Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2899015.2899020acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesasia-ccsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Simulation Study on Smart Grid Resilience under Software-Defined Networking Controller Failures

Published: 30 May 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Riding on the success of SDN for enterprise and data center networks, recently researchers have shown much interest in applying SDN for critical infrastructures. A key concern, however, is the vulnerability of the SDN controller as a single point of failure. In this paper, we develop a cyber-physical simulation platform that interconnects Mininet (an SDN emulator), hardware SDN switches, and PowerWorld (a high-fidelity, industry-strength power grid simulator). We report initial experiments on how a number of representative controller faults may impact the delay of smart grid communications. We further evaluate how this delay may affect the performance of the underlying physical system, namely automatic gain control (AGC) as a fundamental closed-loop control that regulates the grid frequency to a critical nominal value. Our results show that when the fault-induced delay reaches seconds (e.g., more than four seconds in some of our experiments), degradation of the AGC becomes evident. Particularly, the AGC is most vulnerable when it is in a transient following say step changes in loading, because the significant state fluctuations will exacerbate the effects of using a stale system state in the control.

References

[1]
RPyC. https://rpyc.readthedocs.org/en/latest/.
[2]
Homa Alemzadeh, Daniel Chen, Andrew Lewis, Zbigniew Kalbarczyk, Jaishankar Raman, Nancy Leveson, and Ravishankar Iyer. Systems-theoretic safety assessment of robotic telesurgical systems. In 34th International Conference on Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security (SAFECOMP), 2015.
[3]
Adam Cahn, Jose Hoyos, Matthew Hulse, and Eric Keller. Software-defined energy communication networks: From substation automation to future smart grids. In Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm), 2013 IEEE International Conference on, pages 558--563. IEEE, 2013.
[4]
Advait Abhay Dixit, Fang Hao, Sarit Mukherjee, T.V. Lakshman, and Ramana Kompella. Elasticon: An elastic distributed SDN controller. In Proceedings of the Tenth ACM/IEEE Symposium on Architectures for Networking and Communications Systems, ANCS '14, 2014.
[5]
Xinshu Dong, Hui Lin, Rui Tan, Ravishankar K. Iyer, and Zbigniew Kalbarczyk. Software-defined networking for smart grid resilience: Opportunities and challenges. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM Workshop on Cyber-Physical System Security, CPSS '15, 2015.
[6]
Nils Dorsch, Fabian Kurtz, Hanno Georg, Christian Hagerling, and Christian Wietfeld. Software-defined networking for smart grid communications: Applications, challenges and advantages. In Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm), 2014 IEEE International Conference on, pages 422--427. IEEE, 2014.
[7]
Andrew Goodney, Sudhakar Kumar, Adit Ravi, and Young H Cho. Efficient PMU networking with software defined networks. In Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm), 2013 IEEE International Conference on, pages 378--383. IEEE, 2013.
[8]
V.C. Gungor, D. Sahin, T. Kocak, S. Ergut, C. Buccella, C. Cecati, and G.P. Hancke. A survey on smart grid potential applications and communication requirements. Industrial Informatics, IEEE Transactions on, 9(1):28--42, Feb 2013.
[9]
Sushant Jain, Alok Kumar, Subhasree Mandal, Joon Ong, Leon Poutievski, Arjun Singh, Subbaiah Venkata, Jim Wanderer, Junlan Zhou, Min Zhu, Jon Zolla, Urs Hölzle, Stephen Stuart, and Amin Vahdat. B4: Experience with a globally-deployed software defined WAN. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2013 Conference on SIGCOMM, SIGCOMM '13, 2013.
[10]
Ryan Johnston, Carl H Hauser, K Harald Gjermundrod, and David E Bakken. Distributing time-synchronous phasor measurement data using the GridStat communication infrastructure. In System Sciences, 2006. HICSS'06. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on, volume 10, pages 245b--245b. IEEE, 2006.
[11]
Naga Katta, Haoyu Zhang, Michael Freedman, and Jennifer Rexford. Ravana: Controller fault-tolerance in software-defined networking. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCOMM Symposium on Software Defined Networking Research, SOSR '15, 2015.
[12]
Young-Jin Kim, Keqiang He, Marina Thottan, and Jayant G Deshpande. Virtualized and self-configurable utility communications enabled by software-defined networks. In Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm), 2014 IEEE International Conference on, pages 416--421. IEEE, 2014.
[13]
Prabha Kundur, Neal J Balu, and Mark G Lauby. Power system stability and control, volume 7. McGraw-hill New York, 1994.
[14]
Maciej Kuzniar, Peter Perešíni, Nedeljko Vasić, Marco Canini, and Dejan Kostić. Automatic failure recovery for software-defined networks. In Proceedings of the Second ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Hot Topics in Software Defined Networking, HotSDN '13, 2013.
[15]
Elias Molina, Eduardo Jacob, Jon Matias, Naiara Moreira, and Armando Astarloa. Using software defined networking to manage and control IEC 61850-based systems. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 2014.
[16]
Hoang Hai Nguyen, Rui Tan, and David KY Yau. Safety-assured collaborative load management in smart grids. In ACM/IEEE 5th International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems, pages 151--162. IEEE Computer Society, 2014.
[17]
B.A.A. Nunes, M. Mendonca, Xuan-Nam Nguyen, K. Obraczka, and T. Turletti. A survey of software-defined networking: Past, present, and future of programmable networks. Communications Surveys Tutorials, IEEE, 16(3):1617--1634, 2014.
[18]
SANS ICS. Confirmation of a coordinated attack on the Ukrainian power grid. https://ics.sans.org/blog/2016/01/09/confirmation-of-a-coordinated-attack\newline-on-the-ukrainian-power-grid, 2016.
[19]
Seungwon Shin, Yongjoo Song, Taekyung Lee, Sangho Lee, Jaewoong Chung, Phillip Porras, Vinod Yegneswaran, Jiseong Noh, and Brent Byunghoon Kang. Rosemary: A robust, secure, and high-performance network operating system. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, CCS '14, pages 78--89, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM.
[20]
Seungwon Shin, Vinod Yegneswaran, Phillip Porras, and Guofei Gu. Avant-guard: Scalable and vigilant switch flow management in software-defined networks. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, CCS '13, 2013.
[21]
Ali Sydney, James Nutaro, Caterina Scoglio, Don Gruenbacher, and Noel Schulz. Simulative comparison of multiprotocol label switching and OpenFlow network technologies for transmission operations. Smart Grid, IEEE Transactions on, 4(2):763--770, 2013.
[22]
Ali Sydney, David S Ochs, Caterina Scoglio, Don Gruenbacher, and Ruth Miller. Using GENI for experimental evaluation of software defined networking in smart grids. Computer Networks, 63:5--16, 2014.
[23]
A. Zarek. OpenFlow timeouts demystified. Master's thesis, University of Toronto, 2012.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Decentralized Smart Grid Communication Framework Using SDN-Enabled Blockchain2024 IEEE 21st Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC)10.1109/CCNC51664.2024.10454835(982-985)Online publication date: 6-Jan-2024
  • (2023)XAI for Maintainability Prediction of Software-Defined NetworksProceedings of the 24th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking10.1145/3571306.3571443(402-406)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2023
  • (2023)Dynamic Data-Driven Approach for Cyber-Resilient and Secure Critical Energy SystemsHandbook of Dynamic Data Driven Applications Systems10.1007/978-3-031-27986-7_31(807-831)Online publication date: 6-Sep-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CPSS '16: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Workshop on Cyber-Physical System Security
May 2016
102 pages
ISBN:9781450342889
DOI:10.1145/2899015
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 30 May 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. attacks
  2. faults
  3. smart grid
  4. software-defined networking

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

  • Department of Energy, USA
  • Singapore's Agency for Science, Technology and Research (AÆSTAR)
  • National Science Foundation, USA

Conference

ASIA CCS '16
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

CPSS '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 8 of 28 submissions, 29%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 43 of 135 submissions, 32%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Decentralized Smart Grid Communication Framework Using SDN-Enabled Blockchain2024 IEEE 21st Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC)10.1109/CCNC51664.2024.10454835(982-985)Online publication date: 6-Jan-2024
  • (2023)XAI for Maintainability Prediction of Software-Defined NetworksProceedings of the 24th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking10.1145/3571306.3571443(402-406)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2023
  • (2023)Dynamic Data-Driven Approach for Cyber-Resilient and Secure Critical Energy SystemsHandbook of Dynamic Data Driven Applications Systems10.1007/978-3-031-27986-7_31(807-831)Online publication date: 6-Sep-2023
  • (2022)Securing SDN-Enabled Smart Power GridsResearch Anthology on Smart Grid and Microgrid Development10.4018/978-1-6684-3666-0.ch046(1028-1046)Online publication date: 2022
  • (2022)Failure and fault classification for smart gridsEnergy Informatics10.1186/s42162-022-00218-35:1Online publication date: 20-Oct-2022
  • (2022)FogAI: An AI-supported fog controller for Next Generation IoTInternet of Things10.1016/j.iot.2022.10057219(100572)Online publication date: Aug-2022
  • (2021)The Virtualized Cyber-Physical Testbed for Machine Learning Anomaly Detection: A Wind Powered Grid Case StudyIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2021.31271699(159475-159494)Online publication date: 2021
  • (2020)Modeling and processing of smart grids big data: study case of a university research buildingDecision Making Applications in Modern Power Systems10.1016/B978-0-12-816445-7.00019-0(507-538)Online publication date: 2020
  • (2019)Learning from Sets of Items in Recommender SystemsACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems10.1145/33261289:4(1-26)Online publication date: 25-Jul-2019
  • (2019)Non-Intrusive Deployment of Blockchain in Establishing Cyber-Infrastructure for Smart City2019 16th Annual IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networking (SECON)10.1109/SAHCN.2019.8824921(1-6)Online publication date: Jun-2019
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media