Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2930674.2930723acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesidcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Making as the New Colored Pencil: Translating Elementary Curricula into Maker Activities

Published: 21 June 2016 Publication History

Abstract

We present Making activities designed and observed within the formal environment of elementary school classrooms. Using a collaborative curriculum-matching design process with teachers, 8 Maker activities and lesson plans were developed, and implemented in Science and Language Arts classrooms of a school with a large percentage of students from underrepresented populations, over the course of 18 weeks during one semester. Coded videos revealed three categories of Maker activities: those that enabled learning, demonstrated learning, and provided learning of the concept itself. Experiences of teachers and students also revealed eagerness to participate, engagement, and exploration in the activities, as observed in a series of analyses. Other themes include the importance of multi-sensory exploration and ownership of self-constructed apparatuses with electronics. The resulting Maker activities and lesson plans offer strategies for familiarizing students with electronic tools and fostering tinkering while remaining true to the learning standards of the classroom.

References

[1]
Halverson, E.R. and K.M. Sheridan, The Maker Movement in Education. Harvard Educational Review, 2014. 84(4): p. 495--504.
[2]
Halverson, E.R. and K. Sheridan, The Maker Movement in Education. Harvard Educational Review, 2014. 84(4): p. 495--504.
[3]
Dougherty, D., The Maker Mindset, in Design, Make, Play: Growing the Next Generation of STEM Innovators, M. Honey and D.E. Kanter, Editors. 2013, Routledge. p. 7--11.
[4]
Evertson, C.M., Classroom management for elementary teachers. 1994: ERIC.
[5]
Beyers, R.N., Nurturing creativity and innovation through FabKids: A case study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2010. 19(5): p. 447--455.
[6]
Dewey, J., Education and Experience. 1938/1997, New York: Touchstone.
[7]
Mayer, R.E., Designing instruction for constructivist learning. Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, 1999. 2: p. 141--159.
[8]
Chu, S.L., et al., Enabling Instrumental Interaction Through Electronics Making: Effects on Children's Storytelling, in Interactive Storytelling. 2015, Springer. p. 329--337.
[9]
Resnick, M. and E. Rosenbaum, Designing for tinkerability. Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators, 2013: p. 163--181.
[10]
Posch, I. and G. Fitzpatrick. First steps in the FabLab: experiences engaging children. in Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference. 2012. ACM.
[11]
Flores, C. and T. Springer. Authentic Learning and Assessment in the Self-Directed Environment of a Middle School Maker Space. in Workshop on Digital Fabrication in Education at the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC). 2013. Bremen, Germany.
[12]
Hamner, E., et al. Robot Diaries: Broadening Participation in the Computer Science Pipeline through Social Technical Exploration. in AAAI Spring Symposium: Using AI to Motivate Greater Participation in Computer Science. 2008.
[13]
Hamner, E., T. Lauwers, and D. Bernstein. The Debugging Task: Evaluating a Robotics Design Workshop. in AAAI Spring Symposium: Educational Robotics and Beyond. 2010.
[14]
Qiu, K., et al. A curriculum for teaching computer science through computational textiles. in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. 2013. ACM.
[15]
Alexander, C., et al. Piloting innovative learning experiences: Measuring outcomes of digital fabrication activities across five classes. in Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2013.
[16]
Corno, L. and E.B. Mandinach, What we have learned about student engagement in the past twenty years. Big theories revisited, 2004. 4: p. 299--328.
[17]
http://tea.texas.gov/curriculum/teks/.
[18]
Dougherty, D., An In-depth Profile of Makers at the Forefront of Hardware Innovation, in The Maker Movement is Transforming Business. 2012, Make & Intel.
[19]
Chu, S.L., et al., Making the Maker: A Means-to-an-Ends approach to nurturing the Maker mindset in elementary-aged children. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 2015.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)IF science AND making AND computing: Insights for project-based learning and primary science curriculum designStudies in Science Education10.1080/03057267.2024.2397300(1-65)Online publication date: 19-Sep-2024
  • (2022)Uncovering Children's Situated Design Capital – A Nexus Analytic InquiryProceedings of the 21st Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3501712.3529732(408-421)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2022
  • (2022)Maker Technology and the Promise of Empowerment in a Flemish School for Disabled ChildrenProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3501853(1-18)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Making as the New Colored Pencil: Translating Elementary Curricula into Maker Activities

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    IDC '16: Proceedings of the The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children
    June 2016
    774 pages
    ISBN:9781450343138
    DOI:10.1145/2930674
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 21 June 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Making
    2. children
    3. curriculum
    4. education
    5. elementary school
    6. maker
    7. maker kits

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    IDC '16
    Sponsor:
    IDC '16: Interaction Design and Children
    June 21 - 24, 2016
    Manchester, United Kingdom

    Acceptance Rates

    IDC '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 36 of 77 submissions, 47%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 172 of 578 submissions, 30%

    Upcoming Conference

    IDC '25
    Interaction Design and Children
    June 23 - 26, 2025
    Reykjavik , Iceland

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)112
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14
    Reflects downloads up to 25 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)IF science AND making AND computing: Insights for project-based learning and primary science curriculum designStudies in Science Education10.1080/03057267.2024.2397300(1-65)Online publication date: 19-Sep-2024
    • (2022)Uncovering Children's Situated Design Capital – A Nexus Analytic InquiryProceedings of the 21st Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3501712.3529732(408-421)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2022
    • (2022)Maker Technology and the Promise of Empowerment in a Flemish School for Disabled ChildrenProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3501853(1-18)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
    • (2021)Studying the Formation of an Older Adult-Led MakerspaceProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3411764.3445146(1-11)Online publication date: 6-May-2021
    • (2020)3D Printing in the Wild: Adopting Digital Fabrication in Elementary School EducationInternational Journal of Art & Design Education10.1111/jade.1231039:3(600-615)Online publication date: 25-Jun-2020
    • (2019)Interaction Order and Historical Body Shaping Children’s Making Projects—A Literature ReviewMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti30400713:4(71)Online publication date: 28-Oct-2019
    • (2019)Tinkering with MusicProceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children10.1145/3311927.3323127(220-226)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2019
    • (2019)Extending Student Labs with SMT Circuit ImplementationProceedings of the 2019 Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI10.1145/3299874.3317968(231-236)Online publication date: 13-May-2019
    • (2019)A Literature Review of the Practice of Educating Children About Technology MakingHuman-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 201910.1007/978-3-030-29381-9_27(418-441)Online publication date: 2-Sep-2019
    • (2018)Exploring the 3D printing process for young children in curriculum-aligned making in the classroomProceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children10.1145/3202185.3210799(681-686)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2018
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media