for Cold-Start Conversion Rate ForecastingIEEE Transactions on Big Data10.1109/TBDATA.2022.31621509:1(280-293)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2023
  • (2021)User Response Prediction in Online AdvertisingACM Computing Surveys10.1145/344666254:3(1-43)Online publication date: 8-May-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Predicting Pre-click Quality for Native Advertisements

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    WWW '16: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web
    April 2016
    1482 pages
    ISBN:9781450341431

    Sponsors

    • IW3C2: International World Wide Web Conference Committee

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee

    Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland

    Publication History

    Published: 11 April 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. ad feedback
    2. ad quality
    3. features
    4. image and text
    5. native advertising
    6. offensive rate
    7. pre-click experience

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    WWW '16
    Sponsor:
    • IW3C2
    WWW '16: 25th International World Wide Web Conference
    April 11 - 15, 2016
    Québec, Montréal, Canada

    Acceptance Rates

    WWW '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 115 of 727 submissions, 16%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)21
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 08 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)DeepPvisit: A Deep Survival Model for Notification ManagementCompanion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202310.1145/3543873.3587666(973-977)Online publication date: 30-Apr-2023
    • (2023)Multi-View Multi-Task Campaign Embedding for Cold-Start Conversion Rate ForecastingIEEE Transactions on Big Data10.1109/TBDATA.2022.31621509:1(280-293)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2023
    • (2021)User Response Prediction in Online AdvertisingACM Computing Surveys10.1145/344666254:3(1-43)Online publication date: 8-May-2021
    • (2021)Investigating the Influence of Ads on User Search Performance, Behaviour, and Experience during Information SeekingProceedings of the 2021 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval10.1145/3406522.3446024(107-117)Online publication date: 14-Mar-2021
    • (2021)Generating Actionable Interpretations from Ensembles of Decision TreesIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2019.294532633:4(1540-1553)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2021
    • (2020)Personalising and Diversifying the Listening ExperienceProceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGIR on International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval10.1145/3409256.3410464(3-3)Online publication date: 14-Sep-2020
    • (2020)Tutorial on Online User EngagementProceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining10.1145/3394486.3406472(3551-3552)Online publication date: 23-Aug-2020
    • (2020)Sponsored content and user engagement dynamics on InstagramProceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing10.1145/3341105.3373956(1835-1842)Online publication date: 30-Mar-2020
    • (2020)Leveraging User Email Actions to Improve Ad-Close PredictionProceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management10.1145/3340531.3412093(2293-2296)Online publication date: 19-Oct-2020
    • (2020)Ad Close Mitigation for Improved User Experience in Native AdvertisementsProceedings of the 13th International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/3336191.3371798(546-554)Online publication date: 20-Jan-2020
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media