Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2911451.2914716acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Polarized User and Topic Tracking in Twitter

Published: 07 July 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Digital traces of conversations in micro-blogging platforms and OSNs provide information about user opinion with a high degree of resolution. These information sources can be exploited to understand and monitor collective behaviours. In this work, we focus on polarisation classes, i.e., those topics that require the user to side exclusively with one position. The proposed method provides an iterative classification of users and keywords: first, polarised users are identified, then polarised keywords are discovered by monitoring the activities of previously classified users. This method thus allows tracking users and topics over time. We report several experiments conducted on two Twitter datasets during political election time-frames. We measure the user classification accuracy on a golden set of users, and analyse the relevance of the extracted keywords for the ongoing political discussion.

References

[1]
L. A. Adamic and N. Glance. The political blogosphere and the 2004 us election: divided they blog. In Proc. of the 3rd Workshop on Link discovery, pages 36--43. ACM, 2005.
[2]
J. Allan. Topic detection and tracking: event-based information organization, volume 12. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
[3]
M. Coletto, C. Lucchese, S. Orlando, and R. Perego. Electoral predictions with twitter: a machine-learning approach. IIR, 2015.
[4]
K. Garimella, G. De Francisci Morales, A. Gionis, and M. Mathioudakis. Quantifying controversy in social media. In ACM WSDM, pages 33--42, 2016.
[5]
D. Gayo-Avello, P. T. Metaxas, and E. Mustafaraj. Limits of electoral predictions using twitter. In ICWSM, 2011.
[6]
C. V. Gysel, B. Goethals, and M. de Rijke. Determining the presence of political parties in social circles. In AAAI ICWSM, 2015.
[7]
J. Lin, R. Snow, and W. Morgan. Smoothing techniques for adaptive online language models: topic tracking in tweet streams. In ACM SIGKDD, pages 422--429. ACM, 2011.
[8]
A. Makazhanov, D. Rafiei, and M. Waqar. Predicting political preference of twitter users. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 4(1):1--15, 2014.
[9]
M. Mathioudakis and N. Koudas. Twittermonitor: trend detection over the twitter stream. In Proc. of the 2010 ACM SIGMOD, pages 1155--1158. ACM, 2010.
[10]
A. Tumasjan, T. O. Sprenger, P. G. Sandner, and I. M. Welpe. Predicting elections with twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. ICWSM, 10:178--185, 2010.
[11]
F. Walls, H. Jin, S. Sista, and R. Schwartz. Topic detection in broadcast news. In Proceedings of the DARPA broadcast news workshop, pages 193--198, 1999.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The Usage of Twitter (Now đť•Ź) Amplifiers in the European Elections of 2019Journalism and Media10.3390/journalmedia50300605:3(951-966)Online publication date: 12-Jul-2024
  • (2023)The Italian Social Mood on Economy Index During the Covid-19 CrisisStudies in Theoretical and Applied Statistics10.1007/978-3-031-16609-9_29(475-485)Online publication date: 15-Feb-2023
  • (2020)Human migration: the big data perspectiveInternational Journal of Data Science and Analytics10.1007/s41060-020-00213-511:4(341-360)Online publication date: 23-Mar-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGIR '16: Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
July 2016
1296 pages
ISBN:9781450340694
DOI:10.1145/2911451
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 July 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. algorithm
  2. classification
  3. controversy
  4. hashtags
  5. polarization
  6. polarized user
  7. social networks
  8. topic tracking
  9. twitter
  10. user

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper

Funding Sources

  • EC H2020

Conference

SIGIR '16
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

SIGIR '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 62 of 341 submissions, 18%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 792 of 3,983 submissions, 20%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 30 Aug 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The Usage of Twitter (Now đť•Ź) Amplifiers in the European Elections of 2019Journalism and Media10.3390/journalmedia50300605:3(951-966)Online publication date: 12-Jul-2024
  • (2023)The Italian Social Mood on Economy Index During the Covid-19 CrisisStudies in Theoretical and Applied Statistics10.1007/978-3-031-16609-9_29(475-485)Online publication date: 15-Feb-2023
  • (2020)Human migration: the big data perspectiveInternational Journal of Data Science and Analytics10.1007/s41060-020-00213-511:4(341-360)Online publication date: 23-Mar-2020
  • (2018)Social–Spatiotemporal Analysis of Topical and Polarized Communities in Online Social NetworksEncyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_110182(2816-2831)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2018
  • (2017)Modeling Controversy within PopulationsProceedings of the ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval10.1145/3121050.3121067(141-149)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2017
  • (2017)Social–Spatiotemporal Analysis of Topical and Polarized Communities in Online Social NetworksEncyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining10.1007/978-1-4614-7163-9_110182-1(1-16)Online publication date: 10-Oct-2017
  • (2016)Sentiment-enhanced multidimensional analysis of online social networksProceedings of the 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining10.5555/3192424.3192657(1270-1277)Online publication date: 18-Aug-2016
  • (2016)Sentiment-enhanced multidimensional analysis of online social networks: Perception of the mediterranean refugees crisis2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM)10.1109/ASONAM.2016.7752401(1270-1277)Online publication date: Aug-2016

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media