Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2910896.2910909acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesjcdlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Comparing Published Scientific Journal Articles to Their Pre-print Versions

Published: 19 June 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Academic publishers claim that they add value to scholarly communications by coordinating reviews and contributing and enhancing text during publication. These contributions come at a considerable cost: U.S. academic libraries paid $1.7 billion for serial subscriptions in 2008 alone. Library budgets, in contrast, are flat and not able to keep pace with serial price inflation. We have investigated the publishers' value proposition by conducting a comparative study of pre-print papers and their final published counterparts. This comparison had two working assumptions: 1) if the publishers' argument is valid, the text of a pre-print paper should vary measurably from its corresponding final published version, and 2) by applying standard similarity measures, we should be able to detect and quantify such differences. Our analysis revealed that the text contents of the scientific papers generally changed very little from their pre-print to final published versions. These findings contribute empirical indicators to discussions of the added value of commercial publishers and therefore should influence libraries' economic decisions regarding access to scholarly publications.

References

[1]
B.-C. Björk. Have the "mega-journals" reached the limits to growth? PeerJ, 3:e981, 2015.
[2]
B.-C. Björk, P. Welling, M. Laakso, P. Majlender, T. Hedlund, and G. Guðnason. Open access to the scientific journal literature: Situation 2009. PLoS ONE, 5(6):e11273, 2009.
[3]
L. Bornmann and R. Mutz. Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015.
[4]
P. Jaccard. Etude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des Alpes et du Jura. Impr. Corbaz, 1901.
[5]
H. R. Jamali and M. Nabavi. Open access and sources of full-text articles in Google Scholar in different subject fields. Scientometrics, 105(3):1635--1651, 2015.
[6]
V. I. Levenshtein. Binary Codes Capable of Correcting Deletions, Insertions and Reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady, 10(8):707--710, 1966.
[7]
M. Mabe. (Electronic) Journal Publishing. The E-Resource Management Handbook, 2006.
[8]
Office of Management and Budget (U.S.). Fiscal Year 2014 Analytical Perspectives: Budget of the U.S. Government. Office of Management and Budget, 2013.
[9]
T. Pang-Ning, M. Steinbach, and V. Kumar. Introduction to Data Mining. Pearson Addison Wesley, 2006.
[10]
M. F. Porter. An Algorithm for Suffix Stripping. Electronic Library and Information Systems, 14(3):130--137, 1980.
[11]
T. Sørensen. A Method of Establishing Groups of Equal Amplitude in Plant Sociology Based on Similarity of Species and its Application to Analyses of the Vegetation on Danish Commons. Biol. Skr., 5:1--34, 1948.
[12]
University of California. Accountability Report 2015. http://accountability.universityofcalifornia.edu/2015/chapters/chapter-9.html.
[13]
M. Ware and M. Wabe. The STM Report - An Overview of Scientific and Scholarly Journal Publishing. International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers, 2015.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024) The enhanced research impact of self‐archiving platforms: Evidence from bioRxiv Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/asi.24932Online publication date: 16-Jun-2024
  • (2023)Understanding the Use of e-Prints on Reddit and 4chan’s Politically Incorrect BoardProceedings of the 15th ACM Web Science Conference 202310.1145/3578503.3583627(117-127)Online publication date: 30-Apr-2023
  • (2021)Preprints in Chemistry: An Exploratory Analysis of Differences with Journal ArticlesPublications10.3390/publications90100059:1(5)Online publication date: 3-Feb-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Comparing Published Scientific Journal Articles to Their Pre-print Versions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    JCDL '16: Proceedings of the 16th ACM/IEEE-CS on Joint Conference on Digital Libraries
    June 2016
    316 pages
    ISBN:9781450342292
    DOI:10.1145/2910896
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 19 June 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. open access
    2. pre-print
    3. publishing
    4. similarity

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    JCDL '16
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    JCDL '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 15 of 52 submissions, 29%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 415 of 1,482 submissions, 28%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)42
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
    Reflects downloads up to 26 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024) The enhanced research impact of self‐archiving platforms: Evidence from bioRxiv Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/asi.24932Online publication date: 16-Jun-2024
    • (2023)Understanding the Use of e-Prints on Reddit and 4chan’s Politically Incorrect BoardProceedings of the 15th ACM Web Science Conference 202310.1145/3578503.3583627(117-127)Online publication date: 30-Apr-2023
    • (2021)Preprints in Chemistry: An Exploratory Analysis of Differences with Journal ArticlesPublications10.3390/publications90100059:1(5)Online publication date: 3-Feb-2021
    • (2021)Inferring the causal effect of journals on citationsQuantitative Science Studies10.1162/qss_a_001282:2(496-504)Online publication date: 15-Jul-2021
    • (2021)Cross-sectional study of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 studies: discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretationBMJ Open10.1136/bmjopen-2021-05182111:7(e051821)Online publication date: 16-Jul-2021
    • (2020)Crossref: The sustainable source of community-owned scholarly metadataQuantitative Science Studies10.1162/qss_a_000221:1(414-427)Online publication date: Feb-2020
    • (2019)Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprintseLife10.7554/eLife.451338Online publication date: 24-Apr-2019
    • (2019)Enhancing access to scholarly publications with surrogate resourcesScientometrics10.1007/s11192-019-03227-4121:2(1129-1164)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2019
    • (2018)Is the Abstract a Mere Teaser? Evaluating Generosity of Article Abstracts in the Environmental SciencesFrontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics10.3389/frma.2018.000163Online publication date: 15-May-2018
    • (2017)On the origin of nonequivalent states: How we can talk about preprintsF1000Research10.12688/f1000research.11408.16(608)Online publication date: 2-May-2017

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media