Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2998181.2998282acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Socially Embedded Work: A Study of Wheelchair Users Performing Online Crowd Work in China

Published: 25 February 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Information and Communications Technology (ICT) affords new opportunities for people with disabilities to participate in the workforce. However, little research has investigated how people with disabilities access and perform work through ICT. This paper presents a study of how people with disabilities, particularly those who are wheelchair users, perform online crowd work in China. We highlight an online crowd work practice that is highly embedded in social relationships that are developed through ICT over time. We call this socially embedded work to distinguish it from previous studies describing online crowd work as being devoid of social relationships. Our study uncovers the unique developmental dynamics of the online crowd work community self-organized by wheelchair users in China. Findings suggest that an ecosystem that focuses on fostering social relationships among the stakeholders can potentially address the wide range of issues of online crowd work reported in current crowd work literature.

References

[1]
US National Council. 2011. The Power of Digital Inclusion-Technology's Impact on Employment and Opportunities for People with Disabilities. Retrieved May 26, 2016 from http://www.ncd.gov/publications/2011/Oct042011.
[2]
Paul S Adler and Charles C Heckscher. 2006. The firm as a collaborative community: Reconstructing trust in the knowledge economy. Oxford University Press Oxford, UK.
[3]
Benjamin B Bederson and Alexander J Quinn. 2011. Web Workers Unite! Addressing Challenges of Online Laborers. CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 97--106.
[4]
Victoria Bellotti, Alexander Ambard, Daniel Turner, Christina Gossmann, Kamila Demkova, and John M Carroll. 2015. A muddle of models of motivation for using peer-to-peer economy systems. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1085--1094.
[5]
Yochai Benkler. 2006. The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale University Press.
[6]
Yochai Benkler. 2016. Peer production and cooperation. Handbook on the Economics of the Internet: 91.
[7]
Stacy M Branham and Shaun K Kane. 2015. Collaborative Accessibility: How Blind and Sighted Companions Co-Create Accessible Home Spaces BT Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2373-- 2382.
[8]
Dana Chandler and Adam Kapelner. 2013. Breaking monotony with meaning: Motivation in crowdsourcing markets. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 90: 123--133.
[9]
Tawanna R Dillahunt. 2014. Fostering Social Capital in Economically Distressed Communities. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 531--540.
[10]
Mark S Granovetter. 1973. The Strength of Weak Ties. The American Journal of Sociology 78, 6: 1360--1380.
[11]
Mark S Granovetter. 1985. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology: 481--510.
[12]
Mary L Gray, Siddharth Suri, Syed S Ali, and Deepti Kulkarni. 2016. The Crowd is a Collaborative Network. Proceedings of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work.
[13]
Caroline Haythornthwaite. 2009. Crowds and communities: Light and heavyweight models of peer production. System Sciences, 2009. HICSS'09. 42nd Hawaii International Conference on, 1--10.
[14]
Jeff Howe. 2006. The Rise of Crowdsourcing. Wired Magazine 14, 6.
[15]
Lilly C Irani and M Six Silberman. 2013. Turkopticon: Interrupting Worker Invisibility in Amazon Mechanical Turk. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 611-- 620.
[16]
Lilly Irani. 2015. The cultural work of microwork. New Media & Society 17, 5: 720--739.
[17]
Benjamin Jen, Jashanjit Kaur, Jonathan De Heus, and Tawanna R Dillahunt. 2014. Analyzing employment technologies for economically distressed individuals. CHI'14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1945--1950.
[18]
Matson L. Johnny and Rusch R. Frank. 1986. Quality of Life: Does Competitive Employment Make a Difference? In Competitive Employment Issues and Strategies., Frank R. Rusch (ed.). Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore.
[19]
Aniket Kittur, Ed H Chi, and Bongwon Suh. 2008. Crowdsourcing user studies with Mechanical Turk. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 453--456.
[20]
Aniket Kittur, Jeffrey V Nickerson, Michael Bernstein, et al. 2013. The Future of Crowd Work. Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM, 1301--1318.
[21]
Aniket Kittur, Bongwon Suh, Bryan A Pendleton, and Ed H Chi. 2007. He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 453--462.
[22]
Robert Kraut, Carmen Egido, and Jolene Galegher. 1988. Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaboration. Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, 1--12.
[23]
Anand Kulkarni, Matthew Can, and Björn Hartmann. 2012. Collaboratively Crowdsourcing Workflows with Turkomatic. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM, 1003--1012.
[24]
Anand Kulkarni, Philipp Gutheim, Prayag Narula, David Rolnitzky, Tapan Parikh, and Björn Hartmann. 2012. MobileWorks: Designing for Quality in a Managed Crowdsourcing Architecture. IEEE Internet Computing 16, 5: 28--35.
[25]
Greg Little, Lydia B Chilton, Max Goldman, and Robert C Miller. 2010. TurKit: Human Computation Algorithms on Mechanical Turk. Proceedings of the 23Nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, ACM, 57--66.
[26]
Peng Liu, Xianghua Ding, and Ning Gu. 2016. "Helping Others Makes Me Happy": Social Interaction and Integration of People with Disabilities. Proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work.
[27]
David Martin, Benjamin V Hanrahan, Jacki O'Neill, and Neha Gupta. 2014. Being a Turker. Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, ACM, 224-- 235.
[28]
Reid Priedhorsky, Jilin Chen, Shyong Tony K Lam, Katherine Panciera, Loren Terveen, and John Riedl. 2007. Creating, destroying, and restoring value in Wikipedia. Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM conference on Supporting group work, 259--268.
[29]
Robert D Putnam. 2001. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster.
[30]
Paul Resnick. 2001. Beyond bowling together: Sociotechnical capital. HCI in the New Millennium, 77: 247--272.
[31]
Joel Ross, Lilly Irani, M Silberman, Andrew Zaldivar, and Bill Tomlinson. 2010. Who are the crowdworkers?: shifting demographics in mechanical turk. CHI'10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2863--2872.
[32]
M Six Silberman, Lilly Irani, and Joel Ross. 2010. Ethics and Tactics of Professional Crowdwork. XRDS 17, 2: 39--43.
[33]
Anselm Strauss and Juliet M Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications.
[34]
Ronayne Tom and Tyrrell Tony T. 2005. " Motive, Means and Opportunity: An Argument for Changed Policy and Practice in Relation to the Employment of People with Disabilities." Disability and Employment: What the Research Tells Us. NDA 4th Annual Disability Research Conference Proceedings., 67--87.
[35]
Yutaka Yamauchi, Makoto Yokozawa, Takeshi Shinohara, and Toru Ishida. 2000. Collaboration with Lean Media: how open-source software succeeds. Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, 329--338.
[36]
Lixiu Yu, Paul André, Aniket Kittur, and Robert Kraut. 2014. A Comparison of Social, Learning, and Financial Strategies on Crowd Engagement and Output Quality. Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, ACM, 967--978.
[37]
Kathryn Zyskowski, Meredith Ringel Morris, Jeffrey P Bigham, Mary L Gray, and Shaun K Kane. 2015. Accessible Crowdwork?: Understanding the Value in and Challenge of Microtask Employment for People with Disabilities BT - Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, 1682--1693.
[38]
LeadGenius - The Most Efficient Way To Target And Connect With Your Ideal Customers. Retrieved May 26, 2016 from https://www.leadgenius.com/

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Towards Fair and Inclusive Speech Recognition for Stuttering: Community-led Chinese Stuttered Speech Dataset Creation and BenchmarkingExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650950(1-9)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)A silver lining for the excluded: Exploring experiences that micro‐task crowdsourcing affords workers with impaired work accessInformation Systems Journal10.1111/isj.1251134:6(1838-1870)Online publication date: 3-Mar-2024
  • (2023)Understanding the Role of Socio-Technical Infrastructures on the Organization of Access for the Mixed-Ability CollaboratorsACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing10.1145/3584732.3584739(1-1)Online publication date: 15-Feb-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Socially Embedded Work: A Study of Wheelchair Users Performing Online Crowd Work in China

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CSCW '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
    February 2017
    2556 pages
    ISBN:9781450343350
    DOI:10.1145/2998181
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 25 February 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. crowdsourcing
    2. embeddedness
    3. online crowd work
    4. people with disabilities
    5. socially embedded work
    6. wheelchair users

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    CSCW '17
    Sponsor:
    CSCW '17: Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
    February 25 - March 1, 2017
    Oregon, Portland, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    CSCW '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 183 of 530 submissions, 35%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

    Upcoming Conference

    CSCW '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)36
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
    Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Towards Fair and Inclusive Speech Recognition for Stuttering: Community-led Chinese Stuttered Speech Dataset Creation and BenchmarkingExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650950(1-9)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)A silver lining for the excluded: Exploring experiences that micro‐task crowdsourcing affords workers with impaired work accessInformation Systems Journal10.1111/isj.1251134:6(1838-1870)Online publication date: 3-Mar-2024
    • (2023)Understanding the Role of Socio-Technical Infrastructures on the Organization of Access for the Mixed-Ability CollaboratorsACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing10.1145/3584732.3584739(1-1)Online publication date: 15-Feb-2023
    • (2023)Building professional holding environments for crowd work job crafting through online communitiesInformation Systems Journal10.1111/isj.1245133:5(1239-1274)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2023
    • (2023)An Institutional Perspective: How Gatekeepers on a Higher Education Interact for the Organization of AccessComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)10.1007/s10606-023-09471-w32:3(713-744)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2023
    • (2022)Toward a More Inclusive Gig Economy: Risks and Opportunities for Workers with DisabilitiesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35557556:CSCW2(1-31)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
    • (2022)Understanding the Role of Socio-Technical Infrastructures on the Organization of Access for the Mixed-Ability CollaboratorsProceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3517428.3550410(1-6)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2022
    • (2022)Team Formation and Task Recommendation for Disabled People in Crowdsourcing Systems2022 IEEE 25th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD)10.1109/CSCWD54268.2022.9776093(1372-1377)Online publication date: 4-May-2022
    • (2022)A Labeling Task Design for Supporting Recent Algorithmic Needs2022 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data)10.1109/BigData55660.2022.10020415(2689-2698)Online publication date: 17-Dec-2022
    • (2021)Hugging with a Shower Curtain: Older Adults' Social Support Realities During the COVID-19 PandemicProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34796075:CSCW2(1-31)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2021
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media