Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2908131.2908176acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebsciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Social machines in practice: solutions, stakeholders and scopes

Published: 22 May 2016 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    This paper frames social machines as problem solving entities, demonstrating how their ecosystems address multiple stakeholders' problems. It enumerates aspects relevant to the theory and real-world practice of social machines, based on qualitative observations from our experiences building them. We frame evolving issues including: changing functionality, users, data and context; geographical and temporal scope (considering data granularity and visibility); and social scope. The latter is wide-ranging, including motivation, trust, experience, security, governance, control, provenance, privacy and law. We provide suggestions about building flexibility into social machines to allow for change, and defining social machines in terms of problems and stakeholders.

    References

    [1]
    von Ahn, L., Maurer, B., McMillen, C., Abraham, D. and Blum, M. 2008. reCAPTCHA: Human-Based Character Recognition via Web Security Measures. Science. 321, 5895, 465--1468. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1160379
    [2]
    Berners-Lee, T. and Fischetti, M. 1999. Weaving the web: The original design and ultimate destiny of the World Wide Web by its inventor. Harper, San Francisco
    [3]
    Churchman, C. W., Guest Editorial, Management Science, Vol. 14, No. 4 (December 1967)
    [4]
    Easley, D., & Kleinberg, J. (2010). Networks, crowds, and markets: Reasoning about a highly connected world. Cambridge University Press.
    [5]
    Hendler, J., & Berners-Lee, T. (2010). From the Semantic Web to social machines: A research challenge for AI on the World Wide Web. Artificial Intelligence, 174(2), 156--161.
    [6]
    Hooper, C. J. and Millard, D. E. (2010) Teasing Apart and Piecing Together: Towards Understanding Web-based Interactions. In: Web Science 2010, Raleigh, USA.
    [7]
    Hooper, C. J., Nind, M., Parsons, S., Power, A., Collis, A. (2015) Building a Social Machine: Co-designing a TimeBank for Inclusive Research. In: Proceedings of ACM Web Science 2015, Oxford, UK.
    [8]
    Hooper, C. J., Pickering, J. B., Prichard, J., Ashleigh, M. (2015) TRIFoRM Final Report: TRust in IT: Factors, metRics, Models. 2015. IT as a Utility Network.
    [9]
    Kalogiros, C., Courcoubetis, C., Stamoulis, G. D., Boniface, M., Meyer, E. T.,. .. & Stiller, B. (2011). An approach to investigating socio-economic tussles arising from building the future internet (pp. 145--159). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
    [10]
    Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin UK.
    [11]
    Passani, A., Monacciani, F., Van Der Graaf, S., Spagnoli, F., Bellini, F., Debicki, M., & Dini, P. (2014). SEQUOIA: A methodology for the socio-economic impact assessment of Software-as-a-Service and Internet of Services research projects. Research Evaluation, 23(2), 133--149.
    [12]
    De Roure, D., Hooper, C. J., Meredith-Lobay, M., Page, K., Tarte, S., Cruickshank, D. and De Roure, C. 2013. Observing Social Machines part 1: what to observe?. In 22nd international conference on World Wide Web companion (WWW '13 Companion). Geneva, Switzerland, 901--904
    [13]
    De Roure, D., Hooper, C. J., Page, K., Tarte, S., Willcox, P. (2015) Observing Social Machines Part 2: How to Observe? In: Proceedings of ACM Web Science 2015, Oxford, UK.
    [14]
    Shadbolt, N. R., Smith, D. A., Simperl, E., Van Kleek, M., Yang, Y., & Hall, W. (2013, May). Towards a classification framework for social machines. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web companion (pp. 905--912).
    [15]
    Tinati, R., Luczak-Roesch, M., Simperl, E., & Shadbolt, N. (2014, June). Motivations of citizen scientists: A quantitative investigation of forum participation. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM conference on Web science (pp. 295--296). ACM.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2021)Applying mechanical philosophy to web science: The case of social machinesEuropean Journal for Philosophy of Science10.1007/s13194-021-00388-z11:3Online publication date: 19-Jul-2021
    • (2020)Ontology of Social Machines2020 15th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI)10.23919/CISTI49556.2020.9140830(1-4)Online publication date: Jun-2020
    • (2020)Evolution of the Web of Social Machines: A Systematic Review and Research ChallengesIEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems10.1109/TCSS.2019.29612697:2(373-388)Online publication date: Apr-2020
    • Show More Cited By

    Index Terms

    1. Social machines in practice: solutions, stakeholders and scopes

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      WebSci '16: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Web Science
      May 2016
      392 pages
      ISBN:9781450342087
      DOI:10.1145/2908131
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 22 May 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. linked data
      2. social machines
      3. stakeholders

      Qualifiers

      • Short-paper

      Funding Sources

      • EPSRC

      Conference

      WebSci '16
      Sponsor:
      WebSci '16: ACM Web Science Conference
      May 22 - 25, 2016
      Hannover, Germany

      Acceptance Rates

      WebSci '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 13 of 70 submissions, 19%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 245 of 933 submissions, 26%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 12 Aug 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2021)Applying mechanical philosophy to web science: The case of social machinesEuropean Journal for Philosophy of Science10.1007/s13194-021-00388-z11:3Online publication date: 19-Jul-2021
      • (2020)Ontology of Social Machines2020 15th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI)10.23919/CISTI49556.2020.9140830(1-4)Online publication date: Jun-2020
      • (2020)Evolution of the Web of Social Machines: A Systematic Review and Research ChallengesIEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems10.1109/TCSS.2019.29612697:2(373-388)Online publication date: Apr-2020
      • (2018)Where the smart things are: social machines and the Internet of ThingsPhenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences10.1007/s11097-018-9583-xOnline publication date: 17-Jul-2018
      • (2017)LBSociamProceedings of the 9th International Conference on Management of Digital EcoSystems10.1145/3167020.3167045(162-167)Online publication date: 7-Nov-2017

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media