Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2948910.2948921acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmocoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Control of a slide flute: a mechatronic project

Published: 05 July 2016 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the problem of controlling a slide flute: a kind of recorder without finger holes but ended by a piston mechanism to modify the length of the resonator. From a physical point of view, stopped pipes have not been studied so widely as open pipes, and moving boundary conditions introduce interesting mathematical problems. To control dynamical systems, it is important to elaborate a realistic model, so that control laws can be tested efficiently before they are implemented on real size prototypes. This dynamical model has been elaborated in a previous work and the control law has been validated on a first prototype. The feedback term of this control law used on-line measurements on the system: the length of the piston through an encoder and the blowing pressure through a pressure sensor. But the flute moved too slowly. To improve the precision of the control and the velocity of the piston we have developed a new "mechatronic" prototype in our laboratory which is the object of the present paper.

References

[1]
B. d'Andréa-Novel, B. Fabre, J.-M. Coron, "An acoustic model for automatic control of a slide flute", Acta Acustica united with Acustica, Vol. 96, pp. 713--721 (2010)
[2]
B. d'Andréa-Novel, B. Fabre, J.-M. Coron, "An Acoustic Model to Control an Experimental Slide Flute", Proc. of the CFA'12, Acoustics 2012, Nantes, April (2012)
[3]
B. d'Andréa-Novel, B. Fabre, P. Jouvelot, "Acoustique-Informatique-MusiquE - Outils scientifiques pour la musique", Presses des Mines, Paris (2012)
[4]
N. Lopes, T. Hélie, R. Caussé, "Control of an Artificial Mouth Playing a Trombone and Analysis of Sound Descriptors on Experimental Data", Proc. of SMAC: Stockholm Music Acoustics Conference, pp. 521--528, (2013)
[5]
J.-F. Petiot, F. Teissier, J. Gilbert and M. Campbell, "Comparative analysis of brass wind instruments with an artificial mouth: First results", Acta Acustica united with Acustica, Vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 974--979, (2003)
[6]
C. Vergez, X. Rodet, "Experiments with an artificial mouth for trumpet", Proc. of ISMA: International Symposium of Music Acoustics, Leavenworth, Washington State, USA, pp. 153--158, June (1998)
[7]
The ABC music standard 2.1 in http://abcnotation.com/wiki/abc:standard:v2.1, december (2011)
[8]
LinMot - User Manual LinRS Interface in http://www.linmot.com/fileadmin/user_upload/Downloads/software-firmware/servo-drives/linmot-talk-6/Usermanual_LinRS_e_recent.pdf, (2014)

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
MOCO '16: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Movement and Computing
July 2016
300 pages
ISBN:9781450343077
DOI:10.1145/2948910
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

  • University of Macedonia
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
  • Université Paris 8: Université Paris 8

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 05 July 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Control
  2. Mechatronics
  3. Musical and Creative Robotics
  4. Slide Flute

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

MOCO'16

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 85 of 185 submissions, 46%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 46
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 20 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media