Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2971648.2971749acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Characterizing the life cycle of point of interests using human mobility patterns

Published: 12 September 2016 Publication History

Abstract

A Point of Interest (POI) refers to a specific location that people may find useful or interesting. While a large body of research has been focused on identifying and recommending POIs, there are few studies on characterizing the life cycle of POIs. Indeed, a comprehensive understanding of POI life cycle can be helpful for various tasks, such as urban planning, business site selection, and real estate evaluation. In this paper, we develop a framework, named POLIP, for characterizing the POI life cycle with multiple data sources. Specifically, to investigate the POI evolution process over time, we first formulate a serial classification problem to predict the life status of POIs. The prediction approach is designed to integrate two important perspectives: 1) the spatial-temporal dependencies associated with the prosperity of POIs, and 2) the human mobility dynamics hidden in the citywide taxicab data related to the POIs at multiple granularity levels. In addition, based on the predicted life statuses in successive time windows for a given POI, we design an algorithm to characterize its life cycle. Finally, we performed extensive experiments using large-scale and real-world datasets. The results demonstrate the feasibility in automatic characterizing POI life cycle and shed important light on future research directions.

References

[1]
Michael Batty, Yichun Xie, and Zhanli Sun. 1999. Modeling urban dynamics through GIS-based cellular automata. Computers, environment and urban systems 23, 3 (1999), 205--233.
[2]
Chih-Chung Chang and Chih-Jen Lin. 2011. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology 2 (2011), 27:1--27:27. Issue 3.
[3]
Yongjiu Feng, Yan Liu, and Michael Batty. 2015. Modeling urban growth with GIS based cellular automata and least squares SVM rules: a case study in Qingpu--Songjiang area of Shanghai, China. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment (2015), 1--14.
[4]
Yanjie Fu, Guannan Liu, Spiros Papadimitriou, Hui Xiong, Yong Ge, Hengshu Zhu, and Chen Zhu. 2015. Real Estate Ranking via Mixed Land-use Latent Models. In Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 299--308.
[5]
Yanjie Fu, Hui Xiong, Yong Ge, Zijun Yao, Yu Zheng, and Zhi-Hua Zhou. 2014. Exploiting geographic dependencies for real estate appraisal: a mutual perspective of ranking and clustering. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 1047--1056.
[6]
Mordechai Haklay. 2010. How good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey datasets. Environment and planning B: Planning and design 37, 4 (2010), 682--703.
[7]
Zhiyong Hu and CP Lo. 2007. Modeling urban growth in Atlanta using logistic regression. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 31, 6 (2007), 667--688.
[8]
Lyndon S Kennedy and Mor Naaman. 2008. Generating diverse and representative image search results for landmarks. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 297--306.
[9]
Slava Kisilevich, Florian Mansmann, and Daniel Keim. 2010. P-DBSCAN: a density based clustering algorithm for exploration and analysis of attractive areas using collections of geo-tagged photos. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference and exhibition on computing for geospatial research & application. ACM, 38.
[10]
Hans RA Koster and Jan Rouwendal. 2012. The impact of mixed land use on residential property values. Journal of Regional Science 52, 5 (2012), 733--761.
[11]
Defu Lian and Xing Xie. 2011. Learning location naming from user check-in histories. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. ACM, 112--121.
[12]
Bin Liu, Yanjie Fu, Zijun Yao, and Hui Xiong. 2013a. Learning geographical preferences for point-of-interest recommendation. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 1043--1051.
[13]
Bin Liu and Hui Xiong. 2013. Point-of-Interest Recommendation in Location Based Social Networks with Topic and Location Awareness. In SDM, Vol. 13. SIAM, 396--404.
[14]
Qi Liu, Enhong Chen, Hui Xiong, Yong Ge, Zhongmou Li, and Xiang Wu. 2014. A cocktail approach for travel package recommendation. Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions on 26, 2 (2014), 278--293.
[15]
Xin Liu, Yong Liu, Karl Aberer, and Chunyan Miao. 2013b. Personalized point-of-interest recommendation by mining users' preference transition. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Conference on information & knowledge management. ACM, 733--738.
[16]
Hans Peter Luhn. 1957. A statistical approach to mechanized encoding and searching of literary information. IBM Journal of research and development 1, 4 (1957), 309--317.
[17]
Hernén A Makse, Shlomo Havlin, and HE Stanley. 1995. Modelling urban growth. Nature 377, 1912 (1995), 779--782.
[18]
Christopher D Manning, Prabhakar Raghavan, and Hinrich Schütze. 2008. Scoring, term weighting and the vector space model. Introduction to Information Retrieval 100 (2008), 2--4.
[19]
Harry Markowitz. 1952. Portfolio selection. The journal of finance 7, 1 (1952), 77--91.
[20]
Kyosuke Nishida, Hiroyuki Toda, Takeshi Kurashima, and Yoshihiko Suhara. 2014. Probabilistic identification of visited point-of-interest for personalized automatic check-in. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 631--642.
[21]
Xiaojun Quan, Liu Wenyin, Wenyu Dou, Hui Xiong, and Yong Ge. 2012. Link graph analysis for business site selection. Computer 45, 3 (2012), 64--69.
[22]
Alex Rodriguez and Alessandro Laio. 2014. Clustering by fast search and find of density peaks. Science 344, 6191 (2014), 1492--1496.
[23]
Ionut Trestian, Kévin Huguenin, Ling Su, and Aleksandar Kuzmanovic. 2012. Understanding human movement semantics: a point of interest based approach. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference companion on World Wide Web. ACM, 619--620.
[24]
Michael Wegener. 1994. Operational urban models state of the art. Journal of the American Planning Association 60, 1 (1994), 17--29.
[25]
Yiyang Yang, Zhiguo Gong, and others. 2015. Identifying Points of Interest Using Heterogeneous Features. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 5, 4 (2015), 68.
[26]
Mao Ye, Peifeng Yin, Wang-Chien Lee, and Dik-Lun Lee. 2011. Exploiting geographical influence for collaborative point-of-interest recommendation. In Proceedings of the 34th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 325--334.
[27]
Gang Yu, Junsong Yuan, and Zicheng Liu. 2012. Predicting human activities using spatio-temporal structure of interest points. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Multimedia. ACM, 1049--1052.
[28]
Zhiwen Yu, Huang Xu, Zhe Yang, and Bin Guo. 2016. Personalized Travel Package With Multi-Point-of-Interest Recommendation Based on Crowdsourced User Footprints. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 46, 1 (2016), 151 -- 158.
[29]
Jing Yuan, Yu Zheng, Liuhang Zhang, XIng Xie, and Guangzhong Sun. 2011. Where to find my next passenger. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Ubiquitous computing. ACM, 109--118.
[30]
Nicholas Jing Yuan, Yu Zheng, Xing Xie, Yingzi Wang, Kai Zheng, and Hui Xiong. 2015. Discovering urban functional zones using latent activity trajectories. Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions on 27, 3 (2015), 712--725.
[31]
Quan Yuan, Gao Cong, Zongyang Ma, Aixin Sun, and Nadia Magnenat Thalmann. 2013. Time-aware point-of-interest recommendation. In Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. ACM, 363--372.
[32]
Quan Yuan, Gao Cong, and Aixin Sun. 2014. Graph-based point-of-interest recommendation with geographical and temporal influences. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, 659--668.
[33]
Daqing Zhang, Bin Guo, and Zhiwen Yu. 2011. The emergence of social and community intelligence. Computer 44, 7 (2011), 21--28.
[34]
Yu Zheng, Furui Liu, and Hsun-Ping Hsieh. 2013. U-Air: When urban air quality inference meets big data. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 1436--1444.
[35]
Yu Zheng, Tong Liu, Yilun Wang, Yanmin Zhu, Yanchi Liu, and Eric Chang. 2014. Diagnosing New York city's noises with ubiquitous data. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 715--725.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Characterizing and Forecasting Urban Vibrancy Evolution: A Multi-View Graph Mining PerspectiveACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data10.1145/356868317:5(1-24)Online publication date: 28-Feb-2023
  • (2023)Spatiotemporal Task Allocation in Mobile CrowdsensingMobile Crowdsourcing10.1007/978-3-031-32397-3_7(163-189)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2023
  • (2020)Understanding the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Transportation-related Behaviors with Human Mobility DataProceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining10.1145/3394486.3412856(3443-3450)Online publication date: 23-Aug-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Characterizing the life cycle of point of interests using human mobility patterns

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    UbiComp '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing
    September 2016
    1288 pages
    ISBN:9781450344616
    DOI:10.1145/2971648
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 12 September 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. POI life cycle prediction
    2. human mobility
    3. urban planning

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    UbiComp '16

    Acceptance Rates

    UbiComp '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 101 of 389 submissions, 26%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 764 of 2,912 submissions, 26%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 17 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Characterizing and Forecasting Urban Vibrancy Evolution: A Multi-View Graph Mining PerspectiveACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data10.1145/356868317:5(1-24)Online publication date: 28-Feb-2023
    • (2023)Spatiotemporal Task Allocation in Mobile CrowdsensingMobile Crowdsourcing10.1007/978-3-031-32397-3_7(163-189)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2023
    • (2020)Understanding the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Transportation-related Behaviors with Human Mobility DataProceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining10.1145/3394486.3412856(3443-3450)Online publication date: 23-Aug-2020
    • (2020)Inferring Lifetime Status of Point-of-InterestACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data10.1145/336979914:1(1-27)Online publication date: 3-Feb-2020
    • (2019)GeoLifecycleProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/33512503:3(1-29)Online publication date: 9-Sep-2019
    • (2019)Personalized Visited-POI Assignment to Individual Raw GPS TrajectoriesACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and Systems10.1145/33176675:3(1-28)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2019
    • (2019)CompetitiveBike: Competitive Analysis and Popularity Prediction of Bike-Sharing Apps Using Multi-Source DataIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2018.286893318:8(1760-1773)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2019
    • (2019)CompetitiveBike: Competitive Prediction of Bike-Sharing Apps Using Heterogeneous Crowdsourced DataGreen, Pervasive, and Cloud Computing10.1007/978-3-030-15093-8_17(241-255)Online publication date: 15-Mar-2019
    • (2018)Revisitation in Urban Space vs. OnlineProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/32870342:4(1-24)Online publication date: 27-Dec-2018
    • (2018)Uniqueness in the CityProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/32142652:2(1-20)Online publication date: 5-Jul-2018
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media