Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2959100.2959179acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrecsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Behaviorism is Not Enough: Better Recommendations through Listening to Users

Published: 07 September 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Behaviorism is the currently-dominant paradigm for building and evaluating recommender systems. Both the operation and the evaluation of recommender system applications are most often driven by analyzing the behavior of users. In this paper, we argue that listening to what users say about the items and recommendations they like, the control they wish to exert on the output, and the ways in which they perceive the system and not just observing what they do will enable important developments in the future of recommender systems. We provide both philosophical and pragmatic motivations for this idea, describe the various points in the recommendation and evaluation processes where explicit user input may be considered, and discuss benefits that may result from considered incorporation of user preferences at each of these points. In particular, we envision recommender applications that aim to support users' better selves: helping them live the life that they desire to lead. For example, recommender-assisted behavior change requires algorithms to predict not what users choose or do now, inferable from behavioral data, but what they should choose or do in the future to become healthier, fitter, more sustainable, or culturally aware. We hope that our work will spur useful discussion and many new ideas for recommenders that empower their users.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (p221.mp4)

References

[1]
Amatriain, X. 2016. Past, Present, and Future of Recom-mender Systems: An Industry Perspective.
[2]
Anand, S.S. and Mobasher, B. 2007. Contextual Recommendation. From Web to Social Web: Discovering and Deploying User and Content Profiles. B. Berendt, A. Hotho, D. Mladenic, and G. Semeraro, eds. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 142--160.
[3]
Cialdini, R.B. 2001. Influence: Science and Practice. Allyn and Bacon.
[4]
Ekstrand, M.D., Harper, F.M., Willemsen, M.C. and Konstan, J.A. 2014. User Perception of Differences in Recommender Algorithms. Proc. ACM RecSys '14, 161--168.
[5]
Ekstrand, M.D., Kluver, D., Harper, F.M. and Konstan, J.A. 2015. Letting Users Choose Recommender Algorithms: An Experimental Study. Proc. ACM RecSys '15, 11--18.
[6]
Evans, J. 2014. Twitter's Huge Mistake. TechCrunch.
[7]
Franklin, U.M. 2004. The Real World of Technology. House of Anansi Press.
[8]
Harper, F.M., Xu, F., Kaur, H., Condiff, K., Chang, S. and Terveen, L. 2015. Putting Users in Control of Their Recommendations. Proc. ACM RecSys '15, 3--10.
[9]
Hill, W., Stead, L., Rosenstein, M. and Furnas, G. 1995. Recommending and evaluating choices in a virtual community of use. Proc. CHI '95, 194--201.
[10]
Kapoor, K., Kumar, V., Terveen, L., Konstan, J.A. and Schrater, P. 2015. "I Like to Explore Sometimes": Adapting to Dynamic User Novelty Preferences. Proc. ACM RecSys '15, 19--26.
[11]
Kaptein, M., Markopoulos, P., de Ruyter, B. and Aarts, E. 2015. Personalizing persuasive technologies: Explicit and implicit personalization using persuasion profiles. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 77, (May 2015), 38--51.
[12]
Knijnenburg, B., Willemsen, M., Gantner, Z., Soncu, H. and Newell, C. 2012. Explaining the user experience of recommender systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction. 22, 4-5 (Oct. 2012), 441--504.
[13]
McNee, S., Kapoor, N. and Konstan, J.A. 2006. Don't Look Stupid: Avoiding Pitfalls When Recommending Research Papers. Proc. ACM CSCW '06, 171.
[14]
McNee, S., Riedl, J. and Konstan, J.A. 2006. Making recommendations better: an analytic model for human-recommender interaction. CHI '06 Extended Abstracts (2006), 1103--1108.
[15]
Pariser, E. 2011. The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web Is Changing What We Read and How We Think. Penguin.
[16]
Phelan, O., McCarthy, K., Bennett, M. and Smyth, B. 2011. Terms of a Feather: Content-Based News Recommendation and Discovery Using Twitter. In Advances in Information Retrieval, LNCS 6611. Springer. 448--459.
[17]
Prochaska, J.O. and DiClemente, C.C. 1984. The trans-theoretical approach: crossing traditional boundaries of therapy. Dow Jones-Irwin.
[18]
Prochaska, J.O. and Norcross, J.C. 2001. Stages of change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. 38, 4 (2001), 443--448.
[19]
Rutjes, H., Willemsen, M.C. and IJsselsteijn, W.A. 2016. Understanding Effective Coaching on Healthy Lifestyle by Combining Theory- and Data-Driven Approaches. Proc. Workshop on Personalization in Persuasive Technology at Persuasive 2016.
[20]
Starke, A., Willemsen, M.C. and Snijders, C. 2015. Saving Energy in 1-D: Tailoring Energy-saving Advice Using a Rasch-based Energy Recommender System. Proc. 2nd Int. Workshop on Decision Making and Rec. Sys., 5--8.
[21]
Suchman, L. 1993. Foreword. Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. D. Schuler and A. Namioka, eds. CRC / Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. vii--x.
[22]
Ziegler, C.-N., McNee, S., Konstan, J.A. and Lausen, G. 2005. Improving Recommendation Lists through Topic Diversification. Proc. WWW '05, 22--32.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Evaluating ADHD Users’ Experience with Recommender SystemsCompanion Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3640544.3645222(84-88)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Unpacking the exploration–exploitation tradeoff on SnapchatComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2023.108014150:COnline publication date: 1-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Skewed perspectives: examining the influence of engagement maximization on content diversity in social media feedsJournal of Computational Social Science10.1007/s42001-024-00255-w7:1(721-739)Online publication date: 20-Mar-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
RecSys '16: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
September 2016
490 pages
ISBN:9781450340359
DOI:10.1145/2959100
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 September 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. algo-rithmic filtering
  2. information filtering
  3. participatory design
  4. recommender systems
  5. user studies

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

RecSys '16
Sponsor:
RecSys '16: Tenth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
September 15 - 19, 2016
Massachusetts, Boston, USA

Acceptance Rates

RecSys '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 29 of 159 submissions, 18%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 254 of 1,295 submissions, 20%

Upcoming Conference

RecSys '24
18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
October 14 - 18, 2024
Bari , Italy

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)131
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12
Reflects downloads up to 30 Aug 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Evaluating ADHD Users’ Experience with Recommender SystemsCompanion Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3640544.3645222(84-88)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Unpacking the exploration–exploitation tradeoff on SnapchatComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2023.108014150:COnline publication date: 1-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Skewed perspectives: examining the influence of engagement maximization on content diversity in social media feedsJournal of Computational Social Science10.1007/s42001-024-00255-w7:1(721-739)Online publication date: 20-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Psychologically Informed Design of Energy Recommender Systems: Are Nudges Still Effective in Tailored Choice Environments?A Human-Centered Perspective of Intelligent Personalized Environments and Systems10.1007/978-3-031-55109-3_9(221-259)Online publication date: 1-May-2024
  • (2024)The Role of Human-Centered AI in User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization—Models, Frameworks, and ParadigmsA Human-Centered Perspective of Intelligent Personalized Environments and Systems10.1007/978-3-031-55109-3_2(43-84)Online publication date: 1-May-2024
  • (2024)Human Factors in User Modeling for Intelligent SystemsA Human-Centered Perspective of Intelligent Personalized Environments and Systems10.1007/978-3-031-55109-3_1(3-42)Online publication date: 1-May-2024
  • (2024)Measuring the benefit of increased transparency and control in news recommendationAI Magazine10.1002/aaai.12171Online publication date: 17-Apr-2024
  • (2023)Persons and Personalization on Digital PlatformsPhilosophy of Artificial Intelligence and Its Place in Society10.4018/978-1-6684-9591-9.ch011(214-270)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Leveraging Large Language Models for Goal-driven Interactive RecommendationsProceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction10.1145/3623809.3623965(464-466)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2023
  • (2023)Assessing the Impact of Music Recommendation Diversity on Listeners: A Longitudinal StudyACM Transactions on Recommender Systems10.1145/36084872:1(1-47)Online publication date: 12-Jul-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media