Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2949035.2949064acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescgiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Visualizing tumor environment with perfusion and diffusion MRI: Computational challenges

Published: 28 June 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Visualizing tumor environment is a critical task for assessing treatment response as well as tailoring therapy to the individual by better understanding the viable, necrotic and hypoxic areas. While a number of imaging modalities can provide complementary information about the tumor composition, there are several constraints regarding radiation, cost and patient tolerance that dictate the need of non-invasive and cost-effective methods to be used for tumor imaging in the context of personalized medicine. In this paper we present some of the major challenges in imaging tumor environment using perfusion and diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) based on the actual computational workflows and discuss important computational issues that affect the robustness, reproducibility as well as the clinical significance of the extracted clinical biomarkers.

References

[1]
S. Warach, J. Gaa, B. Siewert, P. Wielopolski, R.R. Edelman. 1995. Acute human stroke studied by whole brain echo planar diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol. 1995; 37: 231--241.
[2]
N. Kartalis, et al. 2016. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of pancreatic cancer: A comparison of mono-exponential, bi-exponential and non-Gaussian kurtosis models. European Journal of Radiology Open,3, 79--85.
[3]
D. Le Bihan, E. Breton, D. Lallemand, P. Grenier, E. Cabanis, M. Laval-Jeantet. 1986. MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radiology. 161(2):401--7.
[4]
M. Law, et al. 2004. Comparison of cerebral blood volume and vascular permeability from dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging with glioma grade. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 25(5):746--755.
[5]
V.A. Larsen, H. J. Simonsen, I. Law, H. B. Larsson and A. E. Hansen. 2013. Evaluation of dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted perfusion MRI in the differentiation of tumor recurrence from radiation necrosis. Neuroradiology 55(3):361--369.
[6]
E. Kontopodis, G. Kanli, G. C. Manikis, S. Van Cauter, and K. Marias. 2015. Assessing treatment response through generalized pharmacokinetic modeling of DCE-MRI Data. Cancer Inform., vol. 14, pp. 41--51.
[7]
C.F. Lucchinetti, et al. 2008. Clinical and radiographic spectrum of pathologically confirmed tumefactive multiple sclerosis. Brain 131(Pt 7):1759--1775.
[8]
G.C. Manikis, E. Kontopodis, K. Nikiforaki, K. Marias, N. Papanikolaou. 2016. Imaging biomarkers model-based analysis. Imaging Biomarkers: Development and Clinical Integration. Springer (in press).
[9]
F. Chen, Y.C. Ni. 2012. Magnetic resonance diffusion-perfusion mismatch in acute ischemic stroke: An update. World J Radiol 4(3):63--74.
[10]
R.J. Gillies, N. Raghunand, G. S. Karczmar and Z. M. Bhujwalla. 2002. MRI of the tumor microenvironment. J Magn Reson Imaging 16(4):430--450.
[11]
G.C. Manikis, N. Papanikolaou, C. Matos. 2016. Validating the imaging biomarker: the proof of efficacy and effectiveness. Imaging Biomarkers: Development and Clinical Integration. Springer (in press).
[12]
R.R. Price, et al. 1990. Quality assurance methods and phantoms for magnetic resonance imaging: Report of AAPM nuclear magnetic resonance Task Group No. 1." Med Phys 17(2):287--295.
[13]
D. L. Raunig, et al., and QIBA Technical Performance Working Group. 2015. Quantitative imaging biomarkers: a review of statistical methods for technical performance assessment. Stat Methods Med Res 24(1):27--67.
[14]
T. Fritz-Hansen, et al. 1996. Measurement of the arterial concentration of Gd-DTPA using MRI: a step toward quantitative perfusion imaging. Magn. Reson. Med., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 225--2.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Trends & Opportunities in Visualization for Physiology: A Multiscale OverviewComputer Graphics Forum10.1111/cgf.1457541:3(609-643)Online publication date: 29-Jul-2022
  • (2019)Perceptual Generative Adversarial Network for Image Inpainting with Regular and Irregular Patch2019 2nd International Conference on Safety Produce Informatization (IICSPI)10.1109/IICSPI48186.2019.9095931(46-50)Online publication date: Nov-2019
  1. Visualizing tumor environment with perfusion and diffusion MRI: Computational challenges

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      CGI '16: Proceedings of the 33rd Computer Graphics International
      June 2016
      130 pages
      ISBN:9781450341233
      DOI:10.1145/2949035
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      In-Cooperation

      • FORTH: Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 28 June 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Biomarkers
      2. DCE-MRI
      3. DWI-MRI
      4. cancer image analysis
      5. medical image analysis

      Qualifiers

      • Short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Funding Sources

      Conference

      CGI '16
      CGI '16: Computer Graphics International
      June 28 - July 1, 2016
      Heraklion, Greece

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 35 of 159 submissions, 22%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 27 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2022)Trends & Opportunities in Visualization for Physiology: A Multiscale OverviewComputer Graphics Forum10.1111/cgf.1457541:3(609-643)Online publication date: 29-Jul-2022
      • (2019)Perceptual Generative Adversarial Network for Image Inpainting with Regular and Irregular Patch2019 2nd International Conference on Safety Produce Informatization (IICSPI)10.1109/IICSPI48186.2019.9095931(46-50)Online publication date: Nov-2019

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media