Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2993318.2993332acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessemanticsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploring Dynamics and Semantics of User Interests for User Modeling on Twitter for Link Recommendations

Published: 12 September 2016 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    User modeling for individual users on the Social Web plays an important role and is a fundamental step for personalization as well as recommendations. Recent studies have proposed different user modeling strategies considering various dimensions such as temporal dynamics and semantics of user interests. Although previous work proposed different user modeling strategies considering the temporal dynamics of user interests, there is a lack of comparative studies on those methods and therefore the comparative performance over each other is unknown. In terms of semantics of user interests, background knowledge from DBpedia has been explored to enrich user interest profiles so as to reveal more information about users. However, it is still unclear to what extent different types of information from DBpedia contribute to the enrichment of user interest profiles.
    In this paper, we propose user modeling strategies which use Concept Frequency - Inverse Document Frequency (CF-IDF) as a weighting scheme and incorporate either or both of the dynamics and semantics of user interests. To this end, we first provide a comparative study on different user modeling strategies considering the dynamics of user interests in previous literature to present their comparative performance. In addition, we investigate different types of information (i.e., categories, classes and connected entities via various properties) for entities from DBpedia and the combination of them for extending user interest profiles. Finally, we build our user modeling strategies incorporating either or both of the best-performing methods in each dimension. Results show that our strategies outperform two baseline strategies significantly in the context of link recommendations on Twitter.

    References

    [1]
    A. Abdel-Hafez and Y. Xu. A survey of user modelling in social media websites. Computer and Information Science, 6(4):p59, 2013.
    [2]
    F. Abel, Q. Gao, G.-J. Houben, and K. Tao. Analyzing temporal dynamics in twitter profiles for personalized recommendations in the social web. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Web Science Conference, page 2. ACM, 2011.
    [3]
    F. Abel, Q. Gao, G.-J. Houben, and K. Tao. Analyzing user modeling on twitter for personalized news recommendations. In User Modeling, Adaption and Personalization, pages 1--12. Springer, 2011.
    [4]
    F. Abel, Q. Gao, G.-J. Houben, and K. Tao. Semantic enrichment of twitter posts for user profile construction on the social web. In The Semanic Web: Research and Applications, pages 375--389. Springer, 2011.
    [5]
    F. Abel, C. Hauff, G.-J. Houben, and K. Tao. Leveraging User Modeling on the Social Web with Linked Data. In Web Engineering SE - 31, pages 378--385. Springer, 2012.
    [6]
    A. Ahmed, Y. Low, M. Aly, V. Josifovski, and A. J. Smola. Scalable distributed inference of dynamic user interests for behavioral targeting. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 114--122. ACM, 2011.
    [7]
    C. Bizer, T. Heath, and T. Berners-Lee. Linked Data - The Story So Far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 5(3):1--22, 2009.
    [8]
    C. Budak, A. Kannan, R. Agrawal, and J. Pedersen. Inferring user interests from microblogs. Technical report, 2014.
    [9]
    D. Godoy and A. Amandi. Modeling user interests by conceptual clustering. Information Systems, 31(4-5):247--265, jun 2006.
    [10]
    F. Goossen, W. IJntema, F. Frasincar, F. Hogenboom, and U. Kaymak. News personalization using the CF-IDF semantic recommender. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics, page 10. ACM, 2011.
    [11]
    M. Harvey, F. Crestani, and M. J. Carman. Building User Profiles from Topic Models for Personalised Search. Cikm, pages 2309--2314, 2013.
    [12]
    T. Heath and C. Bizer. Linked data: Evolving the web into a global data space. Synthesis lectures on the semantic web: theory and technology, 1(1):1--136, 2011.
    [13]
    P. Jain, P. Kumaraguru, and A. Joshi. @i seek 'fb.me': identifying users across multiple online social networks. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web companion, pages 1259--1268. ACM, 2013.
    [14]
    P. Kapanipathi, P. Jain, C. Venkataramani, and A. Sheth. User Interests Identification on Twitter Using a Hierarchical Knowledge Base. In The Semantic Web: Trends and Challenges, pages 99--113. Springer, 2014.
    [15]
    S. Kinsella, M. Wang, J. G. Breslin, and C. Hayes. Improving categorisation in social media using hyperlinks to structured data sources. In The Semanic Web: Research and Applications, pages 390--404. Springer, 2011.
    [16]
    J. Lehmann, R. Isele, M. Jakob, A. Jentzsch, D. Kontokostas, P. N. Mendes, S. Hellmann, M. Morsey, P. van Kleef, and S. Auer. Dbpedia-a large-scale, multilingual knowledge base extracted from wikipedia. Semantic Web Journal, 2013.
    [17]
    C. Lu, W. Lam, and Y. Zhang. Twitter user modeling and tweets recommendation based on wikipedia concept graph. In Workshops at the Twenty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2012.
    [18]
    M. Michelson and S. A. Macskassy. Discovering users' topics of interest on twitter: a first look. In Proceedings of the fourth workshop on Analytics for noisy unstructured text data, pages 73--80. ACM, 2010.
    [19]
    A. Mislove, B. Viswanath, K. P. Gummadi, and P. Druschel. You are who you know: inferring user profiles in online social networks. In Proceedings of the third ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, pages 251--260. ACM, 2010.
    [20]
    F. Orlandi, J. Breslin, and A. Passant. Aggregated, interoperable and multi-domain user profiles for the social web. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Semantic Systems, pages 41--48. ACM, 2012.
    [21]
    G. Piao. Towards Comprehensive User Modeling on the Social Web for Personalized Recommendations. In User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization. ACM, 2016.
    [22]
    G. Piao and J. G. Breslin. Analyzing Aggregated Semantics-enabled User Modeling on Google+ and Twitter for Personalized Link Recommendations. In User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization. ACM, 2016.
    [23]
    G. Piao and J. G. Breslin. Measuring Semantic Distance for Linked Open Data-enabled Recommender Systems. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pages 315--320. ACM, 2016.
    [24]
    K. Ramanathan and K. Kapoor. Creating User Profiles Using Wikipedia. In Conceptual Modeling - ER 2009, volume 5829, chapter 31, pages 415--427. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009.
    [25]
    B. Sriram, D. Fuhry, E. Demir, H. Ferhatosmanoglu, and M. Demirbas. Short text classification in twitter to improve information filtering. In Proceedings of the 33rd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 841--842. ACM, 2010.
    [26]
    F. M. Suchanek, G. Kasneci, and G. Weikum. Yago: a core of semantic knowledge. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 697--706. ACM, 2007.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Artificial Intelligence Alone Will Not Democratise Education: On Educational Inequality, Techno-Solutionism and Inclusive ToolsSustainability10.3390/su1602078116:2(781)Online publication date: 16-Jan-2024
    • (2024)Predicting users’ future interests on social networks: A reference frameworkInformation Processing & Management10.1016/j.ipm.2024.10376561:5(103765)Online publication date: Sep-2024
    • (2023)Semantic Interest Modeling and Content-Based Scientific Publication Recommendation Using Word Embeddings and Sentence EncodersMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti70900917:9(91)Online publication date: 15-Sep-2023
    • Show More Cited By
    1. Exploring Dynamics and Semantics of User Interests for User Modeling on Twitter for Link Recommendations

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      SEMANTiCS 2016: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Semantic Systems
      September 2016
      207 pages
      ISBN:9781450347525
      DOI:10.1145/2993318
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      In-Cooperation

      • Ghent University: Ghent University
      • AIT: Austrian Institute of Technology
      • Stanford University: Stanford University
      • Wolters Kluwer: Wolters Kluwer, Germany
      • Semantic Web Company: Semantic Web Company

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 12 September 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Funding Sources

      Conference

      SEMANTiCS 2016

      Acceptance Rates

      SEMANTiCS 2016 Paper Acceptance Rate 18 of 85 submissions, 21%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 40 of 182 submissions, 22%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Artificial Intelligence Alone Will Not Democratise Education: On Educational Inequality, Techno-Solutionism and Inclusive ToolsSustainability10.3390/su1602078116:2(781)Online publication date: 16-Jan-2024
      • (2024)Predicting users’ future interests on social networks: A reference frameworkInformation Processing & Management10.1016/j.ipm.2024.10376561:5(103765)Online publication date: Sep-2024
      • (2023)Semantic Interest Modeling and Content-Based Scientific Publication Recommendation Using Word Embeddings and Sentence EncodersMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti70900917:9(91)Online publication date: 15-Sep-2023
      • (2023)Personalized Recommendation after Classification of Tweets to Predict Depression using Sentiment Analysis2023 International Conference on Advances in Computation, Communication and Information Technology (ICAICCIT)10.1109/ICAICCIT60255.2023.10465832(827-832)Online publication date: 23-Nov-2023
      • (2023)Semantics aware intelligent framework for content-based e-learning recommendationNatural Language Processing Journal10.1016/j.nlp.2023.1000083(100008)Online publication date: Jun-2023
      • (2022)The marketing strategy of online video based on danmaku-video: A bimodal analysisAdvances in Psychological Science10.3724/SP.J.1042.2021.0156129:9(1561-1575)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2022
      • (2022)CD-SemMF: Cross-Domain Semantic Relatedness Based Matrix Factorization Model Enabled With Linked Open Data for User Cold Start IssueIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2022.317556610(52955-52970)Online publication date: 2022
      • (2021)Augmented Context-Based Conceptual User Modeling for Personalized Recommendation System in Online Social NetworksResearch Anthology on Strategies for Using Social Media as a Service and Tool in Business10.4018/978-1-7998-9020-1.ch027(521-540)Online publication date: 2021
      • (2021)Analyzing Features of Passive Twitter’s Users to Estimate Passive Twitter-User’s InterestsIEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology10.1145/3486622.3493979(476-481)Online publication date: 14-Dec-2021
      • (2021)Topic-model based Estimation of Passive Twitter-User's Interests from Followed Users' Tweets2021 10th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI)10.1109/IIAI-AAI53430.2021.00057(319-324)Online publication date: Jul-2021
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media