Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2983323.2983359acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

On Structural Health Monitoring Using Tensor Analysis and Support Vector Machine with Artificial Negative Data

Published: 24 October 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Structural health monitoring is a condition-based technology to monitor infrastructure using sensing systems. Since we usually only have data associated with the healthy state of a structure, one-class approaches are more practical. However, tuning the parameters for one-class techniques (like one-class Support Vector Machines) still remains a relatively open and difficult problem. Moreover, in structural health monitoring, data are usually multi-way, highly redundant and correlated, which a matrix-based two-way approach cannot capture all these relationships and correlations together. Tensor analysis allows us to analyse the multi-way vibration data at the same time. In our approach, we propose the use of tensor learning and support vector machines with artificial negative data generated by density estimation techniques for damage detection, localization and estimation in a one-class manner. The artificial negative data can help tuning SVM parameters and calibrating probabilistic outputs, which is not possible to do with one-class SVM. The proposed method shows promising results using data from laboratory-based structures and also with data collected from the Sydney Harbour Bridge, one of the most iconic structures in Australia. The method works better than the one-class approach and the approach without using tensor analysis.

References

[1]
E. Acar and B. Yener. Unsupervised multiway data analysis: A literature survey. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 21(1):6--20, 2009.
[2]
M. M. Alamdari. Vibration-based Structural Health Monitoring. PhD thesis, 2015.
[3]
C. A. Andersson and R. Bro. The n-way toolbox forMATLAB\. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 52(1):1--4, 2000.
[4]
B. W. Bader, T. G. Kolda, et al. Matlab tensor toolbox version 2.5. Available online, January 2012.
[5]
C. M. Bishop. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer, Singapore, 2013.
[6]
M. M. Breunig, H.-P. Kriegel, R. T. Ng, and J. Sander. Lof: Identifying density-based local outliers. In International Conference on Management of Data, Dallas, Texas, 2000. ACM SIGMOD.
[7]
R. Brincker, L. Zhang, and P. Andersen. Modal identification from ambient responses using frequency domain decomposition. In IMAC 18 : Proceedings of the International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC), San Antonio, Texas, USA, February 7-10, 2000, pages 625--630, 2000.
[8]
R. Bro and H. A. L. Kiers. A new efficient method for determining the number of components in parafac models. J. of Chemometrics, 17(5):274--286, 2003.
[9]
T. H. Chan, Y.-Q. Ni, and J. M. Ko. Neural network novelty filtering for anomaly detection. In F. Cheng, editor, 2nd International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, pages 133--137, Standford, USA, 1999. Technomic Pub. Co.
[10]
C.-C. Chang and C.-J. Lin. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM Trans. on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2:27:1--27:27, 2011.
[11]
P. Cheema, N. F. Giannelis, and G. A. Vio. Experimental validation of polynomial chaos theory on an aircraft t-tail. In 18th AIAA Non-Deterministic Approaches Conference, 2016.
[12]
C. R. Farrar and K. Worden. An introduction to structural health monitoring. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 365(1851):303--315, 2007.
[13]
J. Gao and P.-N. Tan. Converting output scores from outlier detection algorithms into probability estimates. In Data Mining, 2006. ICDM'06. Sixth International Conference on, pages 212--221. IEEE, 2006.
[14]
S. Khazai, S. Homayouni, A. Safari, and B. Mojaradi. Anomaly detection in hyperspectral images based on an adaptive support vector method. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 8(4):646--650, 2011.
[15]
N. L. D. Khoa, B. Zhang, Y. Wang, W. Liu, F. Chen, S. Mustapha, and P. Runcie. PAKDD 2015, Vietnam, May 19--22, 2015, Proceedings, Part I, chapter On Damage Identification in Civil Structures Using Tensor Analysis, pages 459--471. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2015.
[16]
T. G. Kolda and B. W. Bader. Tensor decompositions and applications. SIAM Review, 51(3):455--500, September 2009.
[17]
T. G. Kolda and J. Sun. Scalable tensor decompositions for multi-aspect data mining. In ICDM 2008: Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pages 363--372, December 2008.
[18]
LANL. Los alamos national laboratory website, 2013. (last visited: 01/06/2013).
[19]
L. Manevitz and M. Yousef. One-class svms for document classification. Machine Learning Research, 2:139--154, 2002.
[20]
K. Matej, A. Leonardis, and S. Danijel. Multivariate online kernel density estimation with gaussian kernels. Pattern Recognition, 44:2630--2642, 2011.
[21]
I. T. Nabney. NETLAB: Algorithms for Pattern Recognition. Springer, 2002.
[22]
J. C. Platt. Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparisons to regularized likelihood methods. In Advances In Large Margin Classifiers, pages 61--74. MIT Press, 1999.
[23]
M. A. Prada, J. Toivola, J. Kullaa, and J. Hollmén. Three-way analysis of structural health monitoring data. Neurocomputing, 80(0):119--128, 2012. Special Issue on Machine Learning for Signal Processing 2010.
[24]
P. J. Rousseeuw. Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of computational and applied mathematics, 20:53--65, 1987.
[25]
P. Runcie, S. Mustapha, and T. Rakotoarivelo. Advances in structural health monitoring system architecture. In Proceedings of the the fourth International Symposium on Life-Cycle Civil Engineering, IALCCE '14, pages 1064--1071, 2014.
[26]
A. Rytter. Vibration-based inspection of civil engineering structures. PhD thesis, University of Aalborg, Denmark, 1993.
[27]
B. Schölkopf, J. C. Platt, J. C. Shawe-Taylor, A. J. Smola, and R. C. Williamson. Estimating the support of a high-dimensional distribution. Neural Computation, 13(7):1443--1471, July 2001.
[28]
V. A. Sotiris, P. W. Tse, and M. G. Pecht. Anomaly detection through bayesian support vector machine. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 59:277--286, 2010.
[29]
D. M. Tax and R. P. Duin. Support vector data description. Machine Learning, 54:45--66, 2004.
[30]
K. Worden and G. Manson. The application of machine learning to structural health monitoring. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 365(1851):515--537, 2007.
[31]
K. Worden, G. Manson, and N. Fieller. Damage detection using outlier analysis. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 229(3):647--667, 2000.
[32]
G. D. Wyss and K. H. Jorgensen. A user's guide to lhs: Sandia's latin hypercube sampling software. Technical report, Sandia National Laboratories, 1998.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)A drive-by bridge inspection framework using non-parametric clusters over projected data manifoldsMechanical Systems and Signal Processing10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109401180(109401)Online publication date: Nov-2022
  • (2022)An extreme learning machine for unsupervised online anomaly detection in multivariate time seriesNeurocomputing10.1016/j.neucom.2022.06.042501:C(596-608)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2022
  • (2021)Comparison of unsupervised shallow and deep models for structural health monitoringProceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Bridge Engineering10.1680/jbren.21.00016(1-11)Online publication date: 24-Nov-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CIKM '16: Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
October 2016
2566 pages
ISBN:9781450340731
DOI:10.1145/2983323
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 24 October 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. artificial negative data
  2. damage identification
  3. density estimation
  4. support vector machine
  5. tensor analysis

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

CIKM'16
Sponsor:
CIKM'16: ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
October 24 - 28, 2016
Indiana, Indianapolis, USA

Acceptance Rates

CIKM '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 160 of 701 submissions, 23%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,861 of 8,427 submissions, 22%

Upcoming Conference

CIKM '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)A drive-by bridge inspection framework using non-parametric clusters over projected data manifoldsMechanical Systems and Signal Processing10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109401180(109401)Online publication date: Nov-2022
  • (2022)An extreme learning machine for unsupervised online anomaly detection in multivariate time seriesNeurocomputing10.1016/j.neucom.2022.06.042501:C(596-608)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2022
  • (2021)Comparison of unsupervised shallow and deep models for structural health monitoringProceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Bridge Engineering10.1680/jbren.21.00016(1-11)Online publication date: 24-Nov-2021
  • (2021)Online Tensor-Based Learning Model for Structural Damage DetectionACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data10.1145/345121715:6(1-18)Online publication date: 19-May-2021
  • (2021)A Unifying Review of Deep and Shallow Anomaly DetectionProceedings of the IEEE10.1109/JPROC.2021.3052449109:5(756-795)Online publication date: May-2021
  • (2020)Online Tensor Decomposition with optimized Stochastic Gradient Descent: an Application in Structural Damage Identification2020 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI)10.1109/SSCI47803.2020.9308310(1257-1264)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2020
  • (2019)A Tensor-based Structural Health Monitoring Approach for Aeroservoelastic SystemsAIAA Scitech 2019 Forum10.2514/6.2019-1964Online publication date: 6-Jan-2019
  • (2018)A loss framework for calibrated anomaly detectionProceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems10.5555/3326943.3327080(1494-1504)Online publication date: 3-Dec-2018
  • (2018)Damage localization in composite plates using canonical polyadic decomposition of Lamb wave difference signals tensorIFAC-PapersOnLine10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.09.64751:24(668-673)Online publication date: 2018
  • (2017)Smart Infrastructure Maintenance Using Incremental Tensor AnalysisProceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/3132847.3132851(959-967)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2017

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media