Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2910017.2910633acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
demonstration

Ultra-low delay for all: live experience, live analysis

Published: 10 May 2016 Publication History

Abstract

This demo dramatically illustrates how replacing 'Classic' TCP congestion control (Reno, Cubic, etc.) with a 'Scalable' alternative like Data Centre TCP (DCTCP) keeps queuing delay ultra-low; not just for a select few light applications like voice or gaming, but even when a variety of interactive applications all heavily load the same (emulated) Internet access. DCTCP has so far been confined to data centres because it is too aggressive---it starves Classic TCP flows. To allow DCTCP to be exploited on the public Internet, we developed DualQ Coupled Active Queue Management (AQM), which allows the two TCP types to safely co-exist. Visitors can test all these claims. As well as running Web-based apps, they can pan and zoom a panoramic video of a football stadium on a touch-screen, and experience how their personalized HD scene seems to stick to their finger, even though it is encoded on the fly on servers accessed via an emulated delay, representing 'the cloud'. A pair of VR goggles can be used at the same time, making a similar point. The demo provides a dashboard so that visitors can not only experience the interactivity of each application live, but they can also quantify it via a wide range of performance stats, updated live. It also includes controls so visitors can configure different TCP variants, AQMs, network parameters and background loads and immediately test the effect.

References

[1]
iPerf - The network bandwidth measurement tool.
[2]
M. Alizadeh, A. Greenberg, D. A. Maltz, J. Padhye, P. Patel, B. Prabhakar, S. Sengupta, and M. Sridharan. Data Center TCP (DCTCP). In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2010 Conference, SIGCOMM '10, pages 63--74, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
[3]
S. Blake, D. Black, M. Carlson, E. Davies, Z. Wang, and W. Weiss. An Architecture for Differentiated Services. RFC 2475, RFC Editor, Dec. 1998.
[4]
B. Briscoe, A. Brunstrom, A. Petlund, D. Hayes, D. Ros, I.-J. Tsang, S. Gjessing, G. Fairhurst, C. Griwodz, and M. Welzl. Reducing Internet Latency: A Survey of Techniques and their Merits. Communications Surveys Tutorials, IEEE, PP(99):1--1, 2014.
[5]
Y. Choi, J. A. Silvester, and H.-c. Kim. Analyzing and Modeling Workload Characteristics in a Multiservice IP Network. Internet Computing, IEEE, 15(2):35--42, March 2011.
[6]
K. De Schepper, B. Briscoe, O. Bondarenko, and I.-J. Tsang. DualQ Coupled AQM for Low Latency, Low Loss and Scalable Throughput. Internet Draft draft-briscoe-aqm-dualq-coupled-00, IETF, Aug. 2015. (Work in Progress).
[7]
T. Hoeiland-Joergensen, P. McKenney, D. Täht, J. Gettys, and E. Dumazet. Flowqueue-codel. Internet Draft draft-ietf-aqm-fq-codel-04, work in progress, June 2014.
[8]
O. Hohlfeld, E. Pujol, F. Ciucu, A. Feldmann, and P. Barford. A QoE Perspective on Sizing Network Buffers. In Proc. Internet Measurement Conf (IMC'14), pages 333--346. ACM, Nov. 2014.
[9]
M. Nilsson, B. Crabtree, P. Mulroy, and S. Appleby. Equitable quality video streaming for IP networks. International Journal of Internet Protocol Technology, 4(1):65--76, Mar. 2009.
[10]
R. Pan, P. Natarajan, C. Piglione, M. S. Prabhu, V. Subramanian, F. Baker, and B. VerSteeg. PIE: A lightweight control scheme to address the bufferbloat problem. In Proc. IEEE 14th Int'l Conf. on High Performance Switching and Routing (HPSR), pages 148--155, 2013.
[11]
K. K. Ramakrishnan, S. Floyd, and D. Black. The Addition of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) to IP. RFC 3168, RFC Editor, Sept. 2001.
[12]
L. Stewart, D. A. Hayes, G. Armitage, M. Welzl, and A. Petlund. Multimedia-unfriendly TCP Congestion Control and Home Gateway Queue Management. In Proc. 2nd annual Conference on Multimedia Systems (MMSys'11), pages 35--44. ACM, 2011.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Improving Cloud Gaming Traffic QoS: A Comparison Between Class-Based Queuing Policy and L4S2024 8th Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA)10.23919/TMA62044.2024.10558920(1-10)Online publication date: 21-May-2024
  • (2021)Playing chunk-transferred DASH segments at low latency with QLiveProceedings of the 12th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference10.1145/3458305.3463376(51-64)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2021
  • (2021)Core-Stateless Forwarding With QoS Revisited: Decoupling Delay and Bandwidth RequirementsIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking10.1109/TNET.2020.304123529:2(503-516)Online publication date: Apr-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
MMSys '16: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Multimedia Systems
May 2016
420 pages
ISBN:9781450342971
DOI:10.1145/2910017
  • General Chair:
  • Christian Timmerer
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 10 May 2016

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Demonstration

Funding Sources

  • RITE

Conference

MMSys'16
Sponsor:
MMSys'16: Multimedia Systems Conference 2016
May 10 - 13, 2016
Klagenfurt, Austria

Acceptance Rates

MMSys '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 20 of 71 submissions, 28%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 176 of 530 submissions, 33%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Improving Cloud Gaming Traffic QoS: A Comparison Between Class-Based Queuing Policy and L4S2024 8th Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA)10.23919/TMA62044.2024.10558920(1-10)Online publication date: 21-May-2024
  • (2021)Playing chunk-transferred DASH segments at low latency with QLiveProceedings of the 12th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference10.1145/3458305.3463376(51-64)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2021
  • (2021)Core-Stateless Forwarding With QoS Revisited: Decoupling Delay and Bandwidth RequirementsIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking10.1109/TNET.2020.304123529:2(503-516)Online publication date: Apr-2021
  • (2020)A Congestion Control Independent L4S SchedulerProceedings of the Applied Networking Research Workshop on ZZZ10.1145/3404868.3406669(45-51)Online publication date: 27-Jul-2020
  • (2018)Delay-Sensitive Video Computing in the CloudACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications10.1145/321280414:3s(1-29)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2018
  • (2018)On the Minimization of Glass-to-Glass and Glass-to-Algorithm Delay in Video CommunicationIEEE Transactions on Multimedia10.1109/TMM.2017.272618920:1(238-252)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2018
  • (2017)Alternative backoff: Achieving low latency and high throughput with ECN and AQM2017 IFIP Networking Conference (IFIP Networking) and Workshops10.23919/IFIPNetworking.2017.8264863(1-9)Online publication date: Jun-2017
  • (2017)Design and Implementation of AQM Evaluation Suite for ns-3Proceedings of the 2017 Workshop on ns-310.1145/3067665.3067674(87-94)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2017
  • (2016)PI2Proceedings of the 12th International on Conference on emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies10.1145/2999572.2999578(105-119)Online publication date: 6-Dec-2016

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media