Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2983323.2983365acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Hashtag Recommendation for Enterprise Applications

Published: 24 October 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Hashtags have been popularly used in several social cum consumer network settings such as Twitter and Facebook. In this paper, we consider the problem of recommending hashtags for enterprise applications. These applications include emails (e.g., Outlook), enterprise social networks (e.g., Yammer) and special interest group email lists. This problem arises in an organization setting and hashtags are enterprise domain specific. One important aspect of our recommendation system is that we recommend hashtags for Inline hashtag scenario where recommendations change as the user inserts hashtags while typing the message. This involves working with partial content information. Besides this, we consider the conventional Post} hashtagging scenario where hashtags are recommended for the full message. We also consider an important (sub)scenario, viz., Auto-complete where hashtags are recommended with user provided partial information such as sub-string present in the hashtag. Auto-complete can be used with both Inline and Post scenarios. To the best of our knowledge, Inline, Auto-complete hashtag recommendations and hashtagging in enterprise applications have not been studied before. We propose to learn a joint model that uses features of three types, namely, temporal, structural and content. Our learning formulation handles all the hashtagging scenarios naturally. Comprehensive experimental study on five datasets of user email accounts collected by running an Outlook plugin (a key requirement for large scale industrial deployment), one dataset of special interest group email list and one enterprise social network data set shows that the proposed method performs significantly better than the state of the art methods used in consumer applications such as Twitter. The primary reason is that different feature types play dominant role in different scenarios and datasets. Since the joint model makes use of all feature types effectively, it performs better in almost all scenarios and datasets.

References

[1]
M. Aery and S. Chakravarthy. emailsift: Email classification based on structure and content. In ICDM, pages 18--25. IEEE Computer Society, 2005.
[2]
R. Bekkerman, A. McCallum, and G. Huang. Automatic categorization of email into folders: Benchmark experiments on enron and sri corpora. Center for Intelligent Information Retrieval, Technical Report IR, 418, 2004.
[3]
D. Correa and A. Sureka. Mining tweets for tag recommendation on social media. In SMUC, SMUC '11, pages 69--76, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.
[4]
G. Cselle, K. Albrecht, and R. Wattenhofer. Buzztrack: topic detection and tracking in email. In D. N. Chin, M. X. Zhou, T. A. Lau, and A. R. Puerta, editors, IUI, pages 190--197. ACM, 2007.
[5]
Z. Ding, X. Qiu, Q. Zhang, and X. Huang. Learning topical translation model for microblog hashtag suggestion. In IJCAI, IJCAI '13, pages 2078--2084. AAAI Press, 2013.
[6]
M. Dolata, N. Jeners, and W. Prinz. How to tag it right? semi-automatic support for email management. In CollaborateCom 2013. ICST, 11 2013.
[7]
M. Dredze, T. Lau, and N. Kushmerick. Automatically classifying emails into activities. In IUI, IUI '06, pages 70--77, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM.
[8]
W. Feng and J. Wang. Incorporating heterogeneous information for personalized tag recommendation in social tagging systems. In KDD, KDD '12, pages 1276--1284, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM.
[9]
W. Feng and J. Wang. Learning to annotate tweets with crowd wisdom. In WWW, WWW '13 Companion, pages 57--58, Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland, 2013.
[10]
W. Feng and J. Wang. We can learn your#hashtags: Connecting tweets to explicit topics. In ICDE, pages 856--867, 2014.
[11]
F. Godin, V. Slavkovikj, W. De Neve, B. Schrauwen, and R. Van de Walle. Using topic models for twitter hashtag recommendation. In WWW, WWW '13 Companion, pages 593--596, Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland, 2013.
[12]
T. H. Haveliwala. Topic-sensitive pagerank: A context-sensitive ranking algorithm for web search. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 15(4):784--796, 2003.
[13]
E. Khabiri, J. Caverlee, and K. Y. Kamath. Predicting semantic annotations on the real-time web. In Hypertext and Social Media, HT '12, pages 219--228, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM.
[14]
Y. Koren, E. Liberty, Y. Maarek, and R. Sandler. Automatically tagging email by leveraging other users' folders. In KDD, KDD '11, pages 913--921, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.
[15]
S. M. Kywe, T.-A. Hoang, E.-P. Lim, and F. Zhu. On recommending hashtags in twitter networks. In Social Informatics, SocInfo'12, pages 337--350, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012. Springer-Verlag.
[16]
D. C. Liu and J. Nocedal. On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization. Math. Program., 45(1--3):503--528, 1989.
[17]
Z. Liu, C. Shi, and M. Sun. Folkdiffusion: A graph-based tag suggestion method for folksonomies. In Information Retrieval Technology - AIRS 2010, Taipei, Taiwan, December 1-3, 2010. Proceedings, pages 231--240, 2010.
[18]
Z. Ma, A. Sun, Q. Yuan, and G. Cong. Tagging your tweets: A probabilistic modeling of hashtag annotation in twitter. In CIKM, CIKM '14, pages 999--1008, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM.
[19]
E. Otsuka, S. A. Wallace, and D. Chiu. Design and evaluation of a twitter hashtag recommendation system. In IDEAS, IDEAS '14, pages 330--333, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM.
[20]
S. Sedhai and A. Sun. Hashtag recommendation for hyperlinked tweets. In SIGIR, SIGIR '14, pages 831--834, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM.
[21]
R. Segal and J. O. Kephart. Mailcat: An intelligent assistant for organizing e-mail. In AAAI, pages 925--926, 1999.
[22]
J. She and L. Chen. Tomoha: Topic model-based hashtag recommendation on twitter. In WWW, WWW Companion '14, pages 371--372, Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland, 2014.
[23]
C. Shi, X. Kong, Y. Huang, P. S. Yu, and B. Wu. Hetesim: A general framework for relevance measure in heterogeneous networks. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 26(10):2479--2492, 2014.
[24]
Y. Song, L. Zhang, and C. L. Giles. Automatic tag recommendation algorithms for social recommender systems. TWEB, 5(1):4, 2011.
[25]
Y. Sun and J. Han. Mining Heterogeneous Information Networks: Principles and Methodologies. Synthesis Lectures on Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2012.
[26]
A. C. Surendran, J. C. Platt, and E. Renshaw. Automatic discovery of personal topics to organize email. In CEAS, July 2005.
[27]
A. M. Szóstek. Dealing with my emails: Latent user needs in email management. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2):723--729, 2011.
[28]
E. Zangerle, W. Gassler, and G. Specht. On the impact of text similarity functions on hashtag recommendations in microblogging environments. Social Netw. Analys. Mining, 3(4):889--898, 2013.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)CultTags—Tags with Contextual RelevanceProceedings of International Conference on Communication and Computational Technologies10.1007/978-981-19-3951-8_63(831-844)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2022
  • (2019)Long-tail Hashtag Recommendation for Micro-videos with Graph Convolutional NetworkProceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/3357384.3357912(509-518)Online publication date: 3-Nov-2019

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CIKM '16: Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
October 2016
2566 pages
ISBN:9781450340731
DOI:10.1145/2983323
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 24 October 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. auto-complete
  2. enterprise application
  3. hashtag recommendation
  4. hashtags

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

CIKM'16
Sponsor:
CIKM'16: ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
October 24 - 28, 2016
Indiana, Indianapolis, USA

Acceptance Rates

CIKM '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 160 of 701 submissions, 23%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,861 of 8,427 submissions, 22%

Upcoming Conference

CIKM '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 23 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)CultTags—Tags with Contextual RelevanceProceedings of International Conference on Communication and Computational Technologies10.1007/978-981-19-3951-8_63(831-844)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2022
  • (2019)Long-tail Hashtag Recommendation for Micro-videos with Graph Convolutional NetworkProceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/3357384.3357912(509-518)Online publication date: 3-Nov-2019

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media